From contradiction to contrast in a countryside conflict: Using Q Methodology to reveal a diplomatic space for doing TB differently

Abstract

Environmental conflicts are often framed by an assumption that there are clear divisions between interested parties. As a result, there is a tendency to polarise debates, simplify arguments and miss opportunities for constructive engagement. While these conflicts are rarely amenable to resolution through direct dialogue, diplomacy may offer a means to generate possible political settlements. In this paper, we seek to identify the scope for such diplomacy in the seemingly entrenched conflict that surrounds the case of bovine tuberculosis and badger culling in England. First, we use Q methodological techniques to map prevailing views among concerned publics about this highly contentious and apparently intractable issue. Second, we combine this method with diplomatic theory in order to identify areas in which diplomatic modes of engagement may be constructive. Our results show that there are predictable conflictual elements within two positions organised around opposition to, and support for, the culling of badgers. These positions, which we label ‘ethical empiricist’ and ‘nostalgic autonomist’, respectively, are not always straightforwardly oppositional. Their points of contact, as well as intersections with a third, alternative, subject position, which we label ‘liberal pragmatist’, suggest starting-points for diplomacy.

Keywords

Badger cull biosecurity bovine TB diplomacy Q Methodology rural conflict subjectivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

APHA (2014) GB TB testing intervals. Animal and plant health agency. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/388446/pti-map.pdf (accessed 27 February 2015).

Badger Killers (2015) Available at: www.badger-killers.co.uk (accessed 23 June 2015).

Badger Trust (2011) Top world authority condemns badger cull. Available at: www.badgertrust.org.uk/news/posts/2011/top-world-authority-condemns-badger-cull.aspx (accessed 23 June 2015).

Badger Trust (2015) The cull – Key facts. Available at: http://badger.org.uk/threats/bovine-tb/the-cull-key-facts.aspx (accessed 23 June 2015).

Block

(1978) The Q-Sort Method, Springfield, IL: Thomas.

Bloomfield

Collins

Fry

et al. (2001) Deliberation and inclusion: Vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance? Environment and planning C: Government and Policy 19: 501–513.

Brown

(1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bulkeley

Mol

(2003) Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values 12: 143–154.

Burgess

Harrison

Filius

(1998) Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A 30: 1445–1460.

10.

Byrch

Milne

Morgan

et al. (2015) Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors’ diverse understandings of sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28: 671–705.

11.

Carter SP, Delahay RJ, Smith GC, et al. (2007) Culling-induced social perturbation in Eurasian badgers Meles meles and the management of TB in cattle: An analysis of a critical problem in applied ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274: 2769–2777.

12.

Cassidy

(2015) ‘Big science’ in the field: Experimenting with badgers and bovine TB, 1995–2015. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37: 305–325.

13.

Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research 1: 245–276.

14.

Cordingley

Webb

Hillier

(1997) Q methodology. Nurse Researcher 3: 3–45.

15.

Cuppen

Bosch-Rekveldt

MGC

Pikaar

et al. (2016) Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology. International Journal of Project Management 34: 1347–1359.

16.

DEFRA (2006) Public Consultation on Controlling the Spread of Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle in High Incidence Areas in England: Badger Culling: A Report on the Citizens’ Panels. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London, UK. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081107201922/http://defra.gov.uk/animalh/tb/pdf/citizens-panels.pdf (accessed 11 January 2017).

17.

DEFRA (2011) Bovine TB – Key Conclusions from the Meeting of Scientific Experts, Held at Defra on 4th April 2011. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs London, UK. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110911090544/http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/atoz/tb/documents/bovinetb-scientificexperts-110404.pdf (accessed 30 September 2015).

18.

DEFRA (2014a) Defra Bovine TB Citizen Dialogue: Online Engagement Report. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London, UK. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=11993_btb-citizen-dialogue-3_online-engagement-report.pdf (accessed 09 January 2017).

19.

DEFRA (2014b) Defra Bovine TB Citizen Dialogue: Public Dialogue Workshops. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. Available at: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=11992_btb-citizen-dialogue-2_public-workshops-report.pdf (accessed 09 January 2017).

20.

Donnelly

Woodroffe

Cox

et al. (2006) Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle. Nature 439(7078): 843–846.

21.

EFRA (2013) Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Select Committee Second Report, Vaccination against bovine TB: Volume I House of Commons Session 2013-014, HC 258, The Stationery Office, London.

22.

Enticott

(2001) Calculating nature: The case of badgers, bovine tuberculosis and cattle. Journal of Rural Studies 17: 149–164.

23.

Enticott

(2014) Relational distance, neoliberalism and the regulation of animal health. Geoforum 52: 42–50.

24.

Enticott

(2015) Public attitudes to badger culling to control bovine tuberculosis in rural Wales. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 387–398.

25.

Enticott

Vanclay

(2011) Scripts, animal health and biosecurity: The moral accountability of farmers’ talk about animal health risks. Health, Risk & Society 13: 293–309.

26.

Enticott

Maye

Fisher

et al. (2014) Badger vaccination: Dimensions of trust and confidence in the governance of animal disease. Environment and Planning A 46: 2881–2897.

27.

Fischer

(2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

28.

Fisher

(2013) ‘A gentleman’s handshake’: The role of social capital and trust in transforming information into usable knowledge. Journal of Rural Studies 31: 13–22.

29.

Grant

(2009) Intractable policy failure: The case of bovine TB and badgers. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 11: 557–573.

30.

Haas

(2004) When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 11: 569–592.

31.

