How sustainable development is understood in World Federation of Occupational Therapy policy

Abstract

Introduction

Sustainable development is used to tackle environmental crises affecting human survival. Many sectors endorse sustainable development as a guiding principle but the health sector is yet to incorporate it in an effective and coordinated manner. To support occupational therapy engagement, the World Federation of Occupational Therapy developed a policy outlining their position on sustainable development.

Method

The policy analysis method developed by Carol Bacchi (the ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’ approach) and elite interviewing of three members of the policy writing committee were used to explore how sustainable development is represented by the World Federation of Occupational Therapy and the effects of this representation.

Results

Analysis revealed that the World Federation of Occupational Therapy understands sustainable development as a set of principles and practices that demand cultural change. The policy links ‘Western’ cultural values and environmental crises and obliges occupational therapists, as ethical subjects, to take on new personal and professional values concerning knowledge, evidence and ethics.

Conclusion

Presently, occupational therapists adopting sustainable development principles may appear to be challenging unsustainable occupational therapy practices and expanding the parameters of professional ethics. Further research into the concept of the ethical subject and requirements necessary for the adoption of sustainable cultural values is suggested.

Keywords

Sustainable development environmental policy policy making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aberbach

Rockman

(2002) Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science and Politics 35(4): 673–676.

Aoyama

Hudson

Hoover

(2012) Occupation mediates ecosystem services with human well-being. Journal of Occupational Science 19(3): 213–225.

Bacchi

(2000) Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 21(1): 45–57.

Bacchi

(2009) Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?, New South Wales: Pearson Australia.

Ball

(1990) Politics and Policy Making in Education: Explorations in Policy Sociology, New York: Routledge.

Barney

(1980) The Global 2000 Report to the President: Entering the 21st Century, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

Bernauer

Mahon

(2005) Michel Foucault’s ethical imagination. In: Gutting

(ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault: Second Edition, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–175.

Caccia C (2001) The politics of sustainable development. Available at: www.sustreport.org/downloads/Caccia%20SD%20Politics.doc (accessed 25 August 2014).

Centre for Sustainable Healthcare (n.d.) OT Susnet. Available at: http://sustainablehealthcare.org.uk/occupational-therapy-sustainable-practice-network-ot-susnet/about-ot (accessed 21 September 2014).

10.

Deleuze G (1988) Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

11.

Drexhage

Murphy

(2010) Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012, New York: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

12.

El-murr (2010) Representing the problem of abortion: Language and the policy making process in the abortion law reform project in Victoria, 2008. The Australian Feminist Law Journal 33(1): 121–140.

13.

Foucault

(1985) The History of Sexuality Vol. 2. The Use of Pleasure, New York: Pantheon Books.

14.

Greenpeace (2010) Greenwashing. Available at: http://stopgreenwash.org/ (accessed 25 August 2014).

15.

Harvey

(2011) Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research 11(4): 431–441.

16.

Lather

(1986) Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange 17(4): 63–84.

17.

Lather

(1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern, New York: Routledge.

18.

Liamputtong

(2009) Qualitative Research Methods, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

19.

Orr

(2009) Down to the Wire: Confronting Climate Collapse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Persson

Erlandsson

L-K

(2014) Ecopation: Connecting sustainability, glocalisation and well-being. Journal of Occupational Science 21(1): 12–24.

21.

Robbins J (2012) On becoming ethical subjects: Freedom, constraint, and the anthropology of morality. Anthropology of this Century 5 (October). Available at: http://aotcpress.com/articles/ethical-subjects-freedom-constraint-anthropology-morality/ (accessed 10 December 2015).

22.

Rushford

Thomas

(2015) Disaster and Development: An Occupational Perspective, Oxford: Elsevier.

23.

Simó Algado

Cardona

(2005) The return of the corn men: An intervention project with a Mayan community of Guatemalan retornos. In: Kronenberg

Simó Algado

Pollard

(eds) Occupational Therapy without Borders: Learning from Ten Years as a Scholarly Community, Edinburgh: Elsevier, pp. 336–350.

24.

Simó Algado

Townsend

(2015) Eco-social occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 78(3): 182–186.

25.

United Nations (n.d.) We can end poverty 2015: Millennium development goals. Available at: www.un.org/millenniumgoals/bkgd.shtml (accessed 31 August 2013).

26.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2014a) Kyoto protocol. Available at: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php (accessed 21 September 2014).

27.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2014b) Copenhagen climate change conference, December 2009. Available at: http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_dec_2009/meeting/6295.php (accessed 10 November 2015).

28.

Wagman

(2014) How to contribute occupationally to ecological sustainability: A literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 21: 161–165.

29.

Whittaker

(2012) Sustainable global wellbeing: A proposed expansion of the occupational therapy paradigm. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 75(9): 436–439.

30.

Whittaker

Shann

(2013) Exploring the WFOT position statement on environmental sustainability. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 76(S1): 12–13.

31.

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

32.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2006) Position statement: Human rights. Available at: www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx (accessed 19 September 2014).

33.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2007) Occupational therapy – Professional autonomy. Available at: www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx (accessed 19 September 2014).

34.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2012a) Environmental sustainability, sustainable practice within occupational therapy. Available at: www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx (accessed 19 September 2014).

35.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2012b) Position statement: Competency and maintaining competency. Available at: www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx (accessed 19 September 2014).

36.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2012c) Position statement: International collaborative research in occupational therapy. Available at: www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx (accessed 19 September 2014).