Abstract
The article presents the political, economic, and sociocultural factors that make Turkey an attractive destination for foreign sex workers, and reviews trends in official statistics of arrested traffickers, rescued victims, and deportation of migrant illegal sex workers. In-depth interviews of 20 law enforcement and nongovernmental organizations staff members, who in the course of their work come into close contact with foreign sex workers, shed light on the statistics. The interview data provide insights into the structure of the Turkish sex market, the factors that bring foreign women to work in this market, and the impact of legal reforms on the circumstances of foreign sex workers. The article concludes with the implications of the findings for public policy.
Keywords
Introduction
Globalization has transformed the economic organization and industries of countries around the world; notable among them is the sex industry (Erez, 2001; Gozdiak and Bump, 2008; Hearn, 2014; Rahman, 2011). The combined effects of enhanced communication technologies, accessibility of information, and easy cross-border transportation have substantially altered the global sex market (Aronowitz, 2009; Shelley, 2010). Globalization has also facilitated cooperation among geographically diverse criminal groups, establishing effective transnational networks to move and employ persons (trafficked victims or voluntary parties) in the sex market. The participation of foreign women in the sex industry is a worldwide social concern, as vulnerable women (and girls) form the pool of candidates for employment in the sex market (Bales, 2000, 2005; Kelly, 2005; Lehti & Aromaa, 2006).
Turkey represents one of the top 10 destination countries for foreign women in the sex industry (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [UNDOC], 2006). Turkey’s geographical proximity to Central and Eastern Europe—the source and transit countries for human trafficking—makes it an ideal destination (Bales, 2000; Hughes, 2001; UNDOC, 2006). With the increase in human trafficking over the past two decades, Turkey has amended its laws to criminalize these activities. Article 80 of the Turkish Penal Code (TPC) defines human trafficking, and imposes a penalty of 8 to 12 years imprisonment and a “day fine” corresponding to 10,000 workdays for such crimes. Turkey also provides shelters and offers medical testing and psychological and social services to victims. The services are funded by the government or by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs; Republic of Turkey, Turkish National Police, n.d-a; TPC, 2004; U.S. Department of State, 2014).
Despite being a major destination for sex trafficking, research on the sex industry in Turkey has been limited. Extant research has focused on sex workers’ characteristics, motivations, decision-making processes, and work and living conditions, as well as traffickers’ use of deceptive methods to recruit women and tactics to exploit victims (Demir, 2010; Demir & Finckenauer, 2010; Gülçür & İlkkaracan, 2002). Studies have also documented how responses to sex trafficking stigmatize and discriminate against victims (Atauz, Akbaş, & Atasü-Topçuoğlu, 2009) and the ways migration and prostitution regimes in Turkey increase sex workers’ vulnerability to gender violence (Coskun, 2015). Some have critiqued the literature’s focus on the economic causes of sex work while ignoring sociocultural factors such as patriarchy (Karakus & Basıbuyuk, 2010; Zhidkova, & Demir, 2016).
One of the notable findings in extant research is that some foreign women who engage in sex work in Turkey’s sex industry do so voluntarily, and that not all sex workers are trafficked victims. Irrespective of the debate in feminist literature about whether sex industry work can be considered voluntary (Hughes, 2004; Karakus & McGarrell, 2010; Landesman, 2004; Limoncelli, 2009), some scholars have attempted to draw a distinction between sex trafficking and sex work (Caouette & Saito, 1999; Doezema, 2002). Yet issues of agency, or coercion versus voluntariness in becoming a sex worker, continue to preoccupy scholars, activists, and practitioners (Doezema, 2002; Farley, 2016). The question of agency is particularly significant in the context of globalization and migration: Biographies of migrants reflect the difficulties of reaching precise demarcations of voluntary versus coerced sex work (Gülçür & İlkkaracan, 2002), suggesting that sex workers’ agency is not a binary phenomenon (Coontz & Griebel, 2004; Kelly, 2005). Recent research in Turkey indicates that the entry or reentry of many foreign women to the sex industry is not coerced—the product of traffickers’ deceptive, manipulative, or forcible recruitment methods (Dinler, 2010; Sever, Demir, & Kahya, 2012; Shelley, 2010)—but rather willful (Demir, 2008; Demir & Finckenauer, 2010).
This article aims to explore the circumstances and degrees of voluntariness in foreign women’s sex work in Turkey through the lens of practitioners who closely work with them. This case study contributes to the debate on the meaning of agency, highlighting its fluidity, the tension between voluntariness and coercion as foreign women survive in a global context, and the many variations of agency at different stages of foreign sex workers’ “careers.”
The article first presents the geopolitical, economic, and sociocultural context of Turkey’s sex industry and the trends in statistics about its composition and involved foreign parties (traffickers and sex workers). 1 This review is followed by a description of the research methodology and sample. Major findings about the reasons foreign women 2 migrate to Turkey, and the economic, cultural, and legal factors that influence their work circumstances and experience are then presented. The article concludes with the public policy implications of the findings in regard to foreign sex workers in Turkey and beyond.
Background and Context
Turkey has a strategic geographical location, situated between Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Balkans, the Black Sea, and Mediterranean Sea. Its close relations with neighboring and regional countries provide visitors with privileges and economic advantages. One of the reasons for Turkey’s substantial economic growth in recent decades has been its open foreign policy allowing people to move across its borders freely, and bilateral trade agreements facilitating easy movement of goods within this region, policies that have significantly increased imports and exports (Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, n.d.).
Turkey has also become an important energy corridor between the West and East because its neighboring and regional countries have three fourths of the world’s oil and natural gas. Consequently, Turkey has built pipelines to transport oil and natural gas, and maintains bilateral agreements with countries like Azerbaijan, Iraq, and Iran, and more recently has started new projects with the Russian Republic (Winrow, 2007). Turkey also provides convenient transportation options for visitors, such as airplanes, buses, ships, and trains.
Turkey’s geographical location, together with its lenient visa policy (citizens of neighboring countries do not need a visa to enter Turkey, and can stay there between 30 to 90 days), provides the country significant economic benefits. At the same time, geographical proximity to several potential source countries and ease of entry render Turkey vulnerable to migration abuse, making it an important destination point for sex workers, particularly from former Soviet Union (FSU) countries.
