Issues Regarding the Clinical Use of the Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) Assessment Instrument

Abstract

The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence produced an instrument for classifying hospitalized psychiatric patients according to their risk of behaving violently following discharge. The instrument, Classification of Violence Risk (COVR) has been computerized and is now commercially available to clinicians. A validation study performed by the original researchers showed that when the instrument was applied to a new sample of patients, it demonstrated a considerable reduction in positive predictive power. Potential factors affecting the instrument's accuracy in applied settings are reviewed. It is concluded that, until additional research clarifies uncertainty about the instrument, clinicians would do well to be very cautious in utilizing COVR results to make judgments as to violence risk, particularly when the test results suggest a high risk of future violence.

Keywords

COVR violence risk assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dwyer, C. (1996). Cut scores and testing: Statistics, judgment, truth, and error. Psychological Assessment, 8, 360—362.

Ellwood, R. (1993). Psychological tests and clinical discriminations . Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 409—419.

Epperson, D. , Kaul, J. , Huot, S. , Goldman, R. , & Alexander, W. (2003). Minnesota Sex O fender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) technical paper: Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved October 24, 2006, from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~dle/mnsost_download.htm.

Haimowitz, S. (2004). Slowing the revolving door: Community reentry of offenders with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 55, 373—375.

Hare, R. (1991). Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-HealthSystems.

Heilbrun, K. (2003). Violence risk: From prediction to management. In D. Carson & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 127—142). New York: Wiley .

Meehl, P. , & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194—216.

Miller, H. (2006). Inventory of o fender risk, needs, and strengths. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Monahan, J. , Steadman, H. , Appelbaum, P. , Grisso, T. , Mulvey, E. , Roth, L. , et al. (2005). COVR Classification of Violence Risk. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

10.

Monahan, J. , Steadman, H. , Appelbaum, P. , Robbins, P. , Mulvey, E. , Silver, E. , et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry , 176, 312—319.

11.

Monahan, J. , Steadman, H. , & Robbins, P. (2006). Use of the COVR in violence risk assessment. Psychiatric Services, 57, 143.

12.

Monahan, J. , Steadman, H. , Robbins, P. , Appelbaum, P. , Banks, S. , Grisso, T. , et al. (2005). An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56, 810—815.

13.

Monahan, J. , Steadman, H. , Silver, E. , Appelbaum, P. , Robbins, P. , Mulvey, E. , et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: the MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.

14.

Nunnally, J. , & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

15.

Ortega, R. (2006). The triumph of the actuaries: Science in violence risk assessment. Retrieved May 19, 2006, from http://www.psychinfo.com/psyccritiques/display/?artid=2006259711.

16.

Quinsey, V. , Harris, G. , Rice, M. , & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent o fenders: Appraising and managing risk . Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

17.

Reid, W. (2003). Risk assessment, prediction, and foreseeability . Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 9, 82—86.

18.

Skeem, J. , & Louden, J. (2006). Toward evidence-based practice for probationers and parolees mandated to mental health treatment. Psychiatric Services, 57, 333—342.

19.

Steadman, H.J. , Silver, E. , Monahan, J. , Appelbaum, P.S. , Robbins, P.C. , Mulvey, E.P. , et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83—100.

20.

Stone, A. , Turkkan, J. , Bachrach, C. , Jobe, J. , Kurtzman, H. , & Cain, V. (Eds.). (2000). The science of self-report. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Swets, J. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240(4587), 1285—1293.