Hansard (2008) Bovine TB. Daily Hansard – Debate, 7 July, part 0004. Available at: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080707/debtext/80707-0004.htm (accessed 03 April 2017).

32.

Hansard (2014) Badger Cull. Commons Chamber Debate, 13 March, Volume 577. Available at: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2014-03-13/debates/14031380000001/BadgerCull (accessed 03 April 2017).

33.

Hulme

(2009) Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Irvin

Stansbury

(2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review 64: 55.

35.

Irwin

(1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development, Hove: Psychology Press.

36.

ISG (2007) Bovine TB: The Scientific Evidence. A Science Base for a Sustainable Policy to Control TB in Cattle. An Epidemiological Investigation into Bovine Tuberculosis. Final Report of the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB. Presented to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs The Rt Hon David Miliband MP, June 2007. Available at: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/atoz/tb/isg/report/final_report.pdf (accessed 26 February 2015).

37.

King D (2007) Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle And Badgers: A Report by the Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir David King. Presented to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs The Rt Hon David Miliband MP, July 2007. Available at: www.bovinetb.info/docs/RBCT_david_%20king_report.pdf (accessed 22 June 2015).

38.

Lane

Odoni

Landström

et al. (2011) Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36: 15–36.

39.

Latour

(2002) War of the Worlds: What about Peace? Translated by Bigg C and Tresch J (eds), Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

40.

Lodge

Matus

(2014) Science, badgers, politics: Advocacy coalitions and policy change in bovine tuberculosis policy in Britain. Policy Studies Journal 42: 367–390.

41.

Luks

(1999) Post-normal science and the rhetoric of inquiry: Deconstructing normal science? Futures 31: 705–719.

42.

McKeown

Thomas

(1988) Q Methodology: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, London: Sage.

43.

Maye

Enticott

Ilbery

et al. (2013) Assessing farmer confidence in badger vaccination: Some findings from a survey of cattle farmers in England. Journal of Rural and Community Development 8: 49–64.

44.

Maye

Enticott

Naylor

et al. (2014) Animal disease and narratives of nature: Farmers’ reactions to the neoliberal governance of bovine tuberculosis. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 401–410.

45.

National Farmers’ Union (2013) High Court injunction in full. Available at: www.nfuonline.com/business/legal/high-court-injunction-in-full/ (accessed 26 February 2015).

46.

National Trust (2017) Our View on Badgers and Bovine TB. National Trust website. Available at: www.nationaltrust.org.uk/features/our-view-on-badgers-and-bovine-tb (accessed 11 January 2017).

47.

Naylor

Courtney

(2014) Exploring the social context of risk perception and behaviour: Farmers’ response to bovine tuberculosis. Geoforum 57: 48–56.

48.

Naylor

Maye

Ilbery

et al. (2014) Researching controversial and sensitive issues: Using visual vignettes to explore farmers’ attitudes towards the control of bovine tuberculosis in England. Area 46: 285–293.

49.

Owens

(2000) ‘Engaging the Public’: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning A 32: 1141–1148.

50.

Price

(2017) Thinking Through Badgers: Researching the Controversy over Bovine Tuberculosis and the Culling of Badgers, Delaware: Vernon Press.

51.

Saltelli

Giampietro

(2015) The fallacy of evidence based policy. In: Benessia

Funtowicz

Giampietro

et al. (eds) Science on the Verge, Tempe, AZ and Washington, DC: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.

52.

SAVE ME (2012) The Randomised Badger Culling Trial. Available at: www.save-me.org.uk/BAD_RBCT_SM.html (accessed 22 June 2015).

53.

Schmolk P (2014) PQMethod 2.35 with PQROT 2.0. Available at: http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/downpqwin.htm (accessed 26 February 2015).

54.

Shemmings

(2006) ‘Quantifying’ qualitative data: An illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 147–165.

55.

Shinebourne

Adams

(2007) Q-methodology as a phenomenological research method. Existential Analysis 18: 103–116.

56.

Stengers

(2005) Introductory notes on an ecology of practice. Cultural Studies Review 11: 183–196.

57.

Stephenson

(1953) The Study of Behaviour: Q Technique and its Methodology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

58.

Team Badger (2013) Backing Badgers: Why the cull will fail. Available at: www.teambadger.org.uk/imagesout/PDF/Team%20Badger%20report_LowRes.pdf (accessed 22 June 2015).

59.

TB Free England (2013) Bovine TB in numbers: 16%. Available at: www.tbfreeengland.co.uk/latest-news/bovine-tb-in-numbers-16/ (accessed 22 June 2015).

60.

The Independent (2011) Badger cull would be a mistake, says scientist and key no. 10 adviser, 12 July, p. 8.

61.

The Observer (2012) Culling badgers could increase the problem of TB in cattle, 14 October. Available at: www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2012/oct/14/letters-observer (accessed 19 February 2016).

62.

The Telegraph (2013) Farmers win injunction against badger cull activists, 22 August. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/10260604/Farmers-win-injunction-against-badger-cull-activists.html (accessed 05 October 2015).

63.

van Buuren

(2009) Knowledge for governance, governance of knowledge: Inclusive knowledge management in collaborative governance processes. International Public Management Journal 12: 208–235.

64.

Venables

Pidgeon

Simmons

et al. (2009) Living with nuclear power: A Q-Method study of local community perceptions. Risk Analysis 29: 1089–1104.

65.

Watts

Stenner

(2012) Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation, London: Sage.

66.

Zoological Society of London (2013) Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle and Badgers – ZSL Statement. Available at: www.zsl.org/science/news/bovine-tuberculosis-in-cattle-and-badgers-zsl-statement (accessed 22 June 2015).