Without travel restrictions, women from neighboring countries travel to and enter Turkey as tourists, informal traders, and temporary workers (e.g., domestic help). The economic liberalization policy of the FSU countries has led to increased formal and informal trade (Yukseler, 2004; Zengin, 2015). The regional tradition of suitcase trade—an informal, cash-based, unrecorded, and untaxed sale and purchase of small commodities between Turkey and surrounding countries (Deniz, 2014; Ender & Kaska, 2003)—has contributed to large numbers of women traveling to Turkey. Tourists visiting Turkey often import goods such as textiles, cloth, leather garments, and other small goods to their countries. The estimated value of the suitcase trade between the Russian Federation and Turkey is more than US$6 billion (R. Bulut, 2015; Yukseler, 2004; Zengin, 2015).
The Turkish tourism industry, which is a significant contributor to the Turkish economy and employment, is another gate through which women enter the country (Deniz, 2014; Gökmen, 2011). Between 2001 and 2008, the World Tourism Organization ranked Turkey 10th as a destination country for international tourism, and in 2009 it was ranked seventh. In 2010, 28.6 million international tourists visited and spent more than US$20 billion in Turkey (Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, n.d.). Beginning in 2000, the number of tourists from the FSU countries increased nearly 10-fold (Ozgenc, 2011), and tourism from the Russian Federation to Turkey has doubled over the past decade (see Table 1).
Number of Tourists From Former Soviet Union Countries Visiting Turkey in Years 2004-2009.
Source. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK), Tourism Statistics 2009; data not available after 2009.
These political and economic changes in the region have affected migration trends and facilitated the growth of the sex industry in Turkey. Foreign women who enter Turkey as tourists, to trade, or seek work (whether in the sex market or other pursuits) sometimes end up in the sex industry (Sever et al., 2012; Ustubici, 2011). As the interview data suggest, these women can be placed on a continuum ranging from voluntary to forced participation in the sex industry, with many shades of agency in between.
The Turkish Sex Market
Prostitution is legal in Turkey, which has state-run brothels. Employment in state-licensed brothels is permitted only for those who have Turkish citizenship, and state registered prostitutes’ identification cards are marked with the label “sex worker.” Turkish prostitution law (Article 227of the TPC) prohibits prostitution and procurement of prostitutes outside the licensed brothels and registered sex workers, and the penalty increases if the activity is related to organized crime (TPC, 2004). It is illegal for foreigners and unregistered Turks to perform sex work at hotels, apartments, customer accommodations, bars, discos, and other public or private locations. Nonetheless, the number of illegal foreign sex workers in the Turkish sex market has continually increased in past decades. Many of these women work in unprotected environments controlled by criminal organizations; they are unaware of Turkey’s policies and vulnerable to violence and sexual abuse (Bozlar, 2005).
As of 2011 (the last year for which official statistics on sex workers are available), there were about 3,000 registered sex workers who worked in the 56 state-licensed brothels known as “genelevler.” At that time, more than 15,000 registered sex workers who could not find work in legal places were working illegally, outside the brothel industry, in uncontrolled locations. In addition, since the fall of the Soviet Union, many foreign sex workers have entered the Turkish sex industry (Cokar & Kuntay, 2007; Coontz & Griebel, 2004; Coskun, 2014; Demir, 2010; Dinler, 2010; Kelly, 2005). It is estimated that the sex market in Turkey includes around 100,000 legal or illegal Turkish-native sex workers (Ankara Ticaret Odasi Raporu, 2004) and another 30,000 to 50,000 illegal foreign sex workers (Tekerek, 2007).
Licensed (registered) sex workers are monitored by the police and routinely screened for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The increasing numbers of foreign sex workers and unregistered Turkish sex workers (who are not subject to regular medical checks) have led to higher rates of STD infection, as evidenced through the increased spread of HIV, Gonorrhea, Syphilis, and Chlamydia. Turkish government statistics indicate that of the approximately 400,000 deportations recorded between 1995 and 2002, most were foreign women trafficked from FSU countries, and over 90% were deported for illegal prostitution (234,420) and STDs (70,380; Ender & Kaska, 2003). In 2011, the government designed ways to combat prostitution, including restricting the number of licensed sex workers and reducing the number of brothels. These restrictions have led to an increase in the number of illegal sex workers (Kahvecioglu, 2016), most of whom were trafficked women from FSU countries, or foreign women who voluntarily engage in sex work (Milliyet, 2016).
Between 2004 and 2011, women from Moldova, the Russian Federation, and the Ukraine comprised the largest pool of trafficked persons rescued by the police, and more than 95% of those rescued were trafficked from FSU countries. The number of trafficked women has gradually decreased over the years (see Table 2).
The Nationality of Trafficked Sex Workers Rescued in Turkey From 2004 to 2011.
The arrest statistics of traffickers from various countries involved in the sex industry indicate that Turkish traffickers comprise the largest category, followed by traffickers from FSU countries and then the Turkic republics (see Table 3). These statistics suggest collaboration between Turkish criminal groups and their counterparts in source countries.
Number of Traffickers Arrested Between 2005 and 2010 by Country of Origin.
Data are available only for the first 5 months of 2010. See Note 2 for 2010 data.
Following arrest, the voluntary sex workers are sent to a venereal disease hospital for a medical examination. If they have any STDs, they are deported and their STD status is recorded. If they do not have an STD, they are deported and recorded as engaging in illegal prostitution. Although the statistics may not capture all women engaged in sex work, the reported numbers clearly indicate that voluntary female sex workers outnumber trafficked women rescued by the police (Table 4 presents deportation statistics of foreign women who engaged in sex work voluntarily and were not considered victims of trafficking).
Numbers of Foreign Sex Workers Deported for Engaging in Illegal Prostitution or Carrying STDs, 2001 to 2009.
Source. Turkey National Police.
Note. STD = sexually transmitted diseases; IPr = illegal prostitution.
