The concept of the extinction debt has two components: a direct timelag between an environmental perturbation and the consequent extinction of a species and the idea that among species going extinct the strong competitors/weak colonizers go extinct first. Although the term was first used in 1994 in the context of metapopulation models, its roots go back to general systems theory and the theory of island biogeography. It has been qualified and elaborated since 1994, mostly in terms of the effects of spatial pattern on the outcomes. The strongest critiques of the concept emphasize that the direct trade-off between competition and colonization abilities is not simple. The original application was to remnant habitat patches, but it could be applied to spatially heterogeneous habitats that are subject to climate change or invasive species. As a guide to conservation practice, extinction debt remains a general cautionary principle rather than a specific prescription, but the raising of awareness is nevertheless significant.
Banks, J.E.1997: Do imperfect trade-offs affect the extinction debt phenomenon ? Ecology78, 1597-601.
2.
Brooks, T.M., Pimm, S.L. and Oyugi, J.O.1999: Time lag between deforestation and bird extinction in tropical forest fragments. Conservation Biology13, 1140-50.
3.
Brown, J.H.1971: Mammals on mountaintops: nonequilibrium insular biogeography . American Naturalist105, 467-78.
4.
Brown, J.H. and Lomolino, M.V.1989: Independent discovery of the equilibrium theory of island biogeography. Ecology70, 1954-57.
5.
Bulman, C.R., Wilson, R.J., Holt, A.R., Gálvez Bravo,L.,Early,R.I.,Warren,M.S.andThomas, C.D.2007: Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. Ecological Applications17, 1460-73.
6.
Chorley, R.J. and Kennedy, B.A.1971: Systems analysis in physical geography. London: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Cowlishaw, G.1999: Predicting the pattern of decline of African primate diversity: an extinction debt from historical deforestation. Conservation Biology13, 1183-93.
8.
Curtis, J.T.1956: The modification of mid-latitude grasslands and forests by man. In Thomas, W.L., editor, Man's role in changing the face of the Earth, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 721-36.
9.
Darwin, C.E.1859: On the origin of species by means of natural selection . London: John Murray.
10.
Davis, M.B.1989: Lags in vegetation response to greenhouse warming. Climatic Change15, 75-82.
11.
Diamond, J.M.1972: Biogeographic kinetics: estimation of relaxation times for avifaunas of southwest Pacific islands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 69, 3199-203.
12.
Diamond, J.M., Terborgh, J., Whitcomb, R.F., Lynch, J.F., Opler, P.A., Robbins, C.S., Simberloff, D.S. and Abele, L.G.1976: Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations . Science193, 1027-32.
13.
Dytham, C.1994: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence: a cellular model. Journal of Animal Ecology63, 490-91.
14.
- 1995a: Competitive coexistence and empty patches in spatially explicit metapopulation models. Journal of Animal Ecology64, 145-46.
15.
- 1995b: The effect of habitat destruction pattern on species persistence: a cellular model. Oikos74, 340-44.
16.
Ellis, C.J. and Coppins, B.J.2007: Changing climate and historic-woodland structure interact to control species diversity of the `Lobarion' epiphyte community in Scotland . Journal of Vegetation Science18, 725-34.
17.
Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M.1986: Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.
18.
Golinski, M. and Boecklen, W.J.2006: A model-independent test for the presence of regulatory equilibrium and non-random structure in island species trajectories. Journal of Biogeography33, 1566-70.
19.
Gonzalez, A.2000: Community relaxation in fragmented landscapes: the relation between species richness, area and age. Ecology Letters3, 441-48.
20.
Green, R.E., Cornell, S.J., Scharlemann, J.P.W. and Balmford, A.2005: Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science307, 550-55.
21.
Gutierrez, D., Leon-Cortes, J.L., Menendez, R., Wilson, R.J., Cowley, M.J.R. and Thomas, C.D.2001: Metapopulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus corniculatus. Ecology82, 1371-86.
22.
Hanski, I.1994: A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology63, 151-62.
23.
- 2000: Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modeling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation . Annales Zoologica Fennici37, 271-80.
24.
