In the 1970s the community of Port Hope, Ontario was discovered widely contaminated with radioactive waste from a local refinery. Under conditions of mounting waste, inadequate remediation, growing publicity, and no compensation, the implications of the waste for property values manifested into intense social conflict. The author traced these tensions over the last 40 years, showing how the primacy of private property disintegrated social relations while securing political and economic power for the state. Indeed, the state is actively involved in the institution of private property, not simply in regulating property markets and upholding property ownership as a de facto component of capitalism, but in manipulating its disciplinary effects as a form of social control.
Anonymous (1976) “Letter to George A Kerr” and “Letter from George A Kerr” RG 12-45, 14 April, Minister of Environment Files, Box 140948, Archives Ontario.
2.
Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) (n.d.) RG 7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, B101648, Ontario Ministry of Labour Fonds, Archives Ontario.
3.
Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) (1976a) News release: 76-12.
4.
Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) (1976b) Progress Report on Radioactive Waste Investigation in Port Hope, Ontario, 19 February, RG 134 Eldorado Fonds, 1995 96/012, Box 6, File 1-460, Library and Archives Canada.
5.
Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) (1976c) Memorandum: Questions and Answers About Radon and Radon Daughters, 21 April, RG 60-8, Atomic Energy Control Board Fonds, 1993-94/093, Board Meeting Documents, File 76-38 to 77-22, Library and Archives Canada.
6.
Atomic Energy Control Board (AECB) (1976d) News release 76-5, AECB releases report on radioactivity in Port Hope, 26 May, RG 60-8, Atomic Energy Control Board Fonds, 1993-94/093, Board Meeting Documents, File 76-38 to 77-22:8, Library and Archives Canada.
7.
Atomic Energy Control Limited (AECL) (2012) Real Estate Market Analysis Port Hope Ward 1: 2001–2011, Ottawa.
8.
Aulakh R (2011) Tough sell. Toronto Star, 10 June.
9.
Auditor General of Canada (2012) Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Government of Canada, Ottawa.
10.
Austen A (1981) 5 months later, radioactive soil still near homes. The Globe and Mail, 13 April.
11.
BlomleyN (2003) Law, property, and the geography of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annals of the American Association of Geographers93(1): 121–141.
12.
BlomleyN (2005) The borrowed view: Privacy, propriety, and the entanglements of property. Law and Social Inquiry30(4): 617–661.
13.
BlomleyN (2008) Simplification is complicated: Property, nature, and the rivers of law. Environment and Planning A40: 1825–1842.
14.
BlomleyN (2010) Cuts, flows, and the geographies of property. Law, Culture and the Humanities7(2): 203–216.
15.
BlomleyN (2014) Making space for property. Annals of the Association of American Geographers104(6): 1291–1306.
16.
BothwellR (1984) Eldorado: Canada’s National Uranium Company, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
17.
Bullard R (2000) Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
BurdReport (2014) This is getting dangerous. Avaiable at: http://burdreport.ca/?p=735 (accessed 31 March 2012).
19.
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (2009) Understanding Health Studies and Risk Assessments Conducted in the Port Hope Community from the 1950s to the Present. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
20.
Canadian Press (1980) “Radioactive site won’t be public” typeface indicates. Port Hope Evening Guide. 28 November.
CornishCV (1997) Behind the crumbling walls: The re-working of a former asylum's geography. Health and Place3(2): 101–110.
23.
de Kennedy JN (1950) History of the Department of Munitions and Supply: Canada in the Second World War, Volume 1, Productions Branches and Crown Companies. Canada: King’s Printer and Controller of Stationery.
Editorial (1999) A time to choose what we stand for. The Crier. 18 November.
26.
Eldorado (1976a) N.M. Ediger to Mr. Gillespie, 31 March, Presidents Comments: Annual (Eldorado) Report 1975, R 1526, Energy, Mines, and Resources Fonds, Vol. 282, File 260-6, Eldorado 1975-76, Library and Archives Canada.
27.
Eldorado (1976b) Record of Radiation Survey, 23 March, RG 7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, B101648, Ontario Ministry of Labour Fonds, Archives Ontario.
28.
Energy, Mines and Resources (1976a) Alastair Gillespie to Mayor Hewson, 15 April, RG 60-8, Atomic Energy Control Board Fonds, 1993-94/093, Board Meeting Documents, File 76-38 to 77-22, Library and Archives Canada.
29.
Energy, Mines and Resources (1976b) Alastair Gillespie to Allan Prince: Legal Powers of AECB, 12 April, R1526 Energy, Mines, and Resources Files, Volume 324, Correspondence File 15, Library and Archives Canada.
30.
Energy, Mines and Resources (1980) The Structure of Canada’s Uranium Industry and its Future Market Prospects: Nuclear Policy Review Background Papers, Uranium and Nuclear Energy Branch, Energy Sector, Ottawa.
31.
Energy Probe (1976) Report on Port Hope Radioactivity Contamination, RG 60-8, Atomic Energy Control Board Fonds, 1993-94/093, Board Meeting Documents, File 76-38 to 77-22, Library and Archives Canada.
32.