Between 2001 and 2009, 24,570 sex workers, who are considered voluntarily involved in the sex market, were deported. Of these deportees, 22.7% (5,588) were diagnosed with STDs. The highest percentages of deported sex workers came from Moldova (18.5%), Georgia (16.5%), and Ukraine (16.3%). Between late 2004 and 2011, Turkish law enforcement officials identified 1,247 persons as victims of human trafficking. Until 2008, most came from Moldova, Ukraine, and the Russian Republic. After 2008, the majority of women were from Central Asian countries, especially the Turkic Republics (Sahin & Polat, 2014).
In the following sections, we analyze interview data of practitioners who, in the course of their daily work, handle and attend to foreign sex workers. The interviews provide textured descriptions of the economic, political, and sociocultural contexts of Turkey’s sex industry, illuminating the social processes and dynamics behind the statistics, including changes in foreign sex workers’ agency.
Method
In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted from 2010 to 2013 with 20 employees of either the Turkish government or NGOs who attend to sex workers. These practitioners, in the course of their daily work, frequently interact and communicate with sex workers, gaining information about the sex workers, and nuanced understanding of the sex industry. They are therefore a valuable data source about migration and sex work in Turkey, foreign sex workers women’s circumstances, and the impact of political, economic, and legal changes on the sex industry.
It is well known that gaining access to the secretive world of sex work is fraught with problems (Zhang, 2009). In Turkey, as elsewhere, identifying and locating foreign sex workers (whether trafficked or not) often depends on police investigative efforts and assistance provided by national and international NGOs. Women who work illegally in sex industry are typically located in closely guarded spaces and often are under organized crime control (Coontz & Griebel, 2004; Kelly, 2005). In many cases, they are intimidated by requests for interviews, and reluctant to reveal to “strangers” information about their circumstances. Turkish law enforcement personnel and various NGOs employees who work with these women can therefore provide insights about the sex industry and its workers, information that cannot be gained by interviewing the women.
The interviewees were recommended by their organizations’ leadership as having experience and knowledge about the topic, or were identified as key staff members on their relevant organizations’ official websites. Practitioners who had at least 5 years of experience were invited to participate in the study either via telephone or through an email message that included a recruitment flyer with an explanation of the research purpose. All those invited to participate agreed to be interviewed. The resultant sample includes 20 practitioners who worked between 5 and 15 years with foreign sex workers in some capacity related to sex work prevention, protection, prosecution, health services, and legal assistance. Government employees (all male) included 10 police officials of different ranks from the Department of Public Order (Sex Crime Unit) of the Turkey National Police (TNP) in Ankara, Antalya, and Istanbul, as well as the Department of Foreigners, Borders and Asylum of the Interior Ministry in Ankara and Istanbul; a prosecutor who investigated sex trafficking cases in Istanbul; a judge working in the Ministry of Justice in Ankara; a physician from the Ministry of Health who provides medical assistance to sex workers at a hospital for skin and venereal diseases in Istanbul; and an expert on sex trafficking law and practice affiliated with the International Center for Terrorism and Transnational Crime of the TNP. The six advocates (all female) worked for international and local NGOs that handle foreign sex workers in Ankara and Istanbul.
The practitioners signed an institutional review board (IRB)–approved consent form and were then interviewed individually in the cities in which they worked. The interviews were conducted in Turkish and lasted between 1½ and 2 hours. The protocol elicited the practitioners’ work experience and history, varying interactions and communications with sex workers in Turkey, and their experience-based views about voluntary and coerced sex work. Probing questions included explanations for their views, examples to substantiate them, and experiences that shed light on the meaning or degrees of voluntariness in sex work in Turkey. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using coding schemes that captured themes (Charmaz, 2006) until data saturation was reached.
Findings
The Geopolitical and Sociocultural Context of Turkey as a Destination Country
The interviews confirmed that foreign women who become sex workers find Turkey an attractive destination for several practical reasons. Turkey’s lenient visa policy is a key element in shaping the decision to migrate. An NGO staffer explained, Turkey’s lenient visa policy is one of the reasons migrant female populations of FSU countries prefer Turkey. For example, you cannot find voluntary or involuntary sex workers from Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania in the Turkish sex market because after the collapse of the Soviet Union, they entered the European Union and were able to move freely throughout Europe. The migrant sex workers from these countries [Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania] mostly prefer working in the sex markets of Baltic and other Western European countries. Visas are not required.
A police official who compared Turkey visa policy with other countries observed, The U.S. and the European Union countries have stringent visa policies targeting most of the FSU countries because they consider them risky. On the other hand, Turkey has visa-free mutual agreements with FSU countries or gives their citizens’ entry visa at the border gate. In my view, this is the main problem of sex trafficking in Turkey.
Another police official commented that the lenient visa policy, which was intended to facilitate tourism and economic relations between Turkey and the source countries, has indeed facilitated sex trafficking: After the agreement on visa-free travel was signed between Turkey and the Turkic Republics, there was a significant increase in the number of women entering Turkey from these countries. The number of these women in the sex industry also increased.
NGO staff confirmed that “the traffickers prefer easily entered destination countries like Turkey, and voluntary sex workers also prefer migrating to Turkey.”
Geographical proximity was another major factor that played a role in the growth of Turkey’s sex industry. As a transit and destination country, Turkey bridges the route between the continents of Asia, Africa, and Europe, as well as shares a border with the European Union. Consequently, as one police official noted, its geographical location between the poorer East and the richer West affects its role in trafficking, providing traffickers from various countries the opportunity to bring, harbor, and transport “prey” of all types: Turkey is suffering not only from sex trafficking, but also human smuggling. For example, in 2007 and 2008, more than 60,000 people were smuggled into Turkey from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, Iraq, Burma, and Somali.
The academic expert commented on the travel options that Turkey’s geographical proximity to source countries offers: “Turkey’s geographical location provides various and inexpensive travel options. Women from FSU come to Turkey via sea, air, and land.” A police official explained, “Women from Azerbaijan, Georgia, Romania, and Bulgaria prefer traveling by bus because it is inexpensive and available for travel every day.” An NGO staffer noted the importance of travel cost for both the trafficked and voluntary sex workers: “Most of the women say that in comparison to other European countries, it is very inexpensive to travel to Turkey. For example, the boat fare from Odessa to Istanbul is only US$50.” A police official added, “Some women start making money while travelling to Turkey . . . There is a disco on the boat, so the women can begin working and networking before reaching Turkey.”
