Unregulated contact between young people in care and their birth parents or extended family is often regarded as a risk-laden area of social work. This article discusses the concept of contact and reviews some current perceptions of mobile technologies and social media. It considers why unregulated contact is pursued by young people in care and highlights the significance of theoretical ideas on adolescent brain development and insecure attachment. The article argues for the adoption of a different mindset by social work practitioners in terms of understanding mobile technologies and social media, and of how the risks associated with it should be assessed. A set of solutions is posited to help practitioners deal with this ever-challenging phenomenon.
BatmanghelidjhC (2009) Terrorised and terrorising teenager: the search for hope in teenagers and attachment. In: PerryA (eds) Teenagers and Attachment: Helping adolescents engage with life and learning, London: Worth Publishing, pp. 175–193.
5.
BeerDBurrowsR (2007) Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: some initial considerations. Sociological Research online12(5): 1–19.
6.
BessantJ (2008) Hard wired for risk: neurological science, ‘the adolescent brain’ and developmental theory. Journal of Youth Studies11(3): 347–360.
7.
BiehalN (2007) Reuniting children with their families: reconsidering the evidence on timing, contact and outcomes. British Journal of Social Work37: 807–823.
8.
BomberLM (2009) Survival of the fittest in teenagers and attachment. In: PerryA (eds) Teenagers and Attachment: Helping adolescents engage with life and learning, London: Worth Publishing, pp. 31–62.
9.
BowlbyJ (1969) Attachment and loss. Volume 1: Attachment, New York: Basic Books.
Boyd D and Marwick A (2011) Social privacy in networked publics: teen attitudes, practices and strategies. Paper presented at A Decade of Internet Time: Symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society, Oxford Internet Institute, 22 September.
12.
Carrick-Davies S (2012) Introduction and welcome to Munch Poke Ping Conference, 19 November.
13.
Children’s Rights Director for England (2009) Keeping in Touch: A report on children’s experiences, London: Ofsted.
DahlRE (2004) Adolescent brain development: a period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. New York Academy of Science102: 1–22.
16.
DelfrabbroPHBarberJGCooperL (2002) The role of parental contact in substitute care. Journal of Social Service Research28(3): 19–39.
17.
Fostering Network (2011) The Heart of the Matter: Supporting family contact for fostered children – Handbook on contact, London: Fostering Network.
18.
FurslandE (2010a) Social Networking and Contact: How social workers can help adoptive families, London: BAAF.
19.
FurslandE (2010b) Facing up to Facebook: A survival guide for adoptive families, London: BAAF.
20.
FurslandE (2011a) Foster care and Social Networking: A guide for social workers and foster carers, London: BAAF.
21.
FurslandE (2011b) Social Networking and You, London: BAAF.
22.
GalvanAHareTVossHGloverGCaseyBJ (2007) Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: Who is at risk?Developmental Science10(2): 8–14.
23.
GeddesH (2006) Attachment in the Classroom, London: Worth Publishing.
24.
HoweD (2009) The impact of histories of abuse and neglect on children in placement. In: SchofieldGSimmondsJ (eds) The Child Placement Handbook: Research, policy and practice, London: BAAF, pp. 47–61.
25.
KelmshallH (2007) Risk assessment and management: an overview. In: LishmanJ (eds) Handbook for Practice Learning in Social Work and Social Care, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 153–168.
26.
McWeyLMMullisAK (2004) Improving the lives of children in foster care: the impact of supervised visitation. Family Relations53: 293–300.
27.
PartridgeBC (2010) Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles and pediatric decision-making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy35: 518–525.
28.
QuintonDRushtonADanceCMayesD (1997) Contact between children placed away from home and their birth parents: research issues and evidence. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry2(3): 393–413.
29.
ReynaVFFarleyF (2006) Risk and rationality in adolescent decision-making. Psychological Science in the Public Interest7(1): 1–44.
30.
RomerDDuckworthALSznitmanSParkS (2010) Can adolescents learn self-control? Delay of gratification in the development of control over risk-taking. Prev Sci11: 330–391.
31.
SchofieldGWardEYoungJ (2009) Parenting while Apart: Experiences of parents of children growing up in foster care, Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
32.
SpearLP (2000) Adolescent brain and age-related behavioural manifestations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews24: 417–463.
33.
SteinbergL (2007) Risk-taking in adolescence: new perspectives from brain and behavioural science. Current Directions in Psychological Science16(2): 55–59.
SunderlandM (2006) The Science of Parenting: Practical guidance on sleep, crying, play and building emotional wellbeing for life, New York: DK Publishing.
36.
ThomasN (2005) Social Work with Young People in Care: Looking after children in theory and practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
TittertonM (1999) Training professionals in risk assessment and risk management: What does research tell us? In: ParsloeP (eds) Risk Assessment in Social Care and Social Work, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 217–247.
38.
TriseliotisJ (2010) Contact between looked after children and their parents: a level playing field?Adoption & Fostering34(3): 59–65.
39.
WilsonKSinclairITaylorCPithouseASellickC (2004) Fostering Success: An exploration of the research literature in foster care, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
