Enhancing occupational performance in the virtual context using smart technology

Abstract

Statement of context

Physical limitations restrict occupational performance in the virtual context for people with cervical spinal cord injuries.

Critical reflection on practice

A review of smart device goals in 10 health care records at one hospital identified three types of occupational therapy intervention. Compensation involved alternative methods of physical access, positioning, and customisation of devices. Acquisition involved providing opportunities for learning and overcoming challenges. Education and training sought to empower users and their families to use smart devices successfully.

Implications for practice

Occupational therapists need to incorporate virtual occupations and the use of personal smart devices within current practice. This requires keeping abreast of mainstream technology advances as well as providing clients with opportunities and support within the virtual context.

Keywords

Mobile technologies iPad iPhone smart device hand held computers touch screen devices spinal cord injury

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Occupational Therapy Association (2013) Apps for occupational therapy: Find apps for your practice area. Available at: www.aota.org/apps (accessed 8 July 2014).

Anthony L, Kim Y and Findlater L (2013) Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 27 April–2 May, pp. 1223–1232, Paris: ACM. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2466158 (accessed 1 November 2014).

AOTA (2014) (2014) Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process, 3rd edition. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68: S1–S48.

Atkins

(2014) Spinal cord injury. In: Radomski

Trombly Latham

(eds) Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (7th ed.), Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, pp. 1168–1214.

Burwash

Cook

(2014) Connected and mobile: Social media tools and apps for occupational therapy and mental health appplications. OT Practice 19(5): CE1–CE8.

Cook

Polgar

(2012) Essentials of Assistive Technologies, St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/Mosby.

Fager

Burnfield

(2013) Patients’ experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: Opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 9(2): 121–127.

Fisher

(2009) Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model, Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press Inc.

Folan

Barclay

Cooper

(2015) Exploring the experience of clients with tetraplegia utilizing assistive technology for computer access. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 10(1): 46–52.

10.

Kirshblum

Burns

Biering-Sorensen

(2011) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 34(6): 535–546.

11.

Larsson Lund

Lövgren-Engström

Lexell

(2011) Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: Experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 6(5): 402–411.

12.

Ofcom (2014) Adults’ media use and attitudes report 2014. Available at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/research-publications/adults/adults-media-lit-14/ (accessed 24 March 2015).

13.

Park

Howie-Esquivel

Dracup

(2014) A quantitative systematic review of the efficacy of mobile phone interventions to improve medication adherence. Journal of Advanced Nursing 70(9): 1932–1953.

14.

Rakoski

Ferguson

(2013) The virtual context of occupation: Integrating everyday technology into everyday practice. OT Practice 18(9): CE1–CE8.

15.

Scherer

(2005) Living in the State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities, 4th ed. Brookline, Massachusetts: Brookline Books.

16.

Somers

(2010) Spinal Cord Injury: Functional Rehabilitation (3rd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ; Harlow: Pearson Education.

17.

Trewin S, Swart C and Pettick D (2013) Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 21–23 October, Bellevue, Washington.

18.

Verdonck

Ryan

(2008) Mainstream technology as an occupational therapy tool: Technophobe or technogeek? British Journal of Occupational Therapy 71(6): 253–256.

19.

Verdonck

McCormack

Chard

(2011) Irish occupational therapists’ views of electronic assistive technology. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 74(4): 185–190.

20.

Verdonck

Steggles

Nolan

(2014) Experiences of using an environmental control system (ECS) for persons with high cervical spinal cord injury: The interplay between hassle and engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 9(1): 70–78.