The combination of lenient visa policy and low travel costs makes Turkey an attractive destination for voluntary sex workers who can easily and inexpensively receive visas or renew them. As one police official observed, “Some of these women use the bus to go renew their visa. They leave the country and then return to Turkey after changing the date.”
The decision to migrate to a country also depends on the destination’s economic conditions and sex market regulations. An International Organization for Migration (IOM) representative compared Turkey with European countries, such as Germany and the Netherlands, which allow foreign women to work in their legal sex markets: The number of the sex workers who come from Bulgaria and Romania has decreased remarkably since their countries became members of the EU. They prefer the EU instead of Turkey because travel is borderless and economic conditions there are good and sex work is legal.
Turkey’s elaborate urban entertainment sector is another factor making the country an attractive sex work destination. The prosecutor observed, “In addition to Turkey’s visa policy, the voluntary sex workers and organized crime members prefer Turkey due to its night life.”
An important reason for Turkey being a preferred destination for many foreign sex workers is its language and culture. Women from the Turkic republics favor Turkey because its language, religion, and culture are similar to their own. Language skills allow easy communication with customers and other relevant parties, and better adaptation to the sex market. An NGO staffer noted, The languages of Azerbaijan, Gagavuz Turks in Moldova, some people in the Abkhazia region of Georgia, in Dagestan, some parts of the Russian Federation, and Turks in Bulgaria are very similar. Also women from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kirgizstan, Kazakhstan, andTajikistan, can easily learn Turkish due to the similarity of their languages.
Many migrant sex workers who worked in other countries and could compare Turkey with other destinations preferred working with Turkish clients. A police official elaborated, . . . One of the Romanian women had worked in Turkey before Romania entered the European Union. Later, she went to Spain to work in its sex industry, but a short time afterward, she returned to Turkey. When I asked her why she returned, she explained “when Spanish customers pay, they just want to be serviced. On the other hand, when Turkish customers pay, they are kinder, sometimes buying gifts, flowers, or taking us out for dinner.”
In some cases, Turkish clients have proactively attempted to help the foreign women or improve their welfare. An NGO staff from the IOM explained, Turkish men are more sensitive to the migrant sex worker. For example, unlike European countries, there are 157 helplines in Turkey. Customers usually call these helplines to inform the police of the women so that they can be rescued in Turkey.
The Demand Factor and Foreign Sex Workers
The practitioners observed that the demand for sex services affects the number of and types of foreign sex workers in the market. Interviewees noted that men of all social strata turn to the sex industry, and they do so according to their means. A police official explained, A construction worker makes money from hard work, but easily, in one night, spends his money at the bar and hotel with migrant prostitutes. On the other hand, some of the upper-class males have bachelor’s flats and keep a woman there, for several months, just for them. They pay a monthly wage to these women, such as US$3,000 or US$4,000 for each month.
Foreign sex workers, unlike their Turkish counterparts, are subject to penalties and deportation if they are caught doing sex work; however, there are no penalties for the customers of foreign workers. Furthermore, because the legal sex market is not sufficiently large to meet the demand, the illegal sex industry has continuously expanded. One NGO staff member explained, “There are less than 150 registered sex workers among 14 million people in Istanbul. In the state brothels, there are not enough registered sex workers to satisfy the demand.” Another NGO staff member noted, One of the biggest problems in this sector is that the number of current licensed sex workers is very small and not sufficient to fill the demand of the sex market. Therefore, new women are brought in continually, and this practice goes on endlessly.
The complex registration restrictions and limits on numbers of legal prostitutes affect the illegal sex market, as one NGO staff member explained: Currently it is difficult for Turkish women to register to work in the legal state brothels. Those who have registered in the past are getting older, but the clientele prefers young women. As the number of legal registered sex workers decreases, the number of illegal migrant sex workers increases.
Interviewees reported that the demand for foreign women, particularly from the FSU countries, increased following the political and economic changes in the region. With the fall of the Iron Curtain, sex workers from FSU countries have become very popular in Turkey. An NGO staff member noted, “Turkish men prefer the ‘Natasha’—women who are Russian, Ukrainian, Moldavian and Belarusian.” A police officer elaborated, When the traffickers bring a group of involuntary sex workers, the panderers [local traffickers who employ the sex workers] within the network of the traffickers select the women. The women’s price depends on their age and beauty, which are associated with the demand. Therefore, new faces will continue to be part of the entertainment industry.
Traffickers, however, target women from other source countries as well. These women are unaware of the destination country to which they are trafficked or the risks involved in being a sex worker. An NGO staff member noted, The women from the Turkic Republics have not been told that they are going to Turkey. They tell their families they are going to Moscow to work because, in these countries, if a woman goes to Turkey, people know what kind of work they will be doing there.
In Turkey, like the rest of the international labor market, the demand for inexpensive, flexible, and low skill-level service jobs makes migrant women the preferred employees, as they often accept lower wages and agree to less desirable working conditions. But when these women arrive in Turkey, they often seek better paying jobs. An NGO member from the Women Solidarity Organization explained, In Turkey, there is a demand for nannies and nurses because it is difficult to find Turkish women who are willing to work nights or 24/7. Foreign women are recruited due to their low wages and higher education. They are paid US$400 or US$500 for a month for this work. But some of them decide to engage in sex work because they can make at least five times more working in the sex industry.
The Turkish sex industry, particularly the illegal sex market, caters mostly to a domestic clientele. A police official explained, “During police operations, officers find that nearly all of the customers in hotels, night clubs, and private venues were persons of Turkish origin. Few tourists are involved. Turkey is not a sex tourism country.” This market attracts customers from different parts of the country who know the entertainment sector and find their way to the red-light districts. A police official observed, Turkish customers from small cities go to the bigger cities for the sex market. For example, the people from different parts of Turkey come to Istanbul, especially to the Aksaray, Silivri, and Kumburgaz districts, for entertainment. Another example can be seen in Antalya. In front of the hotels in the Manavgat district, you can find the cars that are registered in Konya, a city that is regarded as being conservative [without an extensive sex market].
