Several states have enacted public policies that prohibit sex offenders who have abused children from living within close proximity to a school, park, day care center, or school bus stop. The purpose of this exploratory study was to describe the impact of residence restrictions on sex offender reintegration and to better understand sex offenders' perceptions of these laws. A survey of 135 sex offenders in Florida was conducted. Most of the molesters who responded to the survey indicated that housing restrictions increased isolation, created financial and emotional stress, and led to decreased stability. Respondents also indicated that they did not perceive residence restrictions as helpful in risk management and, in fact, reported that such restrictions may inadvertently increase triggers for reoffense. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittleman, M. S., Murphy, M. S.,& Rouleou, J. L. (1987). Self-reported crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of InterpersonalViolence, 2, 3-25.
2.
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittleman, M. S.,& Rouleou, J. L. (1988). Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16(2), 153-168.
3.
Ahlmeyer, S., Heil, P., McKee, B., & English, K. (2000). The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research& Treatment, 12(2), 123-138.
4.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Center for SexOffender Management. (2002). Managing sex offenders in the community: A handbook to guide policymakers and practitioners through a planning and implementation process. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Colorado Department of Public Safety. (2004). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: SexOffender Management Board.
Doe v. Miller & White, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Iowa (2004).
9.
Edwards, W.,& Hensley, C. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(1), 83-101.
10.
Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S. J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W.,& Goldman, R. (1999). Minnesota sex offender screening tool—revised (MnSost-R): Development performance, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from%20www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/%20epperson
11.
Freeman-Longo, R. E. (1996). Prevention or problem?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 8(2), 91-100.
12.
Furby, L., Weinrott, M., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3-30.
13.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
14.
Hanson, R. K.,& Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: Ameta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
15.
Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 14(2), 169-194.
16.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism. Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
17.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 13(2), 105-122.
18.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated metaanalysis. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works & Government Services.
19.
Hanson, R. K.,& Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders(No. User Report 1999-02). Ottawa, Canada: Department of the SolicitorGeneral of Canada.
20.
Heil, P., Ahlmeyer, S., & Simons, D. (2003). Crossover sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 15(4), 221-236.
21.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2003). Level three sex offenders residential placement issues. St. Paul, MN: Author.
22.
Special Conditions of Sex Offender Probation, Florida Statute 948.03 (1997).
23.
Walker, J. T., Golden, J. W., & VanHouten, A. C. (2001). The geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims: A routine activities approach. Justice Research and Policy, 3(2), 15-33.
