This paper explores the way dominant discourses, and their associated practice knowledge dimensions, shape personal paradigms and occupation-based practice in mental health workplaces.
Method
Narrative inquiry methods and narrative thematic analysis was used to explore the career stories of nine occupational therapists who had worked in mental health practice for more than five years.
Findings
The main narrative themes to emerge were (i) living with the biomedical practice knowledge discourse, (ii) living with the psychological practice knowledge discourse and (iii) reflection as a strategy for maintaining occupation-based practice. These discourses created the need to reflect on practice and adopt strategies to avoid the marginalisation of occupational perspectives and occupation-based practice. The strategies used to cope with these discourses varied from acceptance and embracing of other discourses to resistance and rejection.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that in some mental health workplaces there is a danger that occupational perspectives and occupation-based practice can become marginalised. Making visible the different discourses in mental health practice allows occupational therapists to analyse, better understand, and live with the tensions in their professional lives. This requires professional support strategies to be in place to maintain occupation-based practices and retain practitioners in the workforce.
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
Ashby SE (2013) An exploration of the different forms of theoretical knowledge valued and used by occupational therapists in mental health practice. PhD Dissertation, University of Newcastle, Australia.
3.
AshbySERyanSGrayM (2013) Factors that influence the professional resilience of occupational therapists in mental health practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal60(2): 110–119.
4.
Australian Health Ministers (2003) National Mental Health Plan 2003–2008. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government.
5.
BartlowPHartwigC (1989) Status of practice in mental health: Assessment and frames of reference. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal36(4): 180–192.
6.
BazeleyP (2007) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo, London: Sage Publications.
7.
BennettSToothLMcKennaC (2003) Perceptions of evidence-based practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal50(1): 13–22.
8.
BjörklundA (1999) Focus on occupational therapists' paradigms. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences13(3): 165–170.
9.
CeramidasDM (2010) A case against generalisation of mental health occupational therapy in Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal57(6): 409–416.
10.
DuffyRNolanP (2005) A survey of the work of occupational therapists in inpatient mental health services. Mental Health Practice8(6): 36–41.
11.
Fisher AG (2014) Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 21(S1): 96–107.
12.
FortuneT (2000) Occupational therapists: is our therapy truly occupational or are we merely filling gaps?British Journal of Occupational Therapy63(5): 225–230.
13.
FortuneTFitzgeraldMH (2009) The challenge of interdisciplinary collaboration in acute psychiatry: Impacts on the occupational milieu. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal56(2): 81–88.
14.
FoucaultM (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Brighton: Harvester Press.
15.
GibsonRWD'AmicoMJaffeL (2011) Occupational therapy interventions for recovery in the areas of community integration and normative life roles for adults with serious mental illness: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy65(3): 247–256.
16.
GillenAGreberC (2014) Occupation-focused practice: Challenges and choices. British Journal of Occupational Therapy77(1): 39–41.
17.
GrayMClarkMPenmanM (2012) New graduate occupational therapists feelings of preparedness for practice in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal59(6): 445–455.
18.
GubaELincolnY (1984) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
HaglundLEkbaldhEThorellL-H (2000) Practice models in Swedish psychiatric occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy7(3): 107–113.
20.
HodgettsSHollisVTriskaO (2007) Occupational therapy students' and graduates' satisfaction with professional education and preparedness for practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy74(3): 148–160.
21.
HollowayIFreshwaterD (2007) Narrative Research in Nursing, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
22.
KinsellaEAWhitefordGE (2009) Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: Towards epistemic reflexivity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal56(4): 249–258.
23.
LarkinCCallaghanP (2005) Professionals' perceptions of interprofessional working in community mental health teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care19(4): 338–346.
24.
LloydCKingRBassettH (2002) A survey of Australian mental health occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy65(2): 88–96.
25.
LloydCKingRMcKennaK (2004) Generic versus specialist clinical work roles of occupational therapists and social workers in mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry38(3): 119–124.
26.
LloydCKingRMcKennaK (2007) The challenge of working in mental health settings: Perceptions of newly graduated occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy70(11): 460–470.
27.
MackeyH (2007) ‘Do not ask me to remain the same’: Foucault and the professional identities of occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal54(2): 95–102.
28.
McLaughlin GrayJ (1998) Putting occupation into practice: occupation as ends, occupation as means. American Journal of Occupational Therapy52(5): 354–365.
29.
MischlerEG (1986) Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
MolineuxM (2011) Standing firm on shifting sands. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy58(1): 21–28.
31.
NolanEHewisonA (2008) Teamwork in primary care mental health: A policy analysis. Journal of Nursing Management16(6): 649–661.
32.
RickwoodD (2004) Recovery in Australia: slowly but surely. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health3(1): 8–10.
33.
ScanlanJStillMStewartK (2010) Recruitment and retention issues for occupational therapists in mental health: Balancing the pull and the push. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal57(2): 102–110.
34.
SheldonB (2000) Cognitive behavioural methods in social care: a look at the evidence. In: StepneyPFordD (eds) Social Work Models, Methods and Theories, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishers.
35.
TownsendE (1998) Good Intentions Overruled: A Critique of Empowerment in the Routine Organisation of Mental Health Services, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
36.
TownsendEWilcockA (2004) Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy71(2): 75–87.
37.
UptonDStephensDWilliamsB (2014) Occupational therapists' attitudes, knowledge, and implementation of evidence-based practice: A systematic review of published research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy77(1): 24–38.
38.
WengrafT (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographical Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods, London: Sage Publications.
39.
WhitefordGEWilcockAA (2001) Centralizing occupation in occupational therapy curricula: Imperative of the new millennium. Occupational Therapy International8(2): 81–85.