The demand supports a network of roles and businesses in the entertainment sector, as one police officer explained: Some hotel owners are part of organized groups. Most hotels include a disco. When a migrant sex worker finds the customer in a disco, she uses a room of the hotel. After intercourse, she returns to the disco for a second customer. Some of the hotel owners resell the same room more than one time, deletes the register, and do not pay tax. Everybody receives mutual benefits.
The Socioeconomic Context of Foreign Sex Workers in Turkey
The practitioners agreed that most foreign women who come to work in the Turkish sex industry do it for economic reasons. Lack of employment opportunities for women in FSU countries, including the substantial gap between men’s and women’s wages, compel women from these countries to migrate and seek work opportunities elsewhere. An international NGO staffer explained, It is clear that economic difficulties of FSU countries are the main factor influencing women to migrate. For example, you cannot find women from prosperous countries such as Germany, France or England in the Turkish sex market.
A local NGO staff member added, “Females have higher rates of poverty and unemployment than males [in FSU countries].” Another NGO staffer elaborated, In the source countries, the potential jobs and opportunities are limited. It is often necessary to pay a bribe to get a job, and even when they do get a job, the salary is not enough to sustain their lives. Therefore, women are willing to work anywhere.
One police official described the lure of high incomes in the Turkish sex marker as follows: Sex workers see Turkey as a potential lucrative marketplace, since they want to earn a lot of money. In 2010, sex workers could earn between US$2,000 and US$4,000 a month, which would provide an entire year’s income, or more, in their home country.
An NGO staff member who worked with trafficked women explained, Most of the victims state that their main reason for coming to Turkey is to escape the poverty and high unemployment rates in their countries. The monthly income in most of the FSU countries is between US$30.00 and US$100.00. Working in the Turkish sex market yields an average of US$100.00 per customer. This money would go a long way to support their families.
Stories about the high earning potential in Turkey’s sex industry travel fast in source countries. These “success stories” are contagious, as one NGO staff member, who interviewed numerous victims in a shelter, commented: It is like a Cinderella story. Women who succeed in making money in the Turkish illegal sex market bring their profits and stories home with them. This news spreads in the community and encourages other women to follow their example.
The disparate earning potential is also an incentive for sex workers in FSU countries to migrate. A researcher described the earning calculations of the “Natashas”—“the way Turks refer to migrant Slavic sex workers with blond hair and blue eyes from FSU countries”—as follows: Thirty percent of the victims in Turkey had been sex workers in their home countries. They want to make more money in a short time. In fact, both types of workers would like to come to Turkey for money-oriented purposes.
The opportunity for “easy money” often motivated women to ignore the many risks that such work entails. This is particularly the case with those who have not had prior experience in the sex industry, making them likely to become trafficking victims. An NGO staff commented, “During interviews with the trafficked women, most of them say that everybody goes to Turkey and makes easy money there. Nobody is concerned about how they earn it.” Compared with voluntary workers, a senior police official explained, women who are trafficked are not aware of the work that awaits them in Turkey and are easily deceived about its nature. The trafficked victims have no means to travel except through traffickers, and no way to validate the nature of the employment offers they receive. This police official continued, “As a matter of fact, most of the trafficked women had been misled about the work situations, and were pushed into sex work instead of the originally promised legitimate jobs, such as nannies, waitresses, or nurses.”
Organized criminal groups aware of the demand gap bring foreign women to work in the entertainment sector. An NGO staff member explained, “The low risks and huge monetary benefits associated with trafficking make it much more attractive than other crimes. And the increasing demand for young and beautiful women increases the numbers of victims of sex trafficking.” The lucrative sex work also lures those working in services that cater to the sex industry to enter this market. A senior police official from an antiprostitution unit observed, Besides the increasing demand for young women, some of the taxi drivers or waitresses in the entertainment sector decide to change jobs and become panderers in order to make more money, because they see some people in the sex market making a huge amount of money. This also leads to an increase in the size of the sex market.
The financial benefits that cause the sex market to expand were summarized by an NGO staff member as follows: The marketing of sex is an illicit nonregistered trade, conducted on a cash-only basis, that does not pay any taxes to the Turkish government, and the revenues that it generates are huge.
Working Arrangements in the Sex Market and Related Hardships
The practitioners reported that trafficked and voluntary sex workers differ in their expectations regarding work conditions. The voluntary sex workers often work with an intermediary who finds them work through his or her customers or network. An NGO staff member noted, “Some of the voluntary workers have a mutual agreement concerning their working conditions with middlemen; their panderers recruit and provide them with customers in hotels or private apartments.”
Women who have language skills and experience in the local sex market can choose their customers and work settings. An NGO member explained, Many of voluntary workers work individually at discos, bars, or taverns. Those who have a sufficient customer network in the sex market arrange their meetings via telephone. Furthermore, some use their network connections to refer customers to each other.
Technology provides important advantages to voluntary workers who can use cell phones instead of finding potential customers on the street or in public places. Cell phones provide them with independence, privacy, and anonymity. Furthermore, they decrease the potential for deportation. A police official noted, Most of the voluntary workers obtain work via telephones and do not accept customers without references; if they do not know the customer or the person who referred him, they do not respond to the call. This tactic reduces the risk of being arrested by the police.
In contrast, trafficked workers are forced into performing sex work and are subject to threats and violence. They also differ in their work venues, and most importantly, the amount of control they have over their schedules, money, and movement. A police official explained, Trafficked women are likely to be confined in closed quarters and their passports taken away when rescued by the police. Also, there is usually a bodyguard at their place of work. They have limited space and are mostly forced to work in private settings.
Another police official added, “Women who work in hotels, bars, or discos work voluntarily,but trafficked workers are forced to sex work in private places.” The two groups also differ in the amount of freedom they have to attend to their everyday needs. A senior police official, who participated in most of the sex trafficking operations in Istanbul, explained, Trafficked women do not have the opportunity to go to a hairdresser because the panderers do not allow them to go out. In contrast, voluntary workers pay a lot of attention to their appearance before going to a customer because they have to charm the customers.
