Artificial intelligence in occupational therapy: Comparing ChatGPT and occupational therapist approaches in assessment and intervention

Abstract

Introduction:

Artificial intelligence is playing an increasingly important role in supporting rehabilitation processes, offering benefits for both clients and therapists. This study aimed to explore the potential use of ChatGPT—an AI-powered online chatbot—in occupational therapy using clinical case scenarios and to compare the clinical decision-making approaches of ChatGPT and occupational therapists.

Method:

This study employed a comparative design to evaluate the clinical decision-making skills of ChatGPT and occupational therapists. A total of 111 occupational therapists and ChatGPT responded to 9 questions related to 3 different cases, including items on models and frames of reference, assessment, and intervention.

Results:

ChatGPT and occupational therapists demonstrated similar decision-making in one case for models and frames of reference, one case for assessments, and one case for interventions (p > 0.05). However, their decision-making differed in the other two cases (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

These findings underscore artificial intelligence’s promising yet complex role in occupational therapy, highlighting how occupational therapists integrate multiple factors and individual client needs into their decision-making, in contrast to the algorithm-based reasoning of ChatGPT.

Keywords

artificial intelligence chatGPT clinical reasoning evaluation occupational therapy intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alanzi

Alharthi

Alrumman

, et al. (2024) ChatGPT as a psychotherapist for anxiety disorders: An empirical study with anxiety patients. Nutrition and Health. Epub ahead of print 7 October 2024. DOI: 10.1177/02601060241281906.

Al-Lawama

Kumwenda

(2023) Decreasing the options’ number in multiple choice questions in the assessment of senior medical students and its effect on exam psychometrics and distractors’ function. BMC Medical Education 23: 212.

Angelov

Soares

Jiang

, et al. (2021) Explainable artificial intelligence: An analytical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 11: e1424.

Avello-Sáez

Estrada-Palavecino

(2023) ChatGPT and its impact on competence training in occupational therapists: A reflection on academic integrity. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional 31: e3534.

Barchéus

I-M

Ranner

Månsson Lexell

, et al. (2024) Occupational therapists’ experiences of using a new internet-based intervention-a focus group study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 31: 2247029.

Bekbolatova

Mayer

Ong

, et al. (2024) Transformative potential of AI in Healthcare: Definitions, applications, and navigating the ethical landscape and public perspectives. Healthcare 12: 125.

Biswas

(2023) Role of chat GPT in public health. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 51: 868–869.

Boop

Cahill

Davis

, et al. (2020) Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process fourth edition. AJOT: American Journal of Occupational Therapy 74(S2): 1–85.

Cascella

Montomoli

Bellini

, et al. (2023) Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: An analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Journal of Medical Systems 47: 33.

10.

Chapparo

Ranka

(2008) Clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions 3: 265–277.

11.

Crameri

Tschuschke

Koemeda

, et al. (2020) The therapists’ training and their attitudes towards therapy as predictors of therapeutic interventions. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 50: 67–76.

12.

Creek

(2009) Occupational therapy defined as a complex intervention: A 5-year review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 72: 105–115.

13.

Gold

(2014) DSM-5 and the assessment of functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 42: 173–181.

14.

Grünebaum

Chervenak

Pollet

, et al. (2023) The exciting potential for ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 228: 696–705.

15.

Haleem

Javaid

Qadri

, et al. (2022) Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for marketing: A literature-based study. International Journal of Intelligent Networks 3: 119–132.

16.

Hanna

Pantanowitz

Jackson

, et al. (2025) Ethical and bias considerations in artificial intelligence/machine learning. Modern Pathology 38: 100686.

17.

Song

Cao

, et al. (2024) Post intensive care syndrome: A review of clinical symptoms, evaluation, intervention. Heliyon 10: e31278.

18.

Hernigou

Scarlat

(2023) Two minutes of orthopaedics with ChatGPT: It is just the beginning; it’s going to be hot, hot, hot! International Orthopaedics 47: 1887–1893.

19.

Hoel

Zweck

Ledgerd

, et al. (2021) The impact of Covid-19 for occupational therapy: Findings and recommendations of a global survey. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin 77: 69–76.

20.

Hofmann

Guerra

, et al. (2024) The rapid development of artificial intelligence: GPT-4’s performance on orthopedic surgery board questions. Orthopedics 47: e85–e89.

21.

Hwang

N-K

Shim

S-H

Cheon

H-W

(2023) Digital learning designs in occupational therapy education: A scoping review. BMC Medical Education 23: 7.

22.

Keshavarz

Bagherieh

Nabipoorashrafi

, et al. (2024) ChatGPT in radiology: A systematic review of performance, pitfalls, and future perspectives. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 105: 251–265.

23.

