Like adult drug courts, juvenile drug courts have proliferated at a rapid rate during the past 15 years, but comparatively little research has been conducted on them. Although a few studies indicate that these programs appear to show promise as an intervention, almost nothing has been published using systematic and empirical methods to provide a description and specific examples of how these programs are structured and implemented. The purpose of the current study, therefore, is to summarize and integrate findings from systematic process evaluations of three juvenile drug courts. Similarities and differences in the structure and design of the programs are noted and findings regarding the program model for each juvenile drug court, including target population, therapeutic activities, and initial and long-term goals are presented. During-program outcome data also are presented, and findings are reported as a “snapshot” of what happened during one calendar year in the operation of each program.
American University. (2001). Drug court activity update: Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Court Clearinghouse .
2.
Andrews, D.A. ( 1986). The risk principle of case classification: An outcome evaluation with young adult probationers. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 28, 377-384.
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Dowden, C. ( 2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 88-100.
4.
Applegate, B.K., & Santana, S. ( 2000). Intervening with youthful substance abusers: A preliminary analysis of a juvenile drug court. The Justice System Journal , 21, 281-300.
5.
Belenko, S., & Dembo, R. ( 2003). Treating adolescent substance abuse problems in the juvenile drug court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 87-110.
6.
Belenko, S., & Logan, T.K. ( 2003). Delivering more effective treatment to adolescents: Improving the juvenile drug court model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 189-211.
7.
Bouffard, J.A., & Taxman, F.S. ( 2004). Looking inside the "black box" of drug court treatment services using direct observations. Journal of Drug Issues , 34, 195-218.
8.
Bryan, V., Hiller, M.L., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2006). Qualitative examination of the juvenile drug court treatment process. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 6, 91-114.
9.
Butts, J. A., & Roman, J. (Eds.). (2004). Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
10.
Cooper, C. ( 2001). Juvenile drug court programs. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
11.
Cooper, C. ( 2002). Juvenile drug treatment courts in the United States: Initial lessons learned and issues being addressed. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 1689-1722.
12.
Galloway, A.L., & Drapela, L.A. ( 2006). Are effective drug courts an urban phenomenon? Considering their impact on recidivism among a nonmetropolitan adult sample in Washington State. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 280-293.
13.
Garrity, T.F., Prewitt, S.H., Joosen, M., Staton Tindall, J., Webster, J.M., Hiller, M.L., et al. (2006). Correlates of subjective stress among drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(3), 269-279.
14.
Garrity, T.F., Prewitt, S.H., Joosen, M., Staton Tindall, J., Webster, J.M., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2008). Baseline subjective stress predicts 1-year outcomes among drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 346-357.
15.
Gilmore, A.S., Rodriguez, N., & Webb, V.J. ( 2005). Substance abuse and drug courts: The role of social bonds in juvenile drug courts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice , 3, 287-315.
16.
Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 27-72.
17.
Gray, A.R., & Saum, C.A. ( 2005). Mental health, gender, and drug court completion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 55-69.
18.
Hannah-Moffat, K. ( 2005). Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject: Hybridizations of risk/need in penality. Punishment & Society, 7, 29-51.
19.
Harrell, A. ( 1996). Evaluation strategies for human services programs. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
20.
Henggeler, S.W. ( 2007). Juvenile drug court: Emerging outcomes and key research issues. Opinions in Psychiatry, 20, 242-246.
21.
Henggeler, S.W., Halliday-Boykins, C.A., Cunningham, P.B., Randall, J., & Shapiro, S.B. ( 2006). Juvenile drug court: Enhancing outcomes by integrating evidence-based treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 42-54.
22.
Hiller, M.L., Logan, T.K., Malluche, D., Patterson, B., Abensur, R.L., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2003). An implementation evaluation of the Fayette County Juvenile Drug Court. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
23.
Hiller, M.L., Narevic, E., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2001). An evaluation of the Campbell County Juvenile Drug Court. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
24.
Hiller, M.L., Narevic, E., Logan, T.K., & Leukefeld, C.G. (2002). Jefferson County juvenile drug court evaluation: Preliminary findings. Lexington : University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
25.
Hiller, M.L., Narevic, E., Logan, T.K., Leukefeld, C.G., & Minton, L. ( 2002). An evaluation of the Campbell County juvenile drug court . Offender Substance Abuse Report, 2(1), 1-9.