Traffickers use various threats to gain their victims’ compliance. One NGO staff member relayed, “Traffickers threatened to tell the families of women from the Turkic Republics exactly the type of work they were doing. Many of them have strong patriarchal family structures, keen moral sensibility, and a strong sense of family honor.” This is an effective control measure because work in the sex market is shameful, not only for the involved women but also for their kin.
The traffickers also create obstacles that hinder victims’ ability to escape. A police official observed, “The women were forced to overstay their legal time limits in Turkey because the traffickers and panderers did not allow them to renew their visas. In addition, the traffickers and panderers make them frightened of the police and deportation.”
Some traffickers use drugs to overcome women’s reluctance to engage in sex work or comply with the customers’ demands. An NGO staff member explained, “The women were forced to use drugs without their consent . . . Drug addiction makes them dependent and more willing to cooperate with the traffickers and panderers.”
Trafficked sex workers also suffer from various health-related problems more often than voluntary sex workers. They are less able to practice safe sex, making them vulnerable to STDs. In contrast, voluntary workers use condoms. The physician elaborated on the health implications of voluntary compared with coerced sex work: Trafficked women carry at least 5 times higher sexually transmitted diseases risk than voluntary ones. Also, the unexpected pregnancy rate is high among trafficked women, who have no choice for protection. Indeed, one of the slogans for public awareness campaigns is really meaningful: “You pay for a night. She pays with her life” as I remember.
The health-related implications of coerced sex work were described by a police officer: The trafficked women are forced to have sex twenty five days a month, even thirty days including during menstruation period. They are forced to serve four to thirteen customers a day. They have no time even to take a shower. Also, they do not have suitable health care opportunities, and are forced to have unsafe sex. They are therefore at high risk for being infected with sexually transmitted diseases.
In addition, trafficked women also experience mental health problems. An NGO staff member, who has dealt with trafficked women at shelters, commented on the deep mental imprint of being coerced to work in the sex industry: After rescue or escape, these women have both physical and psychological symptoms. They recover from the physical effects in time but the psychological effects take much longer time.
Trafficked women also have problems adapting to “normal” daily life once they have been rescued. The long-term implications of forced sex work were described by the physician as follows: “Psychological and emotional health problems of trafficked sex workers can result in guilt feelings, depression, substance use, and eating disorders . . .”
The Changing Profiles of Foreign Sex Workers in Turkey
Interviewees agreed that foreign women coming to work in Turkey typically exhibit certain characteristics. Police officials observed that the trafficked women are young (between 18 and 25 years), from rural areas, have a low educational level (less than high school), and little life and work experience. These attributes, combined with poverty and willingness to migrate to find work, increase their risk of victimization. An NGO staff member noted, “Most of the trafficked women from Moldova do not come from the capital city or other large cities; they come from rural areas . . . and this is true of trafficked women from other FSU countries.” NGO staff members of different organizations agreed on these commonalities among trafficked women: “Most of them have low work qualifications or are semi-skilled laborers who are looking for legitimate unskilled jobs, such as babysitters, cooks, sales personnel, and waitresses.” They leave their countries in search of employment, being unaware of the risks involved. In the words of the interviewed researcher, “These women would seriously consider or accept any basic job that is offered to them. They do not check the credibility of these offers. Therefore, they become a suitable target for traffickers.” One police official explained, . . . The traffickers are looking for women who have fewer life experiences, and need a job or money. The victims have no idea about the world and have not been in Turkey before. They can be easily misled.
According to the interviewees, in the post-Soviet period, many women in FSU countries became the breadwinners and were expected to support their families: “One-third of the trafficked women in Turkey have a child. Many of them were married at an early age and got divorced. They bear the full responsibility of supporting and caring for the children.” Victims from other countries shared the same predicament, as one NGO staff member noted: “The victims from Turkic Republics are mostly married or divorced, have children, and are older than women from Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia.” Yet it was life experience, including in the sex market, more than age per se, that differentiated the trafficked women and those who work voluntarily in the market.
The practitioners observed that in contrast to most trafficked women, voluntary sex workers are typically older, have attained higher education levels, have more life experience, and are more likely to recognize the possible risks of sex trafficking. Some have gained experience by first being trafficked, and their familiarity with the market helps them to better navigate it. These women have therefore more control over their work situation and income. Even when they continue to work with traffickers, they are able to negotiate their work conditions. As one police officer explained, Most of the voluntary workers were successful in earning money in the sex market. . . . Some of them work with traffickers and panderers by mutual agreement, and when they face unexpected working conditions or fail to meet an agreement, they may become victims of sex trafficking.
Although the practitioners did not find differences between trafficked and voluntary workers in terms of the countries from which they originated, the numbers of women arriving from each country have fluctuated over the years. In the 2000s, trafficked women arrived mostly from Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia. However, beginning in 2007, their numbers have continually decreased, while the number of women arriving from Turkic republics (as Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan are referred to in Turkey) has increased. Many women from the Turkic republics obtain a tourist visa with the specific intention of working in the sex industry.
The easy access to communication and information technologies in the age of globalization and the digital sexual commoditization of women have likewise contributed the expansion of the market. An NGO staff member explained: The sex market is expanding to the internet in Turkey. The Turkish community is globalized and has adopted the technology. Nearly half of 75 million people are internet users. Also, Turkey is the 4th largest country on Facebook with more than 22.5 million people. I can say [with confidence] that some of Turkish males find partners out of the country by using the internet.
At the same time, the increased awareness of the nature and risks of sex trafficking for women in source countries has led to the decrease of trafficked women. One of the experts from the IOM noted, In Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia, there are more than 150 nongovernmental organizations which have campaigns where they provide activities and training to increase public awareness about women who are being trafficked for sexual exploitation. The potential victims of the traffickers are becoming more aware of sex trafficking as compared to before.
As discussed below, practitioners reported that the proportions of trafficked women in the Turkish market have substantially decreased due to changes in law, increased awareness, and women’s experience in the sex market. Some of them estimated the current number of trafficked women at less than 1% of the market.
