Clinical and legal research on the meaning of mental illness and on definitions (and predictions) of dangerousness continue to offer the mental health law arena mostly disappointing results. In this article, the authors argue that much of this failure is linked to the prevailing Newtonian paradigm of cause-effect relationships, linear logic, and absolute order. In its place, the authors draw attention to the “new sciences”; that is, advances generated from quantum physics and chaos theory. To situate the analysis, the authors explore how psycholegal decision making unfolds. Specifically, the authors examine what contributions the new sciences offer society on the nature and meaning of psychiatric disorder and on the forecasting of violence. Along the way, the authors suggest how the new sciences advance the regard for citizen justice within the domain of mental health law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-Issa, I. (1982). Does culture make a difference in psychopathology? In I. Al-Issa (Ed.), Culture and psychopathology. Baltimore: University Park Press.
2.
American Psychological Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Arrigo, B. (1993). Madness, language, and law. New York: Harrow and Heston.
4.
Arrigo, B. (1994). Legal discourse and the disordered criminal defendant: Contributions for psychoanalytic semiotics and chaos theory. Legal Studies Forum, 18, 93-112.
5.
Arrigo, B. (1995). The peripheral core of law and criminology: On postmodern social theory and conceptual integration. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 447-472.
6.
Arrigo, B. (1996). The contours of psychiatric justice: A postmodern critique of mental illness, criminal insanity, and the law. New York: Garland.
7.
Arrigo, B. (1997). Transcarceration: Notes on a psychoanalytically-informed theory of social practice in the criminal justice and mental health systems. Crime, Law, and Social Change: An International Journal, 27(1), 31-48.
8.
Arrigo, B. (2000). Introduction to forensic psychology: Issues and controversies in crime and justice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Arrigo, B. (2001a). Postmodern justice and critical criminology: Position, relational, and provisional science. In M. D. Schwartz & S. Hatty (Eds.), Critical criminology. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
10.
Arrigo, B. (2001b). The critical perspective in psychological jurisprudence: Theoretical advances and epistemological assumptions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25(1).
11.
Arrigo, B. (2001c). Transcarceration: A constitutive ethnography of mentally ill offenders. The Prison Journal, 81(2), 162-186.
12.
Arrigo, B. (2001d). The inside out of the dangerous mentally ill: Topological applications to law and social justice. In E. Sullivan & D. Milovanovic (Eds.), Topologically speaking. New York: Other Press.
13.
Arrigo, B. (in press). Punishing the mentally ill: A critical analysis of law and psychiatry. New York: State University of New York Press.
14.
Arrigo, B., & Tasca, J. (1999). Right to refuse treatment, competency to be executed, and therapeutic jurisprudence: Toward a systematic analysis. Law and Psychology Review, 23, 1-47.
15.
Arrigo, B., & Williams, C. (1999a). Chaos theory and the social control thesis: A post-Foucauldian analysis of involuntary civil confinement. Social Justice, 26(1), 177-207.
16.
Arrigo, B., & Williams, C. (1999b). Law, ideology, and critical inquiry: The case of treatment refusal for incompetent prisoners awaiting execution. New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 25(2), 367-412.
17.
Barton, S. (1994). Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. American Psychologist, 49(1), 5-14.
18.
Becker, T. (1991). Quantum politics: Theory and applications in American politics and political science. In T. Becker (Ed.), Quantum politics. New York: Praeger.
19.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
20.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1997). The postmodern turn. New York: Guilford.
21.
Bohm, D. (1981). Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
22.
Briggs, J., & Peat, F. D. (1989). Turbulent mirror. New York: Harper & Row.
23.
Butz, M. (1997). Chaos and complexity: Implications for psychological theory and practice. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
24.
Capra, F. (1975). The tao of physics. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
25.
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Anchor.
26.
Clark, M. (1990). Nietzsche on truth and philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Cocozza, J., & Steadman, H. (1976). The failure of psychiatric predictions of dangerousness: Clear and convincing evidence. Rutgers Law Review, 29, 1084-1101.
28.
Cocozza, J., & Steadman, H. (1978). Prediction in psychiatry: An example of misplaced confidence in experts. Social Problems, 25, 265-276.
29.
Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. New York: Penguin.
30.
Dews, P. (1987). Logics of disintegration: Post-structuralist thought and the claims of critical theory. New York: Verso.
31.
diZerga, G. (1991). Integrating quantum theory with post-modern political thought and action: The priority of relationships over objects. In T. Becker (Ed.), Quantum politics. New York: Praeger.
