Private and Public Prisons: A Comparison of Costs,Programs and Facilities

Abstract

This article compares three privately operated prisons with three publicly operated prisons in an effort to learn which is run more efficiently. Through a comparative cost analysis of private and public prisons the author found that the private prisons provided more services at lower cost than their public counterparts. Factors that may have contributed to this include: increased economies when purchasing goods; less bureaucratic red tape; better control over resources; more flexible manpower usage; and the ability to build prisons quickly.

The author concluded from the findings of this study that comparative cost analyses and possible future research on the privatization of prisons will support the argument by proponents of prison privatization that private operation ofprisons is a worthwhile endeavor.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Camp, C. and Camp G. (1984). Private Sector Involvement in Prison Services and Operations. National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

Camp, C. and Camp G. (1985). TheReal Cost of Corrections. Criminal Justice Institute, South Salem, New York.

Cikens, W. (1986). Privatization of the American Prison System: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 2, 445-465.

Clear, T. and Cole, G. (1986). Corrections. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publications Co.

Collins, W. (1987). Privatization: Some Legal Considerations From A Neutral Perspective. American Jails, 1, No. 2, 28-34.

Dunham, D. (1986). Inmates rights and the Privatization of Prisons. Columbia Law Review, 86, 1475-1504.

Fenton, J. (1985). No Moratorium For Private Prisons. The Privatization Review, 1, No. 2, 21-24.

Hatry, H. P. (1979). Efficiency Measurementfor Local Government Services, Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.

Hornblum, A. (1985). Are We Ready For Privatization Of America's Prisons? The Privatization Review, 1, No. 2, 25-29.

10.

Leban, J. (1985). The Pennsylvania Prison Debate. The Privatization Review, 1, No. 2, 20-21.

11.

Levinson, R. (1985). Private Sector Operation of a Correctional Institution. National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.

12.

Logan, C. (1985). Competition in the Prison Business. Freeman, 35, 469-478.

13.

Mayer, C. (1986). Legal Issues Surrounding Private Operation of Prisons. Criminal Law Bulletin, 22, No. 4, 309-325.

14.

Moore, S. (1987). Contracting Out. In S. Hanke (Ed.), Prospects For Privatization. New York: Academy of Political Science

15.

Mullen, J. (1985). Corrections and the Private Sector. The Privatization Review, 1, No. 2, 10-19.

16.

Nissen, T. (1985). Free Market Prisons. The Nation, 241, No. 7, 194-194.

17.

Pennsylvania State Department of Public Welfare . (1986 and 1987). Children, Youth and Families Bulletin. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Dept. of Welfare, (April 30, 1987, November 14, 1986 and November 15, 1985).

18.

Privatization in Pennsylvania Prison System. (1985). Legislative Budget and Finance Committee, Pennsylvania State Legislature, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

19.

Robbins, I. (1986). Privatization of Corrections, Judicature, 69, 325-331.

20.

Savas, E. (1982). Privatizing The Public Sector. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.

21.

Swart, S. (1982). Private Sector Corrections in the 1980's: Some Notes. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation, 7, 79-82.

22.

Turnbull, W. and Witte, A. (1982). Determinants of the Costs of Operating Large Scale Prisons and Implications for the Costs of Correctional Standards. Law and Society Review, 16, No. 1, 115-134.