Factors Affecting the Composition of the Sex Market in Turkey
The practitioners noted that the changes in the composition of the Turkish sex industry can be attributed to legal reforms and corresponding changes on the ground, both in Turkey and in the source countries. They observed that many of the women who were deported or otherwise left Turkey eventually return, because the potential of high earnings in the illegal sex market often induces them to return. Several practitioners observed, Both trafficked and voluntary workers have become familiar with the Turkish sex market; they have learned the customer bases, and they have learned the business and how it is conducted. So, the experiences gained by trafficked sex workers while they were victimized help them to return and make money in the sex market.
Trafficked women who have been rescued and safely returned home encounter the same economic hardships and limited job options they faced before in their countries, incentivizing them to return to Turkey. With their experiences, even as victims, they may try to work on their own, although not always with success. Two NGOs staff members explained, Although forced prostitution only occurs in a small proportion of the sex market, some of the formerly trafficked women try to return to Turkey with the intention to work independently in the voluntary part of the market and return to their home countries after making sufficient money, but they are not able to find work on their own and fall into a pimp’s hands again. There are many examples of true-life stories of repeated victimization of these women.
Deported trafficked women who are prohibited from legally entering the country find ways to return to work in Turkey. A police official, who interviewed numerous foreign sex workers, elaborated, After being apprehended by the police, trafficked workers are deported to their home countries and prohibited from returning to Turkey for two years [administrative punishment for a foreigner performing a prostitution act in Turkey]. But they return to Turkey in illegal ways. These women can easily change their surnames using the courts, or pay money to corrupt officials, and change one of the letters in their surnames. Then they can obtain a new passport and visa under a false name. They then come back to Turkey; they can cross the border without any questions being asked.
Registration and border security systems of the countries involved facilitate the reentry of these trafficked women to Turkey, without being detected as violators. A police official commented, . . . Previous experiences indicated that there are no social security numbers for personal identification in source countries. Additionally, the existing Turkish border data system cannot detect when the information in the passport was changed. Turkey should implement a fingerprint and iris detection system for border security. Voluntary sex workers have already been fingerprinted by the police.
Networking plays an important role in the growth of the Turkish sex industry. Trafficked and voluntary sex workers tend to choose a destination country that was previously tested by their relatives, acquaintances, or neighbors—trustworthy persons who can easily and successfully recruit potential workers. A police official noted that there is an increasing network among women in both source and destination countries. The number of women in the sex market depends on this network and grows like a snowball. For example, if a woman in a source country has a friend in Spain or Turkey, she goes there and works with her.
Former sex workers become entrepreneurs, contacting other women in their home country and recruiting them for sex work. As one NGO staff noted, these experienced women, with their success stories, “have an easier time convincing young women and girls in their home country than the male traffickers who come with false job promises.” Both police officers and NGO staff of various organizations observed that deported women do not always return alone, they may also bring new women, including relatives or friends, to work within their network. Being part of a network has a really significant impact on the decision of women in source countries to go abroad to find a job.
Becoming a recruiter is particularly appealing as sex workers get older. The practitioners observed that with advanced age, many women found it difficult to work in the industry. Foreign women with a sufficient number of customers and an established network in the sex market become madams or panderers. An NGO staff member observed, “When voluntary workers become older and start to lose their attractive physical appearance, they become a boss and work with the recruited young women.”
The Impact of Legal Reform and Law Enforcement Practices on the Turkish Sex Industry
The law enforcement professionals attributed the changes in the sex market—the decreasing number of trafficked women, and the increase in working women’s agency—to legal reform. Adding forced prostitution to the definition of human trafficking and harsher penalties for sexual exploitation (as well as for forced labor, human smuggling, and illegal organ transplantation) have sent a clear message about Turkey’s determination to combat these crimes. This message has affected traffickers’ behavior, as one police officer commented: In one of the sex trafficking investigations, we pursued a small organized group which was transporting foreign women from Moldova and Ukraine. One of the transcribed wiretapping conversations between the panderer in Turkey and the trafficker in Ukraine indicated that the boss of this small criminal group was aware of the harsh punishment for this crime. He warned the trafficker “. . . I do not want the problematic girls.”
A senior police official elaborated on the newly instituted law enforcement investigation techniques: Law enforcement officials investigate sex trafficking cases meticulously. In addition to the statements of the victim, police use legally defined victim criteria, such as being forced to perform sex work, signs of physical violence on the body, as well as wiretapping evidence and other technical equipment.
These investigative powers facilitated by the antitrafficking law increase the effectiveness of prosecutions of sex trafficking offenses, as described by the prosecutor: . . . The new changes in the TPC allow law enforcement officials, upon presentation of specified court documents, to conduct a seizure of immovables and receivables [real estate and bank accounts, Article 128], wiretapping of communications [Article 135], pursuit by technical equipment [Article 140], and forced confiscation of all properties of an escaped suspect when the suspect resists showing up in court [Article 248].
Specialized training courses for those who combat trafficking, and continuous in-service updates in light of traffickers’ adaptation to the new laws, have also helped in combating sex trafficking. A police official explained, We have tried to expand the definition of a victim for identification purposes because of the changing tactics of the traffickers and panderers. There are criteria to identify victims, those things that indicate a woman is being forced into sex work. For example, ill-fitting clothes may indicate that the clothes were bought by traffickers. Trafficked women constantly come and go places with, or under the control of, a companion, while voluntary sex workers can leave their lodgings by themselves.
The judge summarized the impact of the new approach as follows: “Law enforcement officials are now more successful in identifying the victim and detecting traffickers and panderers than before, because of the technical support and in-service training they receive.” He also noted the antitrafficking law deterrent effect: “The mandatory sentence for forced prostitution is clearly defined in Article 80 of the new Criminal Code. The conviction of traffickers and panderers for sex trafficking carries a mandatory sentence of eight to twelve years imprisonment.”
Law enforcement officials also claimed that the combined effect of new police investigative powers, better training in identifying victims of sex trafficking, and harsh penalties for traffickers has led to reductions in sex trafficking activities and decreasing numbers of trafficked women. The prosecutor asserted, “Law enforcement officials effectively combat sex trafficking. Huge numbers of traffickers have been arrested in Turkey . . .”