Hanski, I. and Ovaskainen, O.2000: The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape . Nature404, 755-58.
25.
- 2002: Extinction debt at extinction threshold. Conservation Biology16, 666-73.
26.
Hanski, I. and Simberloff, D.1997: The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M.E., editors, Metapopulation biology, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 5-26.
27.
Hastings, A. and Higgins, K.1994: Persistence of transients in spatially structured ecological models. Science263, 1133-36.
28.
Helm, A., Hanski, I. and Partel, M.2006: Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters9, 72-77.
29.
Higgins, S.I. and Cain, M.L.2002: Spatially realistic plant metapopulation models and the colonization-competition trade-off. Journal of Ecology90, 616-26.
30.
Jackson, S.T. and Overpeck, J.T.2000: Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the Late Quaternary. Paleobiology26, 194-220.
31.
Jakobsson, A. and Eriksson, O.2003: Trade-offs between dispersal and competitive ability: a comparative study of wind-dispersed Asteraceae forbs. Evolutionary Ecology17, 233-46.
32.
Johnson, M.P.2000: Temporally explicit habitat ecology and the coexistence of species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B267, 1967-72.
33.
Keddy, P.A.1989: Competition. New York: Chapman and Hall.
34.
Klausmeier, C.A.1998: Extinction in multispecies and spatially explicit models of habitat destruction. American Naturalist152, 303-10.
35.
Korner, K. and Jeltsch, F.2008: Detecting general plant functional type responses in fragmented landscapes using spatially-explicit simulations. Ecological Modelling210, 287-300.
36.
Laube, S. and Zotz, G.2007: A metapopulation approach to the analysis of long-term changes in the epiphyte vegetation on the host tree Annona glabra. Journal of Vegetation Science18, 613-24.
37.
Laurance, W.F.2002: Hyperdynamism in fragmented habitats. Journal of Vegetation Science13, 595-602.
38.
Lehman, C.L. and Tilman, D.1997: Competition in spatial habitats. In Tilman, D. and Kareiva, P., editors, Spatial ecology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 185-203.
39.
Levins, R.1969: Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomology Society of America15, 237-40.
40.
Lindenmayer, D.B., McCarthy, M.A. and Pope, M.L.1999: Arboreal marsupial incidence in eucalypt patches in south-eastern Australia: a test of Hanski's incidence function metapopulation model for patch occupancy. Oikos84, 99-109.
41.
Loehle, C. and Li, B-L.1996: Habitat destruction and the extinction debt revisited . Ecological Applications6, 784-89.
42.
Lomolino, M.V. and Davis, R.1997: Biogeographic scale and biodiversity of mountain forest mammals of western North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters6, 57-76.
43.
Lomolino, M.V., Brown, J.H. and Davis, R.1989: Island biogeography of montane forest mammals in the American Southwest. Ecology70, 180-94. MacArthur, R.H.1972: Geographical ecology.
44.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O.1967: The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Malanson, G.P.2002a: Extinction debt trajectories and spatial pattern of habitat destruction. Annals of the Association of American Geographers92, 177-88.
47.
- 2002b: Effects of spatial representation of habitat in competition-colonization models. Geographical Analysis34, 141-54.
48.
Malanson, G.P., Wang, Q. and Kupfer, J.A.2007: Ecological processes and spatial patterns before, during and after simulated deforestation. Ecological Modelling202, 397-409.
49.
Malanson, G.P., Westman, W.E. and Yan, Y.-L.1992: Realized versus fundamental niche functions in a model of chaparral response to climatic change. Ecological Modelling64, 261-77.
50.
Marshall, L.G., Webb, S.D., Sepkoski, J.J. and Raup, D.M.1982: Mammalian evolution and the Great American Interchange . Science215, 1351-57.
51.
May, R.M.1975: Island biogeography and design of wildlife preserves. Nature254, 177-78.
52.
- 1994: Ecological science and the management of protected areas . Biodiversity and Conservation3, 437-48.
53.
McCarthy, M.A., Lindenmayer, D.B. and Dreschler, M.1997: Extinction debts and risks faced by abundant species. Conservation Biology11, 221-26.
54.