32.
Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations in the disunity of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33.
Einstein, A. (1956). The meaning of relativity (5th ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
Einstein, A. (1961). Relativity: The special and general theory (R. Lawson, trans.). New York: Crown.
35.
Ennis, B. (1972). Prisoners of psychiatry: Mental patients, psychiatrists, and the law. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
36.
Fox, D. (1999). Psycholegal scholarship’s contribution to false consciousness about injustice. Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 9-30.
37.
Fox, D., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
38.
Gadamer, H. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.
39.
Gaw, A. (Ed.). (1993). Culture, ethnicity, and mental illness. Washington, DC: APA Press.
40.
Gergen, K. (1999). An introduction to social construction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
42.
Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach.New York: Harper & Row.
43.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
44.
Goerner, S. (1994). Chaos and the evolving ecological universe. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach Science.
45.
Grob, G. (1991). From asylum to community: Mental health policy in modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Grob, G. (1994). The mad among us: A history of the care of America’s mentally ill. New York: Free Press.
47.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Hunt, A. (1993). Exploration in law and society: A constitutive theory. New York: Routledge.
50.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe. New York: Pergamon.
51.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Leiter, B. (1994). Perspectivism in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of morals. In R. Schacht (Ed.), Nietzsche, genealogy, and morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
Levy, R., & Rubenstein, L. (1996). The rights of people with mental disabilities. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
54.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
55.
Milovanovic, D. (1994). A primer in the sociology of law (2nd ed.). New York: Harrow and Heston.
56.
Milovanovic, D. (1997). Chaos, criminology, and social justice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
57.
Monahan, J. (1997). Clinical and actuarial predictions of violence. In D. Faigman et al. (Eds.), Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony. St. Paul, MN: West.
58.
Monahan, J., & Arnold, J. (1996). Violence by people with mental illness: A consensus statement by advocates and researchers. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 19, 67-67.
59.
Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 783-783.
60.
Nietzsche, F. (1967). The genealogy of morals and ecce homo (W. Kaufmann, trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published 1887)
61.
Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published 1882)
62.
Overman, E. S. (1991). Policy physics. In T. Becker (Ed.), Quantum politics. New York: Praeger.
63.
Pepinsky, H. (1991). The geometry of violence. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Porter, E., & Gleick, J. (1990). Nature’s chaos. New York: Penguin.
66.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam.
67.
Reisner, R., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Law and mental health: Civil and criminal aspects (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
68.
Rosenau, P. (1992). Postmodernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
Ruhl, J., & Ruhl, H. (1997). The arrow of law in modern administrative states: Using complexity theory to reveal the diminishing returns and increasing risks the burgeoning law poses to society. University of California–Davis Law Review, 30, 405-482.
70.
Sarbin, T., & Juhasz, J. (1982). The concept of mental illness: A historical perspective. In I. Al-Issa (Ed.), Culture and psychopathology. Baltimore: University Park Press.
71.
Sarup, M. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
72.
Scheff, T. (2000). Being mentally ill (3rd ed.). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
73.
Shah, S. (1974). Some interactions of law and mental health in the handling of social deviance. Catholic University Law Review, 23(4), 674-719.
74.
Shah, S. (1977). Dangerousness: Some definitional, conceptual, and public policy issues. In B. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
75.
Slaton, C. (1991). Quantum theory and political theory. In T. Becker (Ed.), Quantum politics.New York: Praeger.
76.
Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. (1987). Constructing social problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
77.
Stewart, I. (1989). Does God play dice? The mathematics of chaos. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
78.
Szasz, T. (1974). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Harper & Row.
79.
Williams, C. R. (1999). Inside the outside and outside the inside: Negative fusion from the margins of humanity. Humanity and Society, 23(1), 49-67.
80.
Williams, C. R., & Arrigo, B. A. (2001). Law, psychology, and justice: Chaos theory and the new (Dis)order. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
81.
Wolf, F. (1989). Taking the quantum leap: The new physics for non-scientists. New York: Harper & Row.
82.
Wolinsky, S. H. (1993). Quantum consciousness: The guide to experiencing quantum psychology. Norwalk, CT: Bramble.
83.
Young, T. (1991). Chaos and social change: Metaphysics of the postmodern. Social Science Journal, 28(3), 289-305.
84.
Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (1994). The quantum society: Mind, physics, and a new social vision. New York: William Morrow.
