Existing research on date rape has identified important correlations between rape-supportive attitudes and sexual aggression. What remains unclear is the mechanism by which these attitudes are translated into sexually aggressive behavior. This study borrows from a rational choice framework to explore the relationship between attitudes, perceptions of the risks and rewards of engaging in date rape, and self-reported hypothetical aggression in a date rape scenario. Results suggest that rape-supportive attitudes are related to particular patterns of identified risks and rewards of date rape as well as to the self-reported likelihood of engaging in date rape behavior. This supports a perspective that certain attitude structures may alter the risks and rewards that potential offenders consider in deciding whether or not to engage in sexual aggression. Implications for future research and prevention programs are discussed.
Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., Clinton, A.M., & Buck, P.O. ( 2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 16, 784-807.
2.
Adams-Curtis, L.E., & Forbes, G.B. ( 2004). College women’s experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 91-122.
3.
Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1993). A contemporary look at the effects of rape law reform: How far have we really come? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, 554-574.
4.
Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. ( 1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review , 26, 343-372.
5.
Bartoli, A.M., & Clark, M.D. ( 2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality & Culture, 10, 54-80.
6.
Beauregard, E., Proulx, J., Rossmo, K., Leclerc, B., & Allaire, J. ( 2007). Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1069-1084.
7.
Beauregard, E., Rossmo, D.K., & Proulx, J. ( 2007). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: A rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 449-463.
8.
Becker, G.S. ( 1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
9.
Bouffard, J.A. ( 2002). The influence of emotion on rational decision making in sexual aggression. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 121-134.
10.
Burt, M.R. ( 1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
11.
The Clery Act.Student Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1092 (1990). Campus Sexual Assault Victims’ Bill of Rights Amendment ( 1992).
12.
Cornish, D.B., & Clarke, R.V. ( 1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25, 933-947.
13.
DeKeseredy, W.S., & Schwartz, M.D. (1993). Male peer support and woman abuse: An expansion of DeKeseredy’s model. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 393-413.
14.
DuMont, J., Miller, K., & Myhr, T.L. ( 2003). The role of "real rape" and "real victim" stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women, 9, 466-486.
15.
Estrich, S. ( 1987). Real rape: How the legal system victimizes women who say no. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Fisher, B.S., Cullen, F.T., & Turner, M.G. ( 2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megías, J.L. (2004). Social perceptions of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143-161.
19.
Gardner, W., Mulvey, E.P., & Shaw, E.C. ( 1995). Regression analysis of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin , 118, 392-404.
20.
Geiger, B., Fischer, M., & Eshet, Y. ( 2004). Date-rape-supporting and victim-blaming attitudes among high school students in a multiethnic society. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 406-426.
21.
Gidycz, C.A., Layman, M.J., Rich, C.L., Crothers, M., Gylys, J., Matorin, A., & Jacobs, C.D. ( 2001). An evaluation of an acquaintance rape prevention program: Impact on attitudes, sexual aggression, and sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1120-1138.
22.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. ( 1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J., & Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
24.
Green, D. ( 1989). Measures of illegal behavior in individual-level deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 253-275.
25.
Karjane, H.M., Fisher, B.S., & Cullen, F.T. ( 2002). Campus sexual assault: How America’s institutions of higher education respond (Final Report, NIJ Grant No. 1999-WA-VX-0008). Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
26.
Kim, M., & Hunter, J. ( 1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, Part 2. Communications Research, 20, 331-364.
27.
Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. ( 1989). The deterrent effects of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27, 721-746.
28.
Koralewski, M.A., & Conger, J.C. ( 1992). The assessment of social skills among sexually coercive college males. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 169-188.
29.
Krahé, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). The role of sexual scripts in sexual aggression and victimization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 687-701.
30.
Laner, M.R., & Ventrone, N.A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited . Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488-500.
31.
Littleton, H.L., & Axsom, D. ( 2003). Rape and seduction scripts of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape. Sex Roles, 49, 465-475.
32.
Littleton, H.L., Tabernik, H., Canales, E.J., & Backstrom, T. ( 2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793-804.
33.
Lloyd, S.A., & Emery, B.C. ( 2000). The dark side of courtship: Physical and sexual aggression . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
35.
Lowenstein, G., Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (1997). The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 443-473.
36.
Muehlenhard, C.L., & Rodgers, C.S. ( 1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443-463.
37.
Paternoster, R. ( 1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173-217.
38.
Pogarsky, G. ( 2004). Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42, 111-136.
39.
Polaschek, D.L.L., & Ward, T. ( 2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385-406.
40.
Ryan, K.M. ( 2004). Further evidence for a cognitive component of rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 579-604.
41.
Schwartz, M.D., DeKeseredy, W.S., Tait, D., & Alvi, S. ( 2001). Male peer support and a feminist routine activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18, 623-649.
42.
Shotland, R.L., & Goodstein, L. ( 1983). Just because she doesn’t want to doesn’t mean it’s rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly , 46, 220-232.
43.
Tittle, C.R., Ward, D.A., & Grasmick, H.G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333-366.
44.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. ( 2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
45.
Wright, B.R.E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 180-213.
