Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: Implications for occupational therapy

Abstract

Introduction

People with severe acquired brain injury often require lifetime support, sometimes received from paid workers if living in shared supported accommodation. Electronic assistive technology may offer a less intrusive method of support that can enable autonomous participation and deliver cost savings. However, research on rates, barriers, and facilitators of electronic assistive technology uptake is lacking. This study aimed to identify electronic assistive technology types used by people with acquired brain injury living in shared supported accommodation, assess user satisfaction and psychosocial impact of electronic assistive technology, detail the impact of technology use on respondents’ participation and support needs, and describe barriers and/or facilitators to electronic assistive technology uptake and ongoing use.

Method

Participants were identified electronic assistive technology users with acquired brain injury living in shared supported accommodation in Australia (N = 22). Mixed methods data were collected using semi-structured interviews and published measures of support need, electronic assistive technology satisfaction, and psychosocial impact.

Results

Participants reported satisfaction with the devices they used, and positive psychosocial outcomes. Areas impacted by electronic assistive technology, key facilitators and barriers to electronic assistive technology use, and implications for occupational therapists working to deliver electronic assistive technology solutions were identified.

Conclusion

Electronic assistive technology use by this group can positively influence both everyday functioning and participation. Skilled prescription and ongoing support services are necessary to maximise uptake and use.

Keywords

Acquired brain injury electronic assistive technology user satisfaction psychosocial outcomes supported accommodation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Access Economics Pty Limited (2009) The Economic Cost of Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury in Australia, Victoria, Australia: The Victorian Neurotrauma Initiative.

Beecham

Perkins

Snell

(2009) Treatment paths and costs for young adults with acquired brain injury in the United Kingdom. Brain Injury 23(1): 30–38.

Bradley

Curry

Devers

(2007) Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research 42(4): 1758–1772.

Braun

Clarke

(2013) Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners, London: SAGE.

Brummel-Smith

Dangiolo

(2009) Assistive technologies in the home. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 25(1): 61–77.

Callaway

Tregloan

Williams

(2016a) Evaluating access and mobility within a new model of supported housing for people with neurotrauma: A pilot study. Brain Impairment 17(1): 64–76.

Callaway

Winkler

Sloan

(2013) Models of supported accommodation for people with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review (Report No. 0513-022.024-R1B), Melbourne, Victoria: Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research.

Callaway

Winkler

Tippett

(2016b) The Community Integration Questionnaire – Revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 63(3): 139–220.

de Joode

van Boxtel

Verhey

(2012) Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: Exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Injury 26(10): 1257–1266.

10.

Demers

Weiss-Lambrou

Ska

(2002) The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology & Disability 14(3): 101–105.

11.

Gentry

(2009) Smart homes for people with neurological disability: State of the art. NeuroRehabilitation 25(3): 209–217.

12.

Harmer

Bakheit

(1999) The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their carers. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 62(9): 394–398.

13.

Jamwal R, Callaway L, Farnworth L and Winkler D (submitted) Using technology in supported accommodation following disability: rates and user characteristics.

14.

Jutai J and Day H (2002) Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability 14(3): 107–111.

15.

Kielhofner

(2008) Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application, Baltimore, MA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

16.

Krefting

(1991) Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45(3): 214–222.

17.

Larsson Lund

Lovgren-Engstrom

Lexell

(2011) Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: Experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 6(5): 402–411.

18.

Liamputtong

(2013) The science of words and the science of numbers: Research methods as foundations for evidence-based practice in health. In: Liamputtong

(eds) Research Methods in Health: Foundations for Evidence-Based Practice, 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–22.

19.

Linden

Lexell

Larsson Lund

(2011) Improvements of task performance in daily life after acquired brain injury using commonly available everyday technology. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 6(3): 214–224.

20.

National Disability Insurance Agency (2015) Assistive Technology Strategy, Canberra, Australia: National Disability Insurance Agency.

21.

National Disability Insurance Agency (2016) Planning to facilitate opportunities enabled under the NDIS. Available at: www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/governance/IAC/iac-advice-opportunities.

22.

Oddy

da Silva Ramos

(2013) Cost effective ways of facilitating home based rehabilitation and support. NeuroRehabilitation 32(4): 781–790.

23.

Ponsford

Sloan

Snow

(2013) Traumatic Brain Injury: Rehabilitation for Everyday Adaptive Living, Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.

24.

Richards

(2005) Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide, London: SAGE.

25.

Rigby

Ryan

Joos

(2005) Impact of electronic aids to daily living on the lives of persons with cervical spinal cord injuries. Assistive Technology 17(2): 89–97.

26.

Rispoli

Machalicek

Lang

(2014) Chapter 2: Assistive technology for people with acquired brain injury. In: Lancioni

Singh

(eds) Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities, New York: Springer, pp. 21–52.

27.

Scherer

(2012) Assistive Technologies and Other Supports for People with Brain Impairment, New York: Springer Publishing Company.

28.

Sloan

Callaway

Winkler

(2009) Changes in care and support needs following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment 10(3): 295–306.

29.

Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, et al. (2012) Accommodation outcomes and transitions following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment 13(1): 24–43.

30.

Sohlberg

Turkstra

(2011) Optimizing Cognitive Rehabilitation: Effective Instructional Methods, New York: Guilford Publications.

31.

Soo C, Tate R, Hopman K, et al. (2007) Reliability of the Care and Needs Scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 22(5): 288–295.

32.

Stickel

Ryan

Rigby

(2002) Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: Evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability & Rehabilitation 24(1–3): 115–125.

33.

Tate

(2004) Assessing support needs for people with traumatic brain injury: The care and needs scale (CANS). Brain Injury 18(5): 445–460.

34.

Tegart

Harvey

Livingstone

(2014) Assistive Health Technologies for Independent Living, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council of Learned Academies.

35.

Tregloan

Callaway

Meyer

(2014) RIPL Project One: Post-occupancy Built and Technology Design Evaluation, Melbourne, Australia: Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research.

36.

Verdonck

McCormack

Chard

(2011) Irish occupational therapists’ views of electronic assistive technology. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 74(4): 185–190.

37.

Wild

(2013) Assistive technology for cognition following brain injury: Guidelines for device and app selection. Perspectives on Neurophysiology & Neurogenic Speech & Language Disorders 23(2): 49–58.

38.

Winkler

Farnworth

Sloan

(2010) Comparison of people with ABI living in two accommodation settings: Shared supported accommodation and residential aged care. Brain Impairment 11(3): 313–325.

39.

World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF).

40.

World Health Organization (2004) Ageing and Health Technical Report, Kobe, Japan: WHO Centre for Health Development.