Successful recovery of upper extremity function after stroke is more likely when the affected limb is used regularly in daily life. We developed an iPad (Apple) application called the ‘Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand’ to facilitate daily upper extremity use. This study examined the suitability of items and pictures in the Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand, and tested a paper prototype of the application (which has since been produced).
Method
We used a Delphi method with 10 expert occupational therapists to refine the items in the aid. Next, we prepared pictures of items in the aid and confirmed their suitability by testing them with 10 patients (seven stroke, three cervical spondylotic myelopathy). Nine occupational therapists conducted field tests with a paper prototype of the aid in clinical practice to examine its utility.
Results
After four Delphi rounds, we selected 130 items representing activities of daily living, organized into 16 categories. Of 130 pictures, 128 were recognizable to patients as representing the intended activities. Based on testing of the paper prototype, we found the Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand process was suitable for clinical practice, and could be organized into six steps.
Conclusion
The Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand process may promote daily upper extremity use. This application, since developed, now needs to be clinically tested in its digital form.
AllyBABudsonAE (2007) The worth of pictures: Using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory. NeuroImage35(1): 378–395.
2.
AllyBAGoldCABudsonAE (2009) The picture superiority effect in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia47(2): 595–598.
3.
AllyBAWaringJDBethEH (2008) Aging memory for pictures: Using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect. Neuropsychologia46(2): 679–689.
4.
AtwalAMoneyAHarveyM (2014) Occupational therapists’ views on using a virtual reality interior design application within the pre-discharge home visit process. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(12): e283.
5.
BareccaSBohannonRWCharnessAL (2001) Management of the Post Stroke Hemiplegic Arm and Hand: Treatment Recommendations of the 2001 Consensus Panel, Ontario, Canada: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.
6.
BouvatLKangasAJSzczech MoserC (2014) iPad apps in early intervention and school-based practice. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools & Early Intervention7(1): 1–15.
7.
Che DaudAZYauMKBarnettF (2016) Integration of occupation based intervention in hand injury rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hand Therapy29(1): 30–40.
8.
CurranTDoyleJ (2011) Picture superiority doubly dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience23(5): 1247–1262.
9.
ElwynGO’ConnorAStaceyD (2006) International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aid: Online international Delphi consensus process. British Medical Journal333(7565): 417–419.
10.
EmbreeLMBudsonAEAllyBA (2012) Memorial familiarity remains intact for pictures but not for words in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia50(9): 2333–2340.
11.
FujiwaraYShinkaiSAmanoH (2003) Test–retest variation in the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence in community-dwelling older people independent in daily living toward individual assessment of functional capacity. [Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi]50(4): 360–367.
12.
GowlandCStratfordPWardM (1993) Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke24(1): 58–63.
13.
GrahamIDLoganJBennettCL (2007) Physicians’ intentions and use of three patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making7(1): 20.
14.
GummessonCAtroshiIEkdahlC (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: Longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders4(1): 11.
15.
GummessonCWardMMAtroshiI (2006) The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): Validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders7: 44.
16.
KleinRMBellB (1982) Self-care skills: Behavioral measurement with Klein-Bell ADL scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation63(7): 335–338.
17.
KoppBKunkelAFlorH (1997) The Arm Motor Ability Test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation78(6): 615–620.
18.
KurimotoS (2007) Validity and Reliability of the Hand 20. [Nihon Tegeka Gakkai Zasshi]24(2): 1–4.
19.
Lawton MP and Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3): 179–186.
20.
LorahERTincaniMDodgeJ (2013) Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities25(6): 637–649.
21.
MorrisDMTaubEMarkVW (2006) Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica42(3): 257–268.
22.
O’ConnorAMBennettCLStaceyD (2009) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Systematic Review3: CD001431.
23.
OttenbacherKJHsuYGrangerCV (1996) The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation77(12): 1226–1232.
24.
PollockAFarmerSEBradyMC (2014) Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Systematic Review11: CD010820.
25.
SaposnikGChowCMGladstoneD (2014) iPad technology for home rehabilitation after stroke (iHOME): A proof-of-concept randomized trial. International Journal of Stroke9(7): 956–962.
26.
ShepardRN (1967) Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior6(1): 156–163.
27.
ShiYXTianJHYangKH (2011) Modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus traditional rehabilitation in patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation92(6): 972–982.
28.
SumsionT (1998) The Delphi technique: An adaptive research tool. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy61(4): 153–156.
29.
TakebayashiTAmanoSHanadaK (2015) A one-year follow-up after modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with paretic arm: A prospective case series study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation22(1): 18–25.
30.
TakebayashiTKoyamaTAmanoS (2013) A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: A pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation27(5): 418–426.
31.
TaubEUswatteGKingDK (2006) A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke37(4): 1045–1049.
32.
TaubEUswatteGMarkVW (2013) Method for enhancing real-world use of a more affected arm in chronic stroke: Transfer package of constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke44(5): 1383–1388.
33.
TomoriKNagayamaHSaitoY (2015) Examination of a cut-off score to express the meaningful activity of people with dementia using iPad application (ADOC). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology10(2): 126–131.
34.
TomoriKSaitoYNagayamaH (2013) Reliability and validity of individualized satisfaction score in aid for decision-making in occupation choice. Disability and Rehabilitation35(2): 113–117.
35.
TomoriKUezuSKinjoS (2012) Utilization of the iPad application: Aid for decision-making in occupation choice. Occupational Therapy International19(2): 88–97.
36.
UswatteGTaubEMorrisD (2005) Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke36(11): 2493–2496.
37.
WatanabeTKinoshitaSTakahashiC (2010) Further investigation of validity of the Paralytic arm Participation Measure (PPM) and its level of difficulty with each item. [Sagyo Ryoho Journal]44(6): 489–494.
38.
WhitingPRutjesAWReitsmaJB (2003) The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology3(Suppl 1): 25.
