Studies of urban disaster and climate change risk have increasingly invoked governmentality as a theoretical frame for understanding how urban risk governance functions. This article argues that the use of governmentality in this context can advance political readings of urban vulnerability to climate risk. However, using the idiom of co-production from Science and Technology Studies, I question current treatments of the politics of expertise in the urban risk governance literature, highlighting the need to understand the political commitments and practices that shape the implementation of purportedly technical risk knowledge and their particular manifestation in the context of informal, urban settlements. A case study from Bogota, Colombia, links the science and practice of state risk management to vulnerability outcomes in informal urban settlements. It shows how a new suite of qualitative methodological approaches are revealing of the power-knowledge dynamics in governance that influence vulnerability, and their differential social effects.
AdgerN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change16: 268–281.
2.
BankoffGHilhorstD (2009) The politics of risk in the Philippines: Comparing state and NGO perceptions of disaster management. Disasters33(4): 686–704.
3.
BiehlJ (2005) Technologies of invisibility: Politics of life and social inequality. In: IndaJX (ed.) Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality and Life Politics, Malden: Blackwell.
4.
BirkmannJGarschagenMKraasFet al.(2010) Adaptive urban governance: New challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science5(2): 185–206. DOI:10.1007/s11625-010-0111-3.
5.
BirkmannJVon TeichmanK (2010) Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: Key challenges—Scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustainability Science5(2): 171–184.
6.
BlaikiePMCannonTDavisIet al.(1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters, London; New York: Routledge.
7.
BoydEEnsorJCastan-BrotoVet al.(2014) Environmentalities of urban climate governance in Maputo, Mozambique. Global Environmental Change26: 140–151.
8.
BulkeleyH (2015) Accomplishing Climate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BulkeleyHTutsR (2013) Understanding urban vulnerability, adaptation and resilience in the context of climate change. Local Environment18(6): 646–662.
10.
CorbridgeSWilliamsGSrivastavaMet al.(2005) Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CutterSBarnesLBerryMet al.(2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change4(18): 598–606.
12.
Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20(4): 529–539.
13.
Decreto 40 (2011) Por El Cual Se Modifica ParcialmenteEl Decreto 094 de 2003, Alcalde Mayor de Bogota D.C.
14.
Decreto 94 (2003) Por El Cual Se Adopta Y Reglamenta El ValorUnico de Reconocimiento (VUR), Alcalde Mayor de Bogota D.C.
15.
De HaanLZoomersA (2005) Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research. Development and Change36(1): 27–47.
16.
DicksonETiwariABakerJet al.(2010) Understanding Urban Risk: An Approach for Assessing Disaster & Climate Risk in Cities, Washington: World Bank Urban Development & Local Government Unit.
DPAE (2009) Recuperación integral de zonas de alto riesgo no mitigable y mitigable del sector Altos de Estancia: Informe detallado del proyecto, Bogota: DPAE.
20.
DuminyJ (2011) Literature Survey: Informality and Planning. Review for Women in Informal Employment Globalising and Organising (WIEGO), Cape Town, South Africa: African Centre for Cities.
21.
EpsteinS (2009) Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FergusonJ (1994) The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho, Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
23.
ForsythT (2003) Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, London: Routledge.
24.
GuptaA (2012) Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
25.
HendriksB (2011) Urban livelihoods and institutions: Towards matching institutions for the poor in Nairobi’s informal settlements. International Development Planning Review33(2): 111–146.
26.
HewittK (1983) Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology, London: Allen & Unwin.
27.
JasanoffS (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, Oxford and New York: Routledge.
28.
JasanoffSWynneB (1998) Science and decisionmaking. In: RaynerSMaloneE (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change: The Societal FrameworkVol. 1, Ohio: Battelle Press.
29.
Jenkins P and Anderson J (2011) Developing cities in between the formal and informal. In: 4th European conference on African studies: African engagements – On whose terms?.
30.
LampisARubianoL (2012) Y Siguen Culpando a La Lluvia! Vulnerabilidad Ambiental Y Social En El Sector Altos de La Estancia, Bogotá (Colombia). In: BrianesF (ed.) Perspectivas de Investigación Y Acción Frente Al Cambio Climático En Latinoamérica, Panama: LA RED.
31.
LaneSLandströmCWhatmoreSJ (2011) Imagining flood futures: Risk assessment and risk management in practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A369: 1784–1806.
32.
LeachMMearnsRScoonesI (1997) Environmental Entitlements: A Framework for Understanding the Institutional Dynamics of Environmental Change. IDS Discussion Paper 359. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
33.
LewisD (2008) Using life histories in social policy research: The case of third sector/public sector boundary crossing. Journal of Social Policy37(4): 559–578.
34.
LiT (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
35.
LopezDH (2007) Landslide risk assessment tools for making decisions quickly in critical situations. In: Joint CIG/ISPRS conference on geomatics. Toronto, Canada, May 2007.
36.
MoserCNortonASteinAet al.(2010) Pro-Poor Adaptation to Climate Change in Urban Centres: Case Studies of Vulnerability and Resilience in Kenya and Nicaragua. Social Development Department Report 54947-GLB. Washington: World Bank.
37.
MustafaD (2005) The production of an urban hazardscape in Pakistan: Modernity, vulnerability and the range of choice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers95(3): 566–586.
38.
PellingM (2003) The Vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience, 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
39.
RebotierJ (2012) Vulnerability conditions and risk representations in Latin America: Framing the territorializing urban risk. Global Environmental Change22(2): 391–398.
40.
Robles JoyaS (2008) Impactos Del Reasentamiento Por Vulnerabilidad En Áreas de Alto Riesgo. Bogotá, 1991–2005. sis de grado por el título de Magíster en Hábitat, Bogota: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
41.
RothsteinHDownerJ (2012) ‘Renewing DEFRA’: Exploring the emergence of risk-based policy-making in UK central government. Public Administration90(3): 781–799.
42.
RoyA (2009) Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory8(1): 76–87.
43.
SatterthwaiteD (2011) How can urban centers adapt to climate change with ineffective or unrepresentative local governments?WIREs Climate Change2: 767–776.
44.
StrippleJBulkeleyH (2014) Governing the Climate: New Approaches to Rationality, Power and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
VarleyA (2013) Postcolonialising informality?Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31: 4–22.
46.
WamslerCBrinkE (2013) Planning for climate change in urban areas: From theory to practice. Journal of Cleaner Production50: 68–81.
47.
World Bank (2011) Climate Change, Disaster Risk and the Urban Poor: Cities Building Resilience for a Changing World, Washington: The World Bank.
48.
WynneB (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: LashSSzerszynskiBWynneB (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, London: Thousand Oaks; Sage: New Delhi.
49.
ZeidermanA (2012) On shaky ground: The making of risk in Bogota. Environment and Planning A44(7): 1570–1588.