FarishM (2010) The Contours of America’s Cold War, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
Federal-Provincial Task Force on Radioactivity (1977) Report of the Working Group on Resource Requirements, Fiscal year 1976–77, RG 12-45, Ministry of Environment Files, Box 140948, Archives Ontario.
34.
FletcherT (2002) Neighbourhood change at Love Canal: Contamination, evacuation and resettlement. Land Use Policy19: 311–323.
35.
FowlkesMMillerP (1987) Chemicals and community at Love Canal. In: JohnsonBCovelloV (eds) The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, Boston, MA: Reidel, pp. 55–78.
36.
FriedFEylesJ (2011) Welcome waste: Interpreting narratives of radioactive waste in two small towns in Ontario. Journal of Risk Research14(9): 1017–1037.
37.
GaventaJ (1982) Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
38.
GidwaniV (2008) Capital Interrupted: Agrarian Development and the Politics of Work in India, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
GottschallJ (1976) Little recourse in radon damage suits. Port Hope Evening Guide. 12 April.
40.
Government of Canada (2006) Screening Report: The Port Hope Long-Term Low Level Radioactive Waste Management Project, Ottawa: NRCan.
41.
Government of Canada (2009) An Agreement for the Cleanup and the Long-Term Safe Management of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Situate in the Town of Port Hope, the Township of Hope and the Municipality of Clarington. Ottawa: NRCan.
42.
GramsciA (1971 [1928]) Selections From the Prison Notebooks, New York, NY: International Publishers.
43.
GregoryRSlovicPFlynnJ (1996) Risk perceptions, stigma, and health policy. Health and Place2(4): 213–220.
44.
Hall S (1996) The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In: Chen KH and Morley D (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 25–46.
45.
Harries K (2008) Nuclear reaction: Accusations of cancerous fallout divide a small Ontario town. Walrus, March. Available at: http://thewalrus.ca/nuclear-reaction (assessed 8 May 2012).
46.
HarveyD (1976) The Marxian theory of the state. Antipode8: 80–89.
47.
KallinHSlaterT (2014) Activating territorial stigma: Gentrifying marginality on Edinburgh's periphery. Environment and Planning A46: 1351–1368.
48.
Kessel J (1981) Gone fission: Port Hope casts silent shadow on nuclear fears. The Toronto Star, 22 September.
MacLaren Lavalin (1981) Port Hope Low Level Waste Management Study: Report to AECB. MacLaren, April.
51.
MacPhersonCB (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: From Hobbes to Locke, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52.
MacPhersonCB (1978) Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
53.
MahA (2009) Devastation but also home: Place attachment in areas of industrial decline. Home Cultures6(3): 287–310.
54.
Makin K (1981) Anger is rekindled in Port Hope over radioactive soil. The Globe and Mail, September.
55.
MansfieldB (2007) Privatization: Property and the remaking of nature–social relations. Antipode9(3): 393–405.
56.
MarxK (1990 [1867]) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume One, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
57.
MascoJ (2006) The Nuclear Borderlands: The Manhattan Project in Post-Cold War New Mexico, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
McIlroy A (1999) Activist’s fight turns terribly personal. The Globe and Mail, 6 October.
59.
MesserKSchulzeWHackettKet al. (2006) Can stigma explain large property value losses? The psychology and economics of superfund. Environmental and Resource Economics33: 299–324.
60.
Ministry of Environment (1976a) W. Bidell to W.B. Drowley: Protection of New Construction from Radiation in Port Hope. 5 February, RG 12-45, Ministry of Environment Files, B255904, File Water Pollutants 1980 Radiation Port Hope, Archives Ontario.
61.
Ministry of Environment (1976b) D. Beveridge to R.M. Dillon: Protection of New Construction from Radiation in Port Hope, 12 January, RG12-45, Ministry of Environment Files, B255904, File Water Pollutants 1980 Radiation Port Hope, Archives Ontario.
62.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
Montagnes I (2007) Port Hope: A History. Ontario: Ganaraska Press.
64.
MountzA (2003) Human smuggling, the transnational imaginary, and the everyday geographies of the nation-state. Antipode35(3): 622–644.
Ontario Ministry of Health (OMH) (n.d.) Water Pollution: Welcome Residue Area, RG 134, Eldorado Nuclear Limited Fonds, Volume 162, File, 370, Library and Archives Canada.
69.
Ontario Ministry of Health (OMH) (1976) Aitken to [Owner], 10 May, RG 7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, Ontario Ministry of Labour Fonds, B101648, Archives Ontario.
70.
Ontario Ministry of Health (OMH) (1977) RG7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, B101636, Archives Ontario.
71.
Ontario Ministry of Labour (OML) (1976) RG 7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, B101636, Archives Ontario.
72.
Ontario Ministry of Labour (OML) (1977a) RG7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, B101636, Archives Ontario.
73.
Ontario Ministry of Labour (OML) (1977b) (Solicitors) to Ontario Ministry of Health, 27 June, RG 7-128, Port Hope Radiological Inspection Files, B101692, Archives Ontario.
74.
Ottawa Citizen (1981) Port Hope mishaps make long list, 19 October.
75.
PainterJ (2006) Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography25: 752–774.
