Do current vocational evaluation practices in traumatic brain injury align with best practices? Strengths,challenges and recommendations

Abstract

Introduction

To support implementation of the Inter-professional Guideline for Vocational Evaluation Following Traumatic Brain Injury we compared current practices to best practices as outlined in the guideline.

Method

We recruited health/vocational professionals who do vocational evaluation of traumatic brain injury survivors to participate in qualitative semi-structured interviews. We also conducted a document review of internal clinical and provincial workers’ compensation insurance documents. All data were analyzed using directed content analysis.

Results

Thirteen individuals participated and three types of documents were reviewed. Practices that were found to be frequently aligned with the Inter-professional Guideline for Vocational Evaluation Following Traumatic Brain Injury included: (a) identification of evaluation purpose; (b) obtaining informed consent; (c) gathering background information; (d) assessing persistent symptoms and abilities; (e) analyzing and synthesizing results; and (f) developing return to work recommendations. Practices partially aligned included: (a) incorporating the worker’s perspectives into the evaluation; (b) observing work behaviors in naturalistic settings (c) assessing available supports; and (d) assessing occupational/job demands in context. Practices that did not align with the guideline included: (a) evaluation of the workplace environment and workplace supports; (b) accommodation potential; and (c) assessment of workplace safety.

Conclusion

To support implementation of the guideline and enhance successful vocational outcomes, additional attention and resources should be dedicated to evaluating workplace-based factors and assessing workplace-based risks.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury vocational evaluation return to work employment guidelines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

MacIntosh-Murray

Porcellato

(2008) Learning from high performing systems: Quality by design. In: Baker

MacIntosh-Murray

Porcellato

(eds) High Performing Healthcare Systems: Delivering Quality by Design, Toronto, ON: Longwoods Publishing, pp. 11–26.

Barisa

(2001) Neuropsychological evaluation applied to vocational rehabilitation. Neuro Rehabilitation 16(4): 289–293.

Bayley

Hurdowar

Richards

(2012) Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: Findings from a multi-site pilot project. Disability and Rehabilitation 34(19): 1633–1638.

Cabana

Rand

Powe

(1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association: Internal Medicine 282(15): 1458–1465.

Canadian Medical Association (CMA) (2007) Canadian Medical Association Handbook on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Available at: www.cma.ca//multimedia/CMA/Content_Images/CMAInfobase/EN/handbook.pdf (accessed 20 December 2010).

Carlsen

Glenton

Pope

(2007) Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: A meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. British Journal of General Practice 57(545): 971–978.

Dopson

FitzGerald

Ferlie

(2002) No magic target! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based. Health Care Management Review 27(3): 35–47.

Eccles

Grimshaw

(2004) Selecting, presenting and delivering clinical practice guidelines: Are they the magic bullet? Medical Journal of Australia 180: S52–S54.

Fadyl

McPherson

(2009) Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: A review of the evidence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 24(3): 195–212.

10.

Ferlie

Fitzgerald

Wood

(2005) The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal 48(1): 117–134.

11.

Francke

Smit

de Veer

(2008) Factors influencing implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta review. Implementation Science 8(38): 1–11.

12.

Graham

Logan

Harrison

(2006) Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26(1): 13–24.

13.

Guest

Bunce

Johnson

(2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1): 59–82.

14.

Hakkennes

Dodd

(2008) Guideline implementation in allied health professions: A systematic review of the literature. Quality and Safety in Health Care 17(4): 296–300.

15.

Hsieh

Shannon

(2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.

16.

Innes

Straker

(1998) A clinician’s guide to work-related assessments: 1 – Purposes and problems. Work 11(2): 183–189.

17.

Ivers

Jamtvedt

Flottorp

(2012) Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 6: CD000259.

18.

Lysaght

Wright

(2005) Professional strategies in work-related practice: Exploration of occupational and physical therapy roles and approaches. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 59(2): 209–217.

19.

Mays

Pope

(2000) Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 320(7226): 50–52.

20.

Muhr T (2010) ATLAS.ti [computer sofware]. Berlin, 6.2.

21.

Occupational Health and Safety Act, RSO (1990, c. O.1) Available at: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90o01.

22.

Palda

Davis

Goldman

(2007) A guide to the Canadian Medical Association Handbook on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal 177(10): 1221–1226.

23.

Parente

Stapleton

(1996) Vocational evaluation, training, and job placement after traumatic brain injury: Problems and solutions. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 7(3): 181–191.

24.

Ponsford

Downing

Olver

(2014) Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: Outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 31(1): 64–77.

25.

Saltychev

Eskola

Tenovuo

(2013) Return to work after traumatic brain injury: Systematic review. Brain Injury 27(13–14): 1516–1527.

26.

Solberg

Brekke

Fazio

(2000) Lessons from experienced guideline implementers: Attend to many factors and use multiple strategies. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 26(4): 171–188.

27.

Stergiou-Kita

(2010) Implementing clinical practice guidelines in occupational therapy practice: Recommendations from the research evidence. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 57(2): 76–87.

28.

Stergiou-Kita

Dawson

Rappolt

(2011) An integrated review of the processes and factors relevant to vocational evaluation following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 21(3): 374–394.

29.

Stergiou-Kita

Dawson

Rappolt

(2012a) Inter-professional clinical practice guideline for vocational evaluation following traumatic brain injury: A systematic and evidence-based approach. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 22(2): 166–181.

30.

Stergiou-Kita

Rappolt

Dawson

(2012b) Towards developing a guideline for vocational evaluation following traumatic brain injury: The qualitative synthesis of clients’ perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation 34(3): 179–188.

31.

Stergiou-Kita

Rappolt

Kirsh

(2009) Evaluating work readiness following acquired brain injury: Building a shared understanding. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 76(4): 276–284.

32.

Stergiou-Kita

Yantzi

Wan

(2010) The personal and workplace factors relevant to work readiness evaluation following acquired brain injury: Occupational therapists’ perceptions. Brain Injury 24(7–8): 948–958.

33.

van Velzen

van Bennekom

Edelaar

(2009) How many people return to work after acquired brain injury? A systematic review. Brain Injury 23(6): 473–488.

34.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) (2013) By the numbers: 2012 WSIB statistical report: Schedule 1 and 2. Available at: http://www.proergonomics.ca/uploads/files/2013%20WSIB-StatisticalReport_S1.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).

35.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) (2015a) Operational Policy Manual. Available at: http://www.wsib.on.ca/WSIBPortal/faces/WSIBManualLandingPage?fGUID=835502100635000476&_afrLoop=187721678576000&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=null#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3Dnull%26_afrLoop%3D187721678576000%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26fGUID%3D835502100635000476%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dr34igt34w_25 (1 February 2016).

36.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) (2015b) The Program of Care for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Available at: http://www.wsib.on.ca/WSIBPortal/faces/WSIBArticlePage?fGUID=835502100635000412&_afrLoop=187572134740000&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=null#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3Dnull%26_afrLoop%3D187572134740000%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26fGUID%3D835502100635000412%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dr34igt34w_4 (accessed 1 February 2016).