A Rasch analysis of the model of human occupation screening tool single observation form (MOHOST-SOF) in mental health

Abstract

Introduction

This study examined the psychometric properties of the model of human occupation screening tool single observation form.

Method

Clinical records were extracted pre- and post-treatment for 152 mental health service users. Data were model of human occupation screening tool single observation form scores and demographics. We investigated the form using Rasch analysis; we also present an analysis of change over time.

Results

We identified four misfitting items and evidence of instability with respect to change over time. After anchoring to adjust for unstable estimates, it was possible to measure client change, and there were significant differences in form scores pre–post treatment indicating client improvement in ability.

Conclusion

The study provides initial psychometric assessment of this version of the model of human occupation screening tool.

Keywords

Validity reliability effectiveness inpatient community intervention assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bond

Fox

(2007) Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brown

Shiels

Hall

(2001) A pilot community living skills group: An evaluation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 64: 144–150.

Forsyth

Mann

Kielhofner

(2005) Scholarship of practice: Making occupation-focused, theory-driven, evidence-based practice a reality. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 68: 260–268.

Forsyth

Parkinson

Kielhofner

(2011) The measurement properties of the model of human occupation screening tool and implications for practice. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy 58: 5–13.

Future Vision Coalition (2010) Opportunities for a New Mental Health Strategy, London: Future Vision Coalition.

Green

Schooler

Kern

(2011) Evaluation of functionally meaningful measures for clinical trials of cognition enhancement in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 168: 400–407.

Grimm

Meus

Brown

(2009) Meal preparation: Comparing treatment approaches to increase acquisition of skills for adults with schizophrenic disorders. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 29: 148–153.

Haley

McHorney

Ware

Jr (1994) Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47: 671–684.

Harvey

Reichenberg

Bowie

(2010) The course of neuropsychological performance and functional capacity in older patients with schizophrenia: Influences of previous history of long-term institutional stay. Biological Psychiatry 67: 933–939.

10.

Kielhofner

(2008) Introduction to the model of human occupation. In: Kielhofner

(ed.) A Model of Human Occupation: Practice and Application, 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

11.

Kielhofner

Fan

Morley

(2010) A psychometric study of the model of human occupation screening tool (MOHOST). Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy 20: 63–70.

12.

Kielhofner

Fogg

Braveman

(2009) A factor analytic study of the model of human occupation screening tool of hypothesized variables. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 25: 127–137.

13.

Kramer

Kielhofner

Lee

(2009) Utility of the model of human occupation screening tool for detecting client change. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 25: 181–191.

14.

Linacre JM (1997) Guidelines for rating scales and Andrich thresholds (MESA Research Note #2). Available at: www.rasch.org.rn2.htm.

15.

Linacre

(1998) Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? Journal of Outcome Measurement 2(3): 266–283.

16.

Linacre

(2002) Understanding Rasch measurement: Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement 3(1): 85–106.

17.

Linacre

(2005) WINSTEPS Rasch Measurement Computer Program (Version 3.65) [Computer software], Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.

18.

Merbitz

Morris

Grip

(1989) Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 70: 308–312.

19.

Pan

Fan

Chung

(2011) Examining the validity of the model of human occupation screening tool: Using classical test theory and item response theory. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 74(1): 34–40.

20.

Parkinson

Forsyth

Kielhofner

(2005) User’s Manual for the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool (MOHOST) Version 2.0, Chicago: University of Illinois.

21.

Redmond

(1985) Increasing self-care through improving decision making by long-term psychiatric clients. International Journal of Partial Hospitalization 3: 65–72.

22.

Smith

Wright

Rush

(2006) Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Psycho-Oncology 15(9): 817–827.

23.

Velozo

Kielhofner

Lai

(1999) The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 53: 83–90.

24.

Wolfe

Chiu

(1998) Measuring pretest-posttest change with a Rasch rating scale model. Journal of Outcome Measurement 3(2): 134–161.

25.

Wright

Linacre

(1989) Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 70: 857–860.

26.

Wright

Stone

(1979) Best Test Design, Chicago: Mesa Press.

27.

Wright

Linacre

(1994) Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 8: 370.

28.

Wright

Masters

(1982) Rating Scale Analysis, Chicago: MESA Press.

29.

Wright

(1996) Time 1 to time 2 comparison. Rasch Measurement Transactions 10: 478–479.