Implementing a Recovery Capital Model Into Therapeutic Courts: Case Study and Lessons Learned

Abstract

Recovery capital is a strengths-based and multi-level model for examining the process and outputs of recovery and desistance. Recovery capital posits that the more positive resources one accrues, the better the chances of recovery. Oftentimes growth of one’s recovery capital must be initiated through identifying programs in the community to create supportive scaffolding: this may be especially true for individuals involved in the justice system who may experience additional barriers to accessing programming. This manuscript presents the results of a pilot evaluation of the REC-CAP, a recovery-capital oriented system of measurement, planning, and engagement in two drug treatment courts. We include a description of the implementation process and results from surveys and focus groups with the court staff. Results suggests that the trainings were useful and that court staff meaningfully engaged with the REC-CAP system. Court staff felt the REC-CAP provided important information about court clients’ strengths and barriers and suggested next steps for staff to take to guide their clients. Future work should explore how the REC-CAP score profile may change with client progress through the court phases as well as how to incorporate more system level supports for a REC-CAP orientation among probation officers and other court staff.

Keywords

care planning drug treatment court evaluation recovery recovery capital therapeutic jurisprudence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belenko

LaPollo

A. B.

Gesser

Weiland

Perron

Johnson

I. D.

(2021). Augmenting substance use treatment in the drug court: A pilot randomized trial of peer recovery support. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 131, 108581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108581

Best

(2015). The Australian life in recovery survey. Turning Point, Eastern Health.

Best

Albertson

Irving

Lightowlers

Mama-Rudd

Chaggar

(2015). The UK life in recovery survey 2015: The first national UK survey of addiction recovery experiences. Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice, Sheffield Hallam University. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/12200

Best

Edwards

Cano

Durrance

Lehman

White

(2018, June). Strengths planning for building recovery capital. Counselor Magazine, 32–37.

Best

Hennessy

E. A.

(2021). The science of recovery capital: Where do we go from here? Addiction, 117(4), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15732

Best

Irving

Collinson

Andersson

Edwards

(2017). Recovery networks and community connections: Identifying connection needs and community linkage opportunities in early recovery populations. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 35(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2016.1256718

Best

Ivers

J.-H.

(2021). Inkspots and ice cream cones: A model of recovery contagion and growth. Addiction Research and Theory, 30(3), 155–161.

Best

Wheatley

(2019). Definitions of recovery. Prison Service Journal, 242, 3–8.

Bradshaw

Atkinson

Doody

(2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 2333393617742282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282

10.

Cano

Best

Edwards

Lehman

(2017). Recovery capital pathways: Modelling the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.002

11.

Collinson

Best

(2019). Promoting recovery from substance misuse through engagement with community assets: Asset based community engagement. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221819876575

12.

Dennis

M. L.

Foss

M. A.

Scott

C. K.

(2007). An eight-year perspective on the relationship between the duration of abstinence and other aspects of recovery. Evaluation Review, 31(6), 585–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X07307771

13.

Eddie

Vilsaint

C. L.

Hoffman

L. A.

Bergman

B. G.

Kelly

J. F.

Hoeppner

B. B.

(2020). From working on recovery to working in recovery: Employment status among a nationally representative U.S. sample of individuals who have resolved a significant alcohol or other drug problem. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 113, 108000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108000

14.

Facchin

Margola

(2016). Researching lived experience of drugs and crime: A phenomenological study of drug-dependent inmates. Qualitative Health Research, 26(12), 1627–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617443

15.

Geser

LaPollo

A. B.

Peters

A. J.

Weiland

Belenko

Perron

(2022). “To be part of the fully functional team, there need to be clear roles”: Peer recovery specialists provide benefits to drug court despite role challenges. Journal for Advancing Justice, IV, 23–52.

16.

Gill

Jones

Ghosal

Scanlan

J. M.

Cox

E. J.

(2022). Housing and reentry: A mixed-method evaluation of a low-cost community-based intervention for increasing access to housing post-incarceration. Journal for Advancing Justice, IV, 53–64.

17.

Goldstein

P. J.

(1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 15(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204268501500406

18.

Granfield

Cloud

(1999). Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York University Press.

19.

Granfield

Cloud

(2001). Social context and “natural recovery”: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Substance Use & Misuse, 36(11), 1543–1570. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-100106963

20.

Green

Rempel

(2012). Beyond crime and drug use: Do adult drug courts produce other psychosocial benefits? Journal of Drug Issues, 42(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612446592

21.

Groshkova

Best

White

(2012). The assessment of recovery capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review, 32(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00489.x

22.

Groshkova

Best

William

(2011). Recovery Group Participation Scale (RGPS): Factor structure in alcohol ad heroin recovery populations. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 6(1–2), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2011.571132

23.

Hall

Best

Musgrove

(2019). Recovery and communities: The role of structure in stable addiction recovery and desistance. In Farrall

(ed.), The architecture of desistance (pp. 229–248). Routledge.

24.

Hamilton

S. L.

Maslen

Best

Freeman

O’Donnell

Reibel

Mutch

Watkins

(2020). Putting ‘justice’ in recovery capital: Yarning about hopes and futures with young people in detention. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9(2), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1256

25.

Härd

Best

Sondhi

Lehman

Riccardi

(2022). The growth of recovery capital in clients of recovery residences in Florida, USA: A quantitative pilot study of changes in REC-CAP profile scores. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 17(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00488-w

26.

Harding

D. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Wyse

J. J. B.

(2019). On the outside. The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/O/bo34250377.html

27.

Harris

P. A.

Taylor

Thielke

Payne

Gonzalez

Conde

J. G.

(2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

28.

Hora

H. P. F.

(2002). A dozen years of drug treatment courts: Uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Substance Use & Misuse, 37(12–13), 1469–1488. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014419

29.

Hora

H. P. F.

Schma

H. W. G.

Rosenthal

J. T. A.

(1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(2), 439–538.

30.

Institute of Behavioral Research. (2009a). TCU pre-training needs and attitudes (TCU WEVAL D4-PNOC). Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. ibr.tcu.edu

31.

Institute of Behavioral Research. (2009b). TCU workshop evaluation forms (TCU WEVAL). Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. ibr.tcu.edu

32.

Kelly

J. F.

Greene

M. C.

(2013). Beyond motivation: Initial validation of the commitment to sobriety scale. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.06.010

33.

Krentzman

A.R.

Tillman

Staab

Banerjee

(2019, June 22-26). Experiences of recovery from alcohol and substance use disorders, and access to recovery-oriented systems of care, in rural and small-town Minnesota [Poster presentation]. Research Society on Alcoholism annual meeting, Minneapolis, MN. Abstract published in Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 43(S1).

34.

Lipsey

M. W.

Cullen

F. T.

(2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3(1), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833

35.

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (n.d.). Criminal justice DrugFacts. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/criminal-justice

36.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2018). Table 6.32A—Substance use disorder in past year among persons aged 18 or older, by past year probation and parole/supervised release statuses and demographic characteristics: Numbers in thousands, 2017 and 2018.

37.

The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001

38.

Wexler

(2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An overview. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 17, 125.

39.

Wexler

D. B.

Winick

B. J.

(2008). Therapeutic jurisprudence. In Ries

Miller

Fiellin

Saitz

(Eds.), Principles of addiction medicine (4th ed., 1519). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1101507

40.

Wheatley

(2019). Promoting recovery in prison. Prison Service Journal, 242, 11–17.