Limited evidence is available to support knowledge of the time-frame and capacity for fitness to drive after mild traumatic brain injury. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what methods and assessments are, or could be used to determine fitness to drive for this population.
Method
We undertook a systematic search of six electronic databases. Two authors rated all studies for methodological content and quality, and standardised data were extracted. Narrative analysis was conducted to understand the content of eligible studies.
Findings
A total of 2022 articles were retrieved; seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Self-reported questionnaires, non-standardised assessments, questionnaires completed by next-of-kin, and simulator tests were the primary methods used to determine fitness to drive. Only one assessment has been used to aid recommendations about fitness to drive in the acute hospital setting. Six additional standardised assessments were identified that have the potential to predict fitness to drive in this population group; however, these assessments require further psychometric testing prior to use.
Conclusion
While a variety of methods and assessments are currently used, there is little research evidence to suggest when individuals are able to return to driving after mild traumatic brain injury. Research is urgently required to determine a consistent and standardised approach to assessing fitness to drive following mild traumatic brain injury.
AhlgrenELundqvistANordlundA (2003) Neurocognitive impairment and driving performance after coronary artery bypass surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery23(3): 334–340.
2.
AlexandersenADalenKBronnickK (2009) Prediction of driving ability after inconclusive neuropsychological investigation. Brain Injury23(4): 313–321.
3.
AsimakopulosJBoychuckZSondergaardD (2012) Assessing executive function in relation to fitness to drive: A review of tools and their ability to predict safe driving. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal59(5): 402–427.
4.
Austroads (2012) Assessing fitness to drive: For commercial and private vehicle drivers, Sydney: Austroads.
5.
BottariCLamotheMPGosselinN (2012) Driving difficulties and adaptive strategies: The perception of individuals having sustained a mild traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Research and Practice2012: 9.
6.
BrookeMMQuestadKAPattersonDR (1992) Driving evaluation after traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation71(3): 177–182.
7.
CarrollLJCassidyJDHolmL (2004) Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: The WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine43(Supplement): 113–125.
8.
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (2009) OCEBM levels of evidence. Available at:
http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025
(accessed 1 December 2013).
9.
ClassenSLevyCMcCarthyD (2009) Traumatic brain injury and driving assessment: An evidence-based literature review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy64(5): 580–591.
10.
DiegelmanNMGilbertsonADMooreJL (2004) Validity of the clock-drawing test in predicting reports of driving problems in the elderly. BMC Geriatrics4: 10–16.
11.
DownsSHBlackN (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health52(6): 377–384.
12.
FiskGDSchneiderJJNovackTA (1998) Driving following traumatic brain injury: Prevalence, exposure, advice and evaluations. Brain Injury12(8): 683–695.
13.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR (1975) Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research12: 189–198.
14.
HawleyCA (2001) Return to driving after head injury. Journal of Neurology. Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry70(6): 761–766.
15.
KayLGBundyACClemsonL (2012) Contribution of off-road tests to predicting on-road performance: A critical review of tests. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal59(1): 89–97.
16.
KreutzerJSLivingstonLAEverleyRS (2009) Caregivers’ concerns about judgement and safety of patients with brain injury: A preliminary investigation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation1(8): 723–728.
17.
KrishnasamyCUnsworthCA (2011) Normative data, preliminary inter-rater reliability and predictive validity of the Drive Home Maze Test. Clinical Rehabilitation25(1): 88–95.
18.
KrishnasamyCUnsworthCA (2012) Validity of the Occupational Therapy-Drive Home Maze Test for right and left handed test takers. Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention49: 274–277.
19.
MazerBLKorner-BitenskyNASoferS (1998) Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation79(7): 743–750.
20.
McCreaMIversonGLMcAllisterTW (2009) An integrated review of recovery after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): Implications for clinical management. The Clinical Neuropsychologist23(8): 1368–1390.
21.
MooreCLeathemJ (2004) Information provision after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): A survey of general practitioners and hospitals in New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal117(1201): 1–9.
22.
OrtolevaCBruggerCVan der LindenM (2012) Prediction of driving capacity after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation27(4): 302–313.
23.
OswanskiMFSharmaOPRajSS (2007) Evaluation of two assessment tools in predicting driving ability of senior drivers. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation86(3): 190–199.
24.
PreeceMHWHorswillMSGeffenGM (2010) Driving after concussion: The acute effect of mild traumatic brain injury on drivers’ hazard perception. Journal of Neuropsychology24(4): 493–503.
25.
ReitanRM (1986) Trail Making Test manual for administration and scoring, Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
26.
SchneiderJJGouvierWD (2005) Utility of the UFOV test with mild traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology12(3): 138–142.
27.
ShulmanKI (2000) Clock-drawing: Is it the ideal cognitive screening test?International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry15(6): 548–561.
28.
SheaBJGrimshawJMWellsGA (2007) Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology7(10): 1–7.
29.
SoderstromSTPetterssonRPLeppertJ (2006) Prediction of driving ability after stroke and the effect of behind-the-wheel training. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology47(5): 419–429.
30.
StuttsJCStewartJRMartellC (1998) Cognitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population. Journal of Accident Analysis & Prevention30(3): 337–346.
31.
SveenUOstensjoSLaxeS (2013) Problems in functioning after a mild traumatic brain injury within the ICF framework: The patient perspective using focus groups. Disability and Rehabilitation35(9): 749–757.
32.
UcEYRizzoMAndersonSW (2006) Driving with distraction in Parkinson disease. Neurology67(10): 1774–1780.
33.
UnsworthCABakerATaitzC (2012) Development of a standardised Occupational Therapy Driver Off-road Assessment (OT-DORA) battery to assess older and/or functionally impaired drivers. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal59(1): 23–36.
34.
UnsworthCALovellRKTerringtonNS (2005) Review of tests contributing to the occupational therapy off-road driver assessment. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal52(1): 57–74.
UnsworthCAPallantJFRussellK (2011b) Inter rater reliability of the Road Law and Road Craft test as part of the OT-DORA Battery for off-road driver assessment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy74(8): 394–398.
37.
VrkljanBHMcGrathCELettsLJ (2011) Assessment tools for evaluating fitness to drive: A critical appraisal of evidence. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy78(2): 80–96.
