Clinical Reasoning in Occupational Therapy: Idiosyncrasies in Content and Process

This article describes part of a research project that aims to examine the content and process of occupational therapists' reasoning. Thirty-eight experienced occupational therapists participated. This qualitative study gathered written text from the therapists, representing their thinking when presented with facsimiles of practice situations. Analysis of both the content of the reasoning and the component processes of the reasoning took place. The processes observed were similar to those observed in studies of medical problem solving. Some therapists demonstrated a rapid formulation of the problem, indicating the use of pattern recognition. There was also an element of hypothetico-deductive reasoning, as has been observed in medicine and physiotherapy. This article explores these findings, relating them to the research of other theorists in the field of reasoning and concluding with a discussion of some apparent idiosyncrasies in the participants' reasoning.