Understanding those occupations outside the home that people with acquired brain injury find difficult, including the influencing factors, may help to develop appropriate support. The aim of this paper was to explore and describe how people with acquired brain injury experience engagement in occupations outside the home.
Method
This qualitative study included repeated semi-structured interviews with eight working-age persons with acquired brain injury, which were analysed by a constant comparison analysis.
Findings
The findings indicated that there were three influencing factors that had a critical effect on the participants’ changes in their engagement in occupations, the strategies they adopted, and the consequences for their lives. The categories reflected how the different changes in occupations outside the home were influenced by their struggles with sensory processing and fatigue, difficulties with completing preparations, and occupational risks.
Conclusion
The findings indicate that to improve engagement in occupations outside the home for people with acquired brain injury, professionals need to identify the different factors that are critical for each person’s engagement. The findings also indicate the importance of considering not only occupations outside the home but also preparations required at home and recovery afterward, and how engagement outside the home is influenced by the entire occupational repertoire.
AlmborgAUlanderKThulinA (2010) Discharged after stroke – Important factors for health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Nursing19(15–16): 2196–2206.
2.
CiceroneKD (2004) Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation19(6): 494–501.
3.
ErikssonGKottorpABorgJ (2009) Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine41(3): 187–194.
4.
ErikssonGThamKBorgJ (2006) Occupational gaps in everyday life 1–4 years after acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine38(3): 159–165.
5.
ErlandssonLPerssonD (2014) ValMo-modellen: ett redskap för aktivitetsbaserad arbetsterapi. [ValMo Model: A Tool for Occupation-Based Occupational Therapy], Lund: Studentlitteratur.
6.
FallahpourMKottorpANygårdL (2015) Participation after acquired brain injury: Associations with everyday technology and activities in daily life. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy22(5): 366–376.
7.
GustafssonLBootleK (2013) Client and carer experience of transition home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation35(16): 1380–1386.
8.
HäggströmALundML (2008) The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine40(2): 89–95.
9.
HammelJJonesRGossettA (2006) Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation13(3): 43–58.
10.
HollowayIWheelerS (2013) Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare, 3th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
JohanssonUHögbergHBernspångB (2007) Participation in everyday occupations in a late phase of recovery after brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy14(2): 116–125.
12.
KielhofnerG (2008) Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
13.
KruppLBLaRoccaNGMuir-NashJ (1989) The fatigue severity scale: Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Archives of Neurology46(10): 1121–1123.
14.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2014) Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. [The Qualitative Research Interview (Interviews)], 3rd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
15.
LindénALexellJLarsson LundM (2011) Improvements of task performance in daily life after acquired brain injury using commonly available everyday technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology6(3): 214–224.
16.
LindqvistEBorellL (2010) The match between experienced difficulties in everyday activities after stroke and assistive technology for cognitive support. Technology and Disability22(3): 89–98.
17.
McLeanAMJarusTHubleyAM (2014) Associations between social participation and subjective quality of life for adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation36(17): 1409–1418.
18.
MagasiSWongAGrayDB (2015) Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation96(4): 569–577.
19.
MalinowskyCLarsson-LundM (2015) The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-age people with acquired brain injury to use it. British Journal of Occupational Therapy79(1): 26–34.
20.
NasreddineZSPhillipsNABédirianV (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society53(4): 695–699.
21.
NicholsonSSniehottaFFWijckF (2013) A systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. International Journal of Stroke8(5): 357–364.
22.
O’SullivanCChardG (2010) An exploration of participation in leisure activities post-stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal57(3): 159–166.
23.
PatersonBScott-FindlayS (2002) Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qualitative Health Research12(3): 399–409.
24.
PatomellaAJohanssonKThamK (2009) Lived experience of driving ability following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation31(9): 726–733.
25.
PerssonDErlandssonLEklundM (2001) Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation – A tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy8(1): 7–18.
26.
ReistetterTAAbreuBC (2005) Appraising evidence on community integration following brain injury: A systematic review. Occupational Therapy International12(4): 196–217.
27.
RisserRLexellEBellD (2015) Use of local public transport among people with cognitive impairments – A literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour29: 83–97.
28.
SarreSRedlichCTinkerA (2014) A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: Lessons for the study of resilience. Disability and Rehabilitation36(9): 716–726.
29.
SingamAYtterbergCThamK (2015) Participation in complex and social everyday activities six years after stroke: Predictors for return to pre-stroke level. PloS ONE10(12): 1–12.
30.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
van de PortIGKwakkelGSchepersVP (2007) Is fatigue an independent factor associated with activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in chronic stroke?Cerebrovascular Diseases23(1): 40–45.
32.
Van VelzenJVan BennekomCEdelaarM (2009) How many people return to work after acquired brain injury? A systematic review. Brain Injury23(6): 473–488.
33.
WalshMEGalvinRLoughnaneC (2014) Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Disability and Rehabilitation37(18): 1599–1608.
34.
WhiteJHGrayKRMaginP (2012) Exploring the experience of post-stroke fatigue in community dwelling stroke survivors: A prospective qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation34(16): 1376–1384.
35.
WilsonJLPettigrewLETeasdaleGM (1998) Structured interviews for the Glasgow outcome scale and the extended Glasgow outcome scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma15(8): 573–585.