NGO staff members, on the contrary, raised doubts about the impact of the law and law enforcement practices on the number of trafficked women in the sex market, finding the decrease an artifact of police enforcement practices and resources. Two NGO staffers agreed that the problem that law enforcement officials have is how to identify these women. The officials are losing interest in this phenomenon. They may be reluctant to identify a victim of forced prostitution because they will have to spend more time, need more resources, and have to provide more protection for this victim, than they do when investigating and prosecuting other crimes.
Several practitioners noted the difficulty of describing a typical sex trafficking victim. Victimization signs depend on the case, and change over time, as both traffickers and sex workers adapt their behavior to the new conditions on the ground. In the face of harsh penalties, traffickers have changed their tactics in handling the women, using “soft power” to compel them to work, instead of sheer force. A police official stated, Now many traffickers are in jail and their lieutenants attempt to fill the gaps, but they have connections with the arrested traffickers and pimps. They are aware of the possible risk of this crime. As a consequence, they have changed their tactics.
An NGO staff member noted that the traffickers employ new tactics to handle trafficked women, allowing them to have more control over their lives: They are no longer confiscating the women’s passports, they are now paying them for their work, and they have abandoned the use of physical violence. Instead they are now using psychological coercion methods on the women. They try to obtain a mutual agreement from the women rather than coercing them.
An NGO staff member, who had interviewed more than 300 victims, elaborated on the new tactics employed by the traffickers: Some of the traffickers and panderers use experienced prostitutes who work for them to persuade and to motivate newcomers to cooperate with them. The prostitute explains her situation, “I was like you the first time I came here but now I make money. It is too hard to make money with honor. When you have your money and go back home, nobody will ask you how you made it.” The victim will get only one chance to believe her and agree to work for them. If they do not cooperate, they are beaten until they do.
Women who do not cooperate, protest their working conditions, or are reluctant to work are not kept in Turkey but are trafficked to other destinations in the criminal network. The judge commented, “Turkey is cracking down. The traffickers and panderers of trafficked women face harsh punishment of at least eight years prison time. Therefore, they send these uncooperative women to rich Arab countries.”
Discussion and Conclusion
The data reveal the factors affecting foreign women’s decisions to migrate to Turkey. Poverty and unemployment in their home countries push women to find work elsewhere, and the prospects of finding better paying jobs in neighboring or nearby countries incentivizes them to make the move (see also Bales, 2006). The women who became sex workers in the Turkish sex industry did not necessarily seek out or plan to become sex workers, yet they ended up doing sex work either as trafficked victims or following a rational decision to enter the market.
The pathways that bring foreign women to the Turkish sex industry are varied: Some who arrive as tourists, to trade, or engage in services such as domestic help, learn about the potential for higher earnings in the Turkish sex industry, and seek such work. Others have been sex workers in their home countries, and migrate to Turkey for the higher pay the Turkish sex market offers. Many rescued trafficked foreign women who, while coerced to work, have learnt the way the Turkish sex industry functions return to Turkey as voluntary or semivoluntary sex workers. Some demonstrate entrepreneurship and recruit others, or reach agreements with third parties regarding their work schedules, venues, or pay.
The findings demonstrate that foreign sex workers exhibit different levels of agency, ranging from being totally coerced (trafficked) to being in control over their work situation, with many shades in between. Women’s agency, the data suggest, far from being a binary of voluntary versus coerced, is contingent, fluid, and changes over time. It is shaped by economic and cultural considerations, political events, and legal reforms, which in turn affect foreign women’s conditions of work, their preferred destination country, and degree of freedom at work. Practical considerations such as geographical proximity, ease and cost of travel, visa regulations, combined with prior experience in a specific sex market, social networks of fellow countrypersons, familiarity with the language and culture, and preference for a certain type of clientele, all play a role in women’s decisions to migrate and participate in the sex industry.
The study also suggests that, over time or within the same time period, foreign women’s level of agency may change from coerced to voluntary or vice versa. Some women who were rescued or deported to their home countries return to Turkey voluntarily, having learnt the market and acquiring experience as involuntary workers. Other women, who were semivoluntary workers but have not lived up to the terms of their agreement with their middlemen or panderers, may be forced to work, becoming involuntary sex workers.
The findings also demonstrate how changes in public policy (visa permits, legal reforms, rigorous law enforcement, awareness campaigns in source countries) have altered the composition and social organization of the Turkish sex industry, including foreign women’s level of control over their work circumstances. Legal reforms and efforts to combat sex trafficking have affected the numbers of traffickers arrested and victims rescued. Enhanced awareness campaigns in prospective victims’ home countries, coupled with stringent enforcement of Turkish sex trafficking laws, have reduced the numbers of trafficked foreign women. In addition, enforcement of antitrafficking laws has improved the work conditions of foreign sex workers, expanding their control over their work conditions. Trafficked women have particularly benefited, as traffickers have replaced the use of sheer force with persuasion or “soft power” when inducing women to work.
This study has limitations, as studies of sex workers—a highly hard-to- reach population—commonly do (Zhang, 2009). First, the data source is comprised of a relatively small sample of practitioners working with foreign sex workers in different capacities and roles. The practitioners’ interviews may not reflect the full spectrum of foreign sex workers circumstances, experiences, and views; many women working in the sex industry do not become known to officials, and others are cautious in providing complete information to law enforcement or even NGOs. Some significant roles in the legal system that enforce trafficking and illegal prostitution laws were represented by a single interviewee. Further research is needed to confirm the findings, particularly the variations in level of agency foreign sex workers exhibit over time and space.
Lastly, as recent regional political upheavals (e.g., the Syrian war and consequently the refugees’ problem) and newly emerging security risks (e.g., ISIS terrorism) have altered law enforcement priorities and government resource allocation, the impact of such events on the Turkish sex industry and its sex workers calls for additional research. Such research will further uncover the multiple and diverse factors influencing migrant women’s agency and the challenges they face in gaining control over their lives.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
