Previous hypothetical scenario tests of rational choice theory have presented all participants with the same set of consequences, implicitly assuming that these consequences would be relevant for each individual. Recent research demonstrates that those researcher-presented consequences do not accurately reflect those considered by study participants and that there is individual variation in the relevance of various consequences. Despite this and some theoretical propositions that such differences should exist, little empirical research has explored the possibility of predicting such variation. This study allows participants to develop their own set of relevant consequences for three hypothetical offenses and examines how several demographic and theoretical variables impact those consequences' relevance. Exploratory results suggest individual factors impact the perceived relevance of several cost and benefit types, even among a relatively homogenous sample of college students. Implications for future tests of rational choice theory, as well as policy implications are discussed.
Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/ rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law and Society Review, 26, 343-372.
2.
Bouffard, J.A. (2002a). The influence of emotion on rational decision making in sexual aggression. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 121-134.
3.
Bouffard, J.A. (2002b). Methodological and theoretical implications of using subject generated consequences in tests of rational choice theory. Justice Quarterly, 19, 747-771.
4.
Brezina, T., & Piquero, A. (2003). Exploring the relationship between social and non-social reinforcement. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory, social learning theory and the explanation of crime (pp. 265-288). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
5.
Clarke, R.V., & Felson, M. (1993). Introduction: Criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 1-13). London: Transaction Publishers.
6.
Clarke, R.V., & Homel, R. (1997). A revised classification of situational crime prevention techniques. In S. P. Lab (Ed.), Crime prevention at a crossroads (pp. 17-27). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7.
Cornish, D.B., & Clarke, R.V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933-947.
8.
Decker, S., Wright, R., & Logie, R. (1993). Perceptual deterrence among active residential burglars: A research note. Criminology, 31(1), 135-147.
9.
Exum, M.L. (2002). The application and robustness of the rational choice perspective in the study of intoxicated and angry intentions to aggress . Criminology, 40, 933-967.
10.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Grasmick, H.G., & Bursik, R.J. (1990). Conscience, significant others and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24, 837-861.
12.
Grasmick, H.G., & Green, D.E. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, 71, 325-335.
13.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J., & Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
14.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley : University of California Press.
15.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books .
16.
Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The deterrent effects of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27, 721-746.
17.
Nagin, D.S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review , 27, 467-496.
18.
Nagin, D.S., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32, 581-606.
19.
Nagin, D.S., & Pogarsky, G. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extra legal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39, 865-891.
20.
Nagin, D.S., & Pogarsky, G. (2003). Experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology, 41, 167-194.
21.
Paternoster, R., Saltzman, L.E., Waldo, G.P., & Chiricos, T.G. (1983). Perceived risk and social control. Law and Society Review, 17, 457-479.
22.
Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review, 30, 548-583.
23.
Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C., & Matsueda, R.L. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51, 101-119.
24.
Piquero, A.R., & Tibbetts, S.G. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self control and situational factors in offenders' decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
25.
Pogarsky, G. (2002). Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly , 19, 431-452.
26.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Sherman, L.W., & Smith, D.A. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680-690.
28.
Tibbetts, S.G., & Herz, D.C. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice. Deviant Behavior, 17, 183-208.
29.
Wilson, J.Q., & Herrnstein, R.J. (1985). Crime and human nature: The definitive study of the causes of crime. New York: Simon and Schuster.
30.
Wood, P.B., Gove, W.R., Wilson, J.A., & Cochran, J.K. (1997). Non-social reinforcement and habitual criminal conduct: An extension of learning theory. Criminology, 35, 355-366.
31.
Wright, R.T., & Decker, S.H. (1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