McDonald, K.A. and Brown, J.H.1992: Using montane mammals to model extinctions due to global change. Conservation Biology6, 409-15.
55.
Meyer, W.B. and Turner, B.L.1992: Human population growth and global land-use/cover change . Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics23, 39-61.
56.
Mikkelson, G.M.1993: How do food webs fall apart? A study of changes in trophic structure during relaxation on habitat fragments. Oikos67, 539-47.
57.
Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I.1995: Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology64, 141-44.
58.
Morozov, A. and Li, B.L.2008: Abundance patterns in multi-species communities exposed to habitat destruction. Journal of Theoretical Biology251, 593-605.
59.
Munroe, E.G.1948: The geographical distribution of butterflies in the West Indies. PhD thesis, Cornell University.
60.
Nee, S. and May, R.M.1992: Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology61, 37-40.
61.
Neuhauser, C.1998: Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence in spatially explicit models with local interactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology193, 445-63.
62.
Ovaskainen, O.2002: Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem . Journal of Theoretical Biology218, 419-433.
63.
Ovaskainen, O. and Hanski, I.2001: Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Theoretical Population Biology60, 281-302.
64.
Ovaskainen, O., Sato, K., Bascompte, J. and Hanski, I.2002: Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology215, 95-108.
65.
Pacala, S.W. and Rees, M.1998: Models suggesting field experiments to test two hypotheses explaining successional diversity. American Naturalist152, 729-37.
66.
Patterson, B.D.1990: On the temporal development of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oikos59, 330-42.
67.
Pearman, P.B.2002: The scale of community structure: habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understory. Ecological Monographs72, 19-39.
68.
Rosenzweig, M.L.1995: Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
Simpson, B.B.1974: Glacial migrations of plants: island biogeographical evidence . Science185, 698-700.
70.
Stohlgren, T.J., Barnett, D.T., Jarnevich, C.S., Flather, C. and Kartesz, J.2008: The myth of plant species saturation. Ecology Letters11, 313-26.
71.
Terborgh, J.1975: Faunal equilibria and the design of wildlife preserves . In Golley, F.B. and Medina, E., editors, Tropical ecological systems , New York: Springer, 369-80.
72.
Terborgh, J., Feeley, K., Silman, M., Nunez, P. and Balukjian, B.2006: Vegetation dynamics of predator-free land bridges. Journal of Ecology94, 253-63.
73.
Terborgh, J., Lopez, L., Nunez, P., Rao, M., Shahabuddin, G., Orihuela, G., Riveros, M., Ascanio, R., Adler, G.H., Lambert, T.D. and Balbas, L.2001: Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments . Science294, 1923-26.
74.
Tilman, D. and Lehman, C.L.1997: Habitat destruction and extinction. In Tilman, D. and Kareiva, P., editors. Spatial ecology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 233-49.
75.
Tilman, D., Lehman, C.L. and Yin, C.1997: Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. American Naturalist149, 407-35.
76.
Tilman, D., May, R.M., Lehman, C.L. and Nowak, M.A.1994: Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature371, 65-66.
77.
Vellend, M., Verheyen, K., Jacquemyn, H., Kolb, A., van Calster, H., Peterken, G. and Hermy, M.2006: Extinction debt of forest plants persist for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology87, 542-48.
78.
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J.M.1997: Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science277, 494-99.
79.
Wang, Q. and Malanson, G.P.2008: Spatial hyperdynamism in a post-disturbance simulated forest. Ecological Modelling215, 337-44.
80.
Wennergren, U., Ruckelshaus, M. and Kareiva, P.1995: The promise and limitations of spatial models in conservation biology. Oikos74, 349-56.
81.
Wiersma, Y.F. and Nudds, T.D.2001: Comparison of methods to estimate historic species richness of mammals for tests of faunal relaxation in Canadian parks. Journal of Biogeography28, 447-52.
82.
Willis, E.O.1974: Populations and local extinctions of birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monographs44, 153-69.
83.
Yu, D.W. and Wilson, H.B.2001: The competition-colonization tradeoff is dead; long live the com-petition-colonization tradeoff. American Naturalist158, 49-63.
