Women face limitations in occupational participation due to intersecting social and structural factors, which negatively influence health and well-being. This systematic review examined how occupational therapy-based advocacy and occupational justice approaches have been applied to support women across diverse contexts.
Methods:
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, using 13 keywords across 4 databases. Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment and risk of bias were evaluated for all studies.
Findings:
Most studies were rated as high quality (n = 10), with the remainder rated as moderate (n = 5). The majority was qualitative (Level VI), with a small number of conceptual or theoretical studies (Level V), and overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The studies focused on women experiencing intersecting forms of marginalization, including disability, migration, violence, homelessness, and gendered and racialized inequities in employment. Three themes emerged: (1) individual-level empowerment, (2) societal and policy-level advocacy, and (3) professional responsibilities of occupational therapists. Overall, evidence was largely recommendation-based, with limited intervention-focused models.
Conclusions:
Integrating advocacy and occupational justice frameworks into clinical and community-based occupational therapy have the potential to enhance women’s occupational participation and inform future intervention development, education, and policy engagement.
AgnerJ (2017) Understanding and applying empowerment theory to promote occupational justice. Journal of Occupational Science24: 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1338190
2.
AllisonCB (1995) Women teachers and the struggle for occupational justice: Is feminism an answer?Counterpoints6: 47–69.
*BallouMBalogunOGittensG, et al (2015) Trauma and returning to work: Women’s lived experiences and its implications for vocational rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling46: 25–33. https://doi.org/110.1891/0047-2220.46.1.25
5.
*CageA (2007) Occupational therapy with women and children survivors of domestic violence: Are we fulfilling our activist heritage? A review of the literature. British Journal of Occupational Therapy70: 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260707000503
DominelliL (2017) Feminist social work theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
8.
*DyckIJongbloedL (2000) Women with multiple sclerosis and employment issues: A focus on social and institutional environments. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy67: 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740006700506
9.
*FisherGSHotchkissA (2008) A model of occupational empowerment for marginalized populations in community environments. Occupational Therapy in Health Care22: 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v22n01_05
10.
FrankG (2012) The 2010 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science: Occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice—Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science19: 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
11.
FrankG (1992) Opening feminist histories of occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy46: 989–999. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.11.989
12.
*GalvaanRPetersLSmithT, et al (2015) Employers’ experiences of having a live-in domestic worker: Insights into the relationship between privilege and occupational justice. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy45: 41–46. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a7
13.
GerlachAMagalhãesL (2024) Intersectionality: Feminist theorizing in the pursuit of justice and equity. In:TaffS (ed.) Philosophy and Occupational Therapy. Routledge, pp. 209–219.
14.
GoodkindSKimMEZelnickJR, et al (2021) Critical feminisms: Principles and practices for feminist inquiry in social work. Affilia36: 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099211043166
15.
GuptaJ (2016) Mapping the evolving ideas of occupational justice: A critical analysis. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health36: 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216672171
KirshBH (2015) Transforming values into action: Advocacy as a professional imperative. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy82: 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417415601395
19.
LongHAFrenchDPBrooksJM (2020) Optimising the value of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences1: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632084320947559
20.
*MalfitanoAPSDe SouzaRGMLopesRE (2016) Occupational justice and its related concepts: An historical and thematic scoping review. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health36: 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216669133
21.
*McNultyMCCroweTKKroeningC, et al (2009) Time use of women with children living in an emergency homeless shelter for survivors of domestic violence. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health29: 183–190. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20090914-06
22.
MethleyAMCampbellSChew-GrahamC, et al (2014) PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research14: 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
23.
MillerRJ (1992) Interwoven threads: Occupational therapy, feminism, and holistic health. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy46: 1013–1019. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.11.1013
24.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine151: 264–269. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.11.1013
25.
*MuñozJPCatalanoAWangY, et al (2020) Justice-based occupational therapy: A scoping review. Annals of International Occupational Therapy3: 162–174. https://doi.org/10.3928/24761222-20200924-02
26.
*MurthiKHammellKW (2021) ‘Choice’ in occupational therapy theory: A critique from the situation of patriarchy in India. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health44: 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1769182
27.
NilssonITownsendE (2010) Occupational justice—Bridging theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy17: 57–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903287182
28.
OktaviaTNuryatamaIArdyS, et al (2023) Social media influence on social justice. In: 2023 International conference on information management and technology (ICIMTech), 24–25 August 2023, pp. 760–765. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech59029.2023.10278018
29.
*ParcsiLCurtinM (2013) Experiences of occupational therapists returning to work after maternity leave. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal60: 252–259. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903287182
30.
*ParnellR (2024) Reflections of Black married working mothers managing occupational roles and racism. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health44(3): 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492231209681
31.
PizarroEEstrellaSFigueroaF, et al (2018) Understanding occupational justice from the concept of territory: A proposal for occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science25: 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1487261
32.
*Rivas-QuarnetiNMovilla-FernándezMJMagalhãesL (2018) Immigrant women’s occupational struggles during the socioeconomic crisis in Spain: Broadening occupational justice conceptualization. Journal of Occupational Science25: 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1366355
33.
SmithDLHiltonCL (2011) An occupational justice perspective of domestic violence against women with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science15: 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686621
34.
*SmithEWhiteP (2025) Gender, participation and attainment in STEM: A comprehensive overview of long-term trends in the United Kingdom. British Educational Research Journal51: 802–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4102
35.
*SmithYJStephensonSGibson-SatterthwaiteM (2014) The meaning and value of traditional occupational practice: A Karen woman’s story of weaving in the United States. Work45: 25–30. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131600
36.
TownsendE (2022) Bridging critical gaps in occupational justice and social justice in occupational therapy practices. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional30: e30202201. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoED302022012
37.
TownsendEMarvalR (2013) Can professionals actually enable occupational justice?Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional da UFSCar21: 215–222. https://doi.org/10.4322/cto.2013.025
38.
WallaceDK (2010) Evidence-based medicine and levels of evidence. American Orthoptic Journal60: 20–23. https://doi.org/10.3368/aoj.60.1.2
39.
WhitefordGTownsendE (2011) Participatory occupational justice framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. Occupational Therapies Without Borders2: 65–84.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
