A number of assistive technologies exist to help older people with their indoor mobility needs and there is an increasing recognition that older people are capable of being critical and active consumers of these technologies. This paper reports on a study that used focus groups and informal trials to explore older people's perspectives on their indoor mobility problems, their ideas on what assistive technologies might resolve these problems and their evaluation of assistive technologies that were developed in response to these ideas.
The analysis of the results from the four focus groups led to the development of a stair-climbing aid and a new cataloguing aid. The analysis of the results from the informal trials produced useful feedback on the design of the two products and indicated some limitations to the focus group methodology which could be addressed in future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallingerCPayneS (2000) Falling from grace or into expert hands? Alternative accounts about falling in older people. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (12), 573–79.
2.
BarneaT (1994) Technology and ageing: research aims of the JBC-Brookdale Institute. In: BarneaTSternE, eds. Technology and ageing. Jerusalem: JBC-Brookdale Institute.
3.
BrickfieldCF (1984) Attitudes and perceptions of older people toward technology. In: RobinsonPKLivingstonKBirrenJE eds. Ageing and technological advances. New York: Plenum Press.
4.
ClemsonLCusickAFozzardsC (1999) Managing risk and exerting control: determining follow-through with falls prevention. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21 (12), 531–41.
5.
ColemanR (1998) Improving the quality of life for older people by design. In: GraafmansJTiapaleVChanessN, eds. Gerontechnology: a sustainable investment in the future. Netherlands: IOS Press.
6.
Department of Health (2001) National service framework for older people: executive summary. London: HMSO.
7.
Department of Trade and Industry (2000) Avoiding slips, trips and broken hips. Step up to safety. Available at http://www.preventinghomefalls.gov.uk Accessed on 19 May 2001.
8.
EhnP (1993) Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. In: SchulerDNamiokaA, eds. Participatory design: principles and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
HillLDHaslamRABrooke-WavellKHowarthPASloaneJE (2000) How do older people use their stairs?Working with Older People, 4 (4), 24–27.
10.
KinnSGallowayL (2000) Do occupational therapists and physiotherapists teach elderly people how to rise after a fall?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (6), 251–59.
11.
LebbonCBoessS (1998) Wellbathing. In: PorreroI PlacenciaBallabioE, eds. Improving the quality of life for the European citizen. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
12.
MackenzieLBylesJHigginbothamN (2000) Designing the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST): selecting the items. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (6), 260.
13.
MartinJMeltzerHElliotD (1988) The prevalence of disability among adults. OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain, Report 1. London: HMSO.
14.
MartinJWhiteAMeltzerH (1989) Disabled adults: services, transport and employment. OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain, Report 4. London: HMSO.
15.
McCormickWKaneKShawD (1999) Assessment made EASY. Nursing Standard, 13 (22), 24–25.
16.
MollenkopfHMeyerSSchulzeEWurmSFriesdorfW (2000) Technik im Haushalt zur Unterstutzung einer selbstbestimmten Lebensfuhrung im Alter. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologies und Geriatrie, 23, 155–68.
17.
MorganDIKruegerRA (1997) Focus group kit, Volumes 1–6. London: Sage.
18.
NayakUSL (1998) Design participation by the thousand elders. In: GraafmansJTiapaleVChanessN, eds. Gerontechnology: a sustainable investment in the future. Netherlands: IOS Press.
19.
PoulsonDAshbyMRichardsonS (1996) USERfit — a practical handbook on user-centred design for assistive technology. TIDE, ESC-EC-EAEC. Brussels, Luxembourg: European Commission.
20.
RietsemaJMelenhorstA-S (1998) User involvement in gerontechnology: early stage user-understanding to empower technology development. In: PorreroI PlacenciaBallabioE, eds. Improving the quality of life for the European citizen. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
21.
SalminenA-LPetrieH (1998) Evaluating assistive technology prototypes: laboratory or real life contexts? In: PorreroI PlacenciaBallabioE, eds. Improving the quality of life for the European citizen. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
22.
SandhuJS (1998) What is design for all? In: PorreroI PlacenciaBallabioE, eds. Improving the quality of life for the European citizen. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
23.
SternE (1994) Technology, ageing and disability: from theory to practice. In: BarneaTSternE, eds. Technology and ageing. Jerusalem: JBC-Brookdale Institute.
24.
ThorntonP (2000) Older people speaking out. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
25.
World Health Organisation (1999) ICIDH-2: International classification of functioning and disability, beta-2 draft. Geneva: WHO.
