Outpatient Civil Commitment in Texas for Management and Treatment of Sexually Violent Predators: A Preliminary Report

Abstract

Texas established in 1999 outpatient civil commitment for sexually violent predators discharged from prison with or without parole. These individuals suffer from a behavioral abnormality, have been convicted of two or more sexually violent crimes and are deemed likely to reoffend. Civilly committed individuals are managed by a team composed of case manager (supervision), treatment provider, public safety officer (global positioning satellite monitoring), and other professionals. Treatment consists of individual and group therapy using a standard workbook. Out of 21 committed individuals, 7 are in the treatment, 1 died, 10 are in custody after breaking conditions of commitment that constitute a felony, and 3 await release from prison. Cost of outpatient civil commitment is less than $20,000/person/year compared with more than $100,000 for inpatient commitment in other states. Texas has found outpatient civil commitment to be an effective and relatively low-cost way to protect the public and treat the offender.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander, R. (2002). Civil commitment of sex offenders to mental institutions: Should the standard be based on serious mental illness or mental disorder? Journal of Health and Social Policy, 11, 67-78 .

Association of Treatment of Sexual Abusers Public Policy.(2001). Civil commitment of sexuality violent offenders . The Forum, 13, 4-5 .

Connor, J.M.(2002). Seling v. Young: Constitutionally protected but unjust civil commitment for sexually violent predators . Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 18, 511-541 .

Doren, D. M. (2000). Evidentiary issues, actuarial scales, and sex offender civil commitments . Sex Offender Law Report, 1, 65-79 .

Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., Huot, S. J.Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R.(1999).Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, performance and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved from http://psych-server.iastate.edu/faculty/Epperson/MnSOST-R.htm

Erickson, P. E. (2002). The legal standard of volitional impairment: An analysis of substantive due process and the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kansas v. Hendricks . Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 1-10 .

Ferrara, M. L. (2000a). The civilly committed sex offender in Texas . Texas Resource, 7, 1-4 .

Ferrara, M. L. (2000b). Lifestyle enhancement and development. Correctional Rehabilitation Services (Version 2.01). Austin, Texas: Correctional Rehabilitation Services .

Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D.(2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison or three actuarial scales . Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136 .

10.

Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems .

11.

Holmgren, B.(2002).A comparative analysis of state statutes providing for the involuntary commitment of sexually violent predators. In B. K. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender: Current treatment modalities and systems issues (Vol. 4, pp. 1-30). New Jersey: Civic Research Institute .

12.

Janus, E. S. (2000). Part I: The future of sex offender commitment laws: Treatment as a factor in offender commitment laws . Sex Offender Law Report, 1, 67-80 .

13.

LaFond, J. Q. (2000). The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks . Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 153-167 .

14.

Lund, C.A.(2000) Predictor of sexual recidivism: Did meta analysis clarify the role and relevance of denial . Sex Abuse, 12, 275-287 .

15.

Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources .

16.

Mumley, D.(2002). Sex offender laws: Separate finding of volitional impairment not required for civil commitment of sexually violent persons . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 313-314 .

17.

Myers, R.(2000). State civil commitment law withstands constitutional challenges . Sex Offender Law Report, 1, 71-77 .

18.

Noffsinger, S.G., & Resnick, P.J.(2000). Sexual predator laws and offenders with addictions . Psychiatric Annual, 30, 602-608 .

19.

Parsons, C. (2000). Sex offender program criticized . Dallas Morning News, 28, 4 .

20.

Sreenivasan, S., Kirkish, P., Garrick, T., Weinberger, L. E., & Phenix, A. (2000). Actuarial risk assessment models: A review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 438-448 .

21.

Stirpe, T.S., Wilson, R.J., & Long, C.(2001). Goal attainment scaling with sexual offenders: A measure of clinical impact at post treatment and at community follow-up . Sex Abuse, 13, 65-77 .

22.

Wollert, R. (2001). ADVERSARIAL FORUM: An analysis of the argument that clinicians under-predict sexual violence in civil commitment cases . Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 171-184 .