26.
Huddleston, C.W., Freeman-Wilson, K., Marlowe, D.B., & Roussell, J.A. (2005). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving court programs in the United States. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
27.
Kaminer, Y., Bukstein, O., & Tarter, R. ( 1991). The Teen-Addiction Severity Index (T-ASI): Rationale and reliability. International Journal of Addictions, 26, 219-226.
28.
Logan, T.K., Leukefeld, C.G., & Williams, K. ( 1999). Fayette drug court program process evaluation. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
29.
Logan, T.K., Messer, J., & Minton, L. ( 2001). Adolescent intake assessment. Lexington : University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
30.
Logan, T.K., Williams, K., & Leukefeld, C.G. (1999). Warren drug court program process evaluation. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
31.
Logan, T.K., Williams, K., Leukefeld, C.G., & Minton, L. ( 2000). A drug court process evaluation: Methodology and findings . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44(3), 369-394.
32.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., et al. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 7-26.
33.
Marlowe, D.B. ( 2004). Drug court efficacy versus effectiveness. Retrieved September 29, 2004, from http://www.jointogether.org/news/yourturn/commentary/2004/drug-court-efficacy-vs.html
34.
Marlowe, D.B., Festinger, D.S., & Lee, P.A. ( 2006). Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 52-76.
35.
Miller, M.L., Scocas, E.A., & O’Connell, J.P. (1998). Evaluation of the Juvenile Drug Court Diversion Program. Dover, DE: Statistical Analysis Center.
36.
O’Connell, J.P., Nestlerode, E., & Miller, M.L. ( 1999). Evaluation of the Delaware Juvenile Drug Court Diversion Program. Dover, DE: Statistical Analysis Center.
37.
Office of Applied Studies. (2003). National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 2000 and 2001. Retrieved May 29, 2003, from http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/nhsda.htm#NHSHA.info
38.
Randall, J., Halliday-Boykins, C.A., Cunningham, P.B., & Henggeler, S.W. (2001). Integrating evidence-based substance abuse treatments into juvenile drug courts: Implications for outcomes . National Drug Court Institute Review, 3, 89-116.
39.
Rodriguez, N., & Webb, V.J. ( 2004). Multiple measures of juvenile drug court effectiveness: Results of a quasi-experimental design. Crime and Delinquency , 50, 292-314.
Rossman, S.B., Butts, J.A., Roman, J., DeStefano, C., & White, R. ( 2004). What juvenile drug courts do and how they do it. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 55-106). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
42.
Royse, D., Thyer, B.A., Padgett, D.K., & Logan, T.K. ( 2001). Program evaluation: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43.
Sanford, J.S., & Arrigo, B.A. ( 2005). Lifting the cover on drug courts: Evaluation findings and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 239-259.
44.
Saum, C.A., Scarpitti, F.R., & Robbins, C. ( 2001). Violent offenders in drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 107-128.
45.
Shaw, M., & Robinson, K. ( 1998). Summary and analysis of the first juvenile drug court evaluation: The Santa Clara County drug treatment court and the Delaware juvenile drug court diversion program. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1, 73-85.
46.
Sloan, J.J., & Smykla, J.O. ( 2003). Juvenile drug courts: Understanding the importance of dimensional variability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 339-360.
47.
Sloan, J.J., Smykla, J.O., & Rush, J.P. ( 2004). Do juvenile drug courts reduce recidivism? Outcomes of drug court and an adolescent substance abuse program. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 95-115.
48.
Stoops, W.W., Tindal, M.S., Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., & Leukefeld, C. ( 2005). Methamphetamine use in nonurban and urban drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 260-276.
49.
Taxman, F.S. ( 1999). Unraveling "what works" for offenders in substance abuse treatment services. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(2), 93-134.
50.
Taxman, F.S., & Bouffard, J.A. (2005). Treatment as a part of drug court: Impact on graduation rates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 23-50.
51.
Taxman, F., & Thanner, M. ( 2006). Risk, need, and responsivity (RNR): It all depends. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 28-51.
52.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). State and county quick facts: Kentucky. Retrieved May 28, 2003 , from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/
53.
United States Department of Justice. (1997 ). Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.
54.
Wiseman, C.M. ( 2005). Drug courts: Framing policy to ensure success. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 235-238.
