Effect of Test Administration Set on the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS)

Abstract

The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) was administered to 160 male prisoners on admission to a medium-security federal correctional facility. A total of 106 of these inmates completed the PICTS a second time 6 months later in a routine follow-up of the intake PICTS; the other 54 inmates completed the PICTS a second time approximately 6 months later during the initial session of a psychological group. Results showed that inmates participating in the psychological group were less defensive and endorsed more criminal thinking items on the second administration of the PICTS, whereas inmates participating in the routine follow-up were more defensive and less likely to endorse criminal thinking items on the second PICTS. Despite a general increase in the magnitude of PICTS scores for program participants, the overall pattern of scale elevations (correlations between scales and high-point pairs) was comparable across the two groups.

Keywords

psychological set test administration PICTS inmates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barends, A. , Westen, D. , Leigh, J. , Silbert, D. , & Byers, S. (1990). Assessing affect-tone of relationship paradigms from TAT and interview data. Psychological Assessment, 2, 329-332.

Caldwell-Andrews, A. , Baer, R. A. , & Berry, D. T. R. (2000). Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 472-488.

Forbey, J. D. , & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2002). Use of the MMPI-2 in the treatment of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 308-318.

Lundy, A. (1988). Instructional set and Thematic Apperception Test validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 309-320.

Masling, J. M. (1992). The influence of situational and interpersonal variables in projective testing. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 59, 616-640.

McGovern, F. J. , & Nevid, J. S. (1986). Evaluation apprehension on psychological inventories in a prison-based setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 576-578.

Morey, L. C. , & Quigley, B. D. (2002). The use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in assessing offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 333-349.

Nichols, D. S. , & Greene, R. L. (1997). Dimensions of deception in personality assessment: The example of the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 251-266.

Prochaska, J. O. , & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Addictive behaviors: Processes of change (pp. 3-27). New York: Plenum.

10.

Rogers, R. , Sewell, K. W. , Martin, M. A. , & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10, 160-177.

11.

Walters, G. D. (1990). The criminal lifestyle: Patterns of serious criminal conduct. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Walters, G. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307-325.

13.

Walters, G. D. (1999). Short-term outcome of inmate participation in the Lifestyle Change Program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 322-337.

14.

Walters, G. D. (2001). Revised validity scales for the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 32, 1-13.

15.

Walters, G. D. (2002). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS): A review and meta-analysis. Assessment, 9, 278-291.

16.

Walters, G. D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced inmates: Prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 399-421.