This study provides a preliminary descriptive profile of individuals having been issued an 810 recognizance order (i.e., peace bond). This preventive order is issued to individuals in the community considered by the court to be high-risk sex offenders. In total, 88 offenders were issued an 810.1 (at risk of sexual offence against a child) or an 810.2 (at risk of a personal injury offence) recognizance order between April 2006 and February 2008, among whom 59 sex offenders were included. The sociodemographics, risk profiles, and recidivism of offenders under the orders were analyzed. Two risk assessment tools, the Static-99 and the Stable, were used to describe this population. Comparisons were made between sex offenders under 810.1 and 810.2 orders. Preliminary analyses suggest that these men are heterogeneous in terms of their level of risk of reoffending. Only one offender sexually reoffended while under the order. On the other hand, the general recidivism rate was about 30%, with many breaching the conditions of their order. The findings are discussed in light of the community risk management of high-risk sex offenders.
Alexander, M.A. ( 1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101-116.
2.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., & Blanchard, R. ( 2007). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the VRAG and SORAG: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6, 29-46.
3.
Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. ( 2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
4.
Bonta, J., Wallace-Cappretta, S., & Rooney, J. ( 2000). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive supervision program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 312-329.
5.
Doren, D.M. ( 2004). Toward a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 835-856.
6.
Gottfredson, S.D., & Moriarty, L.J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime & Delinquency , 52, 178-200.
7.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 646-652.
8.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122.
9.
Hanson, R.K., Morton, K.E., & Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 154-166.
10.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
11.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
12.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. ( 2007). Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging or the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 34, 297-313.
13.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumiere, M.L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. ( 2003). A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
14.
Janus, E. ( 2003). Legislative responses to sexual violence: An overview . Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 247-264.
15.
Lafond, J.Q. ( 2005). Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Langan, P.A., Schmitt, E.L., & Durose, M.R. ( 2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
17.
Langstrom, N. ( 2004). Accuracy of actuarial procedures for assessment of sexual offender recidivism risk may vary across ethnicity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 107-120.
18.
Levenson, J.S., & Morin, J.W. ( 2006). Risk assessment in child sexual abuse cases. Child Welfare, 85, 59-82.
19.
Lieb, R., Quinsey, V.L., & Berliner, L. ( 1998). Sexual predators and social policy. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23, 43-111.
20.
Looman, J. ( 2006). Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 18, 193-206.
21.
Lussier, P. ( 2005). The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: Revisiting the specialization debate. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 269-292.
22.
Lussier, P., Dahabieh, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2008). Challenges faced by criminal justice practitioners involved in the community risk management of high-risk sex offenders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Lussier, P., & Healey, J. ( 2008). Rediscovering Quetelet, again: The "aging" offender and the prediction of reoffending in a sample of adult sex offenders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
Lussier, P., LeBlanc, M., & Proulx, J. ( 2005). The generality of criminal behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sex offenders in adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 177-189.
25.
Lussier, P., Leclerc, B., Cale, J., & Proulx, J. ( 2007). Developmental pathways of deviance in sexual aggressors . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1441-1462.
26.
Motiuk, L.L., & Vuong, B. ( 2005). Homicide, sex, robbery and drug offenders in federal corrections: An end of 2004 review. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Research Branch Correctional Service of Canada.
27.
Nunes, K.L., Firestone, P., Bradford, J.M., Greenberg, D.M., & Broom, I. ( 2002). A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 249-265.
28.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. ( 1990). Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: Early results from an experiment in California. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 87-111.
29.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. ( 1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281-335.
30.
Petrunik, M. ( 2003). The hare and the tortoise: Dangerousness and sex offender policy in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45, 43-72.
31.
Proulx, J., Tardif, M., Lamoureux, B., & Lussier, P. ( 2000). How does recidivism risk predict survival? In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 466-483). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Quinsey, V.L., Lalumiere, M.L., Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. ( 1995). Predicting sexual offenses. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 114-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Sample, L.L., & Bray, T.M. ( 2003). Are sex offenders dangerous?Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 59-82.
34.
Simon, L.M.J. ( 2000). An examination of the assumptions of specialization, mental disorder, and dangerousness in sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 275-308.
35.
Sjöstedt, G., & Grann, M. ( 2002). Risk assessment: What is being predicted by actuarial prediction instruments? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 179-183.
Wollert, R. ( 2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes’s theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56-85.