Lacaita

Galijasevic

Swoboda

, et al. (2025) The accuracy of ChatGPT-4o in interpreting chest and abdominal X-ray images. Journal of Personalized Medicine 15: 194.

24.

Lecler

Duron

Soyer

(2023) Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: Current applications, future possibilities and limitations of ChatGPT. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 104: 269–274.

25.

Levkovich

Elyoseph

(2023) Identifying depression and its determinants upon initiating treatment: ChatGPT versus primary care physicians. Family Medicine and Community Health 11: e002391.

26.

Maksimoski

Noble

Smith

(2024) Does Chat GPT answer otolaryngology questions accurately? Laryngoscope 134: 4011–4015.

27.

Maruyama

Sasada

Jinbo

, et al. (2021) A concept analysis of clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. Asian Journal of Occupational Therapy 17: 17–25.

28.

Mika

Martin

Engstrom

, et al. (2023) Assessing ChatGPT responses to common patient questions regarding total hip arthroplasty. JBJS 105: 1519–1526.

29.

Mittal

Dhar

(2023) Use of ChatGPT by physicians to build rehabilitation plans for the elderly: A mini-review of case studies. Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics 19: 86–93.

30.

Murray

Turpin

Edwards

, et al. (2015) A qualitative meta-synthesis about challenges experienced in occupational therapy practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 78: 534–546.

31.

Nori

King

McKinney

, et al. (2023) Capabilities of gpt-4 on medical challenge problems. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.13375.

32.

Novak

Te Velde

Hines

, et al. (2021) Rehabilitation evidence-based decision-making: The READ model. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2: 726410.

33.

OpenAI (2023) Creating safe AGI that benefits all of humanity. https://openai.com/ (accessed 2 July 2025).

34.

Oztermeli

(2023) ChatGPT performance in the medical specialty exam: An observational study. Medicine 102(32): e34673.

35.

Peng

Wang

Liang

, et al. (2023) AI-ChatGPT/GPT-4: An booster for the development of physical medicine and rehabilitation in the new era! Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 1–5.

36.

Prud’homme-Généreux

(2015) Case study: A step-by-step guide to students writing case studies (and Tools for Novice Case Authors). Journal of College Science Teaching 44: 57–73.

37.

Rahlin

(2024) Common intervention strategies and techniques. Physical Therapy for Children With Cerebral Palsy. Routledge, pp.249–261.

38.

Rathore

(2023) Future of AI & generation alpha: ChatGPT beyond boundaries. EDUZONE: International Peer Reviewed/Refereed Multidisciplinary Journal (EIPRMJ), ISSN.

39.

Raymond

Stevens

Bucak

(2019) The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: Application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors. Advances in Health Sciences Education 24: 141–150.

40.

Robertson

(2012) Critical thinking and clinical reasoning in new graduate occupational therapists: A phenomenological study. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. Available at: http://openair.rgu.ac.uk (accessed 2 July 2025).

41.

Saglam

Uludag

Karaduman

, et al. (2025) Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence models GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 in clinical decision-making in sports surgery and physiotherapy: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 25: 163.

42.

Sharma

Yadav

(2022) Chat GPT–A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System 14: 46–51.

43.

Shoenbill

Kasturi

Mendonca

(2023) Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing. In: Daaleman

Helton

(eds) Chronic Illness Care: Principles and Practice. Springer, pp.469–479.

44.

Stokel-Walker

(2022) AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry? Nature.

45.

Strong

DiGiammarino

Weng

, et al. (2023) Chatbot vs medical student performance on free-response clinical reasoning examinations. JAMA Internal Medicine 183: 1028–1030.

46.

Sumner

Lim

Chong

, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 102693.

47.

Suthar

Kounsal

Chhetri

, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology: A deep dive into ChatGPT 4.0’s accuracy with the American Journal of Neuroradiology’s (AJNR) “Case of the Month”. Cureus 15: e43958.

48.

Ullah

Hassan

Gill

, et al. (2024) Privacy preserving large language models: ChatGPT case study based vision and framework. IET Blockchain 4: 706–724.

49.

Wang

Ong

Wang

, et al. (2024a) Potential for GPT technology to optimize future clinical decision-making using retrieval-augmented generation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 52: 1115–1118.

50.

Wang

Wan

, et al. (2024b) Applications and concerns of ChatGPT and other conversational large language models in health care: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 26: e22769.

51.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) (2024) Occupational therapy response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Available at: https://wfot.org/resources/occupational-therapy-response-to-the-covid-19-pandemic (accessed 2 July 2025).

52.

Wong

Fisher

(2015) Comparing and using occupation-focused models. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 29: 297–315.

53.

Yiğit

Berşe

Dirgar

(2023) Yapay Zekâ Destekli Dil İşleme Teknolojisi Olan ChatGPT’nin Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Kullanımı. Eurasian Journal of Health Technology Assessment 7: 57–65.