The creep properties derived from stress relaxation tests are compared to those from creep tests in the temperature range from 705 °C to 800 °C and stresses from 200 MPa to 750 MPa for the nickel base superalloys IN738LC and modified Waspaloy. The creep behaviour of IN738LC exhibits an extended period of steady state strain rate, while creep of modified Waspaloy exhibits only a minimum creep strain rate. The results indicate that stress relaxation tests can be used to estimate the creep steady state or minimum strain rates, time to 1 per cent creep strain, and the creep stress exponent for both superalloys. Stress relaxation tests can generate these properties in a significantly more time-efficient and specimen-efficient manner than creep tests, regardless of whether the superalloy creep behaviour exhibits a steady state or minimum creep strain rate.
EvansR. W.WilshireB.Introduction to creep, 1993 (The Institute of Materials, London, UK).
2.
PoirierJ.-P.Creep of crystals: High-temperature deformation processes in metals, ceramics and minerals, 1985 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
3.
SajjadiS. A.NateghS.A high temperature deformation mechanism map for the high performance Ni-base superalloy GTD-111. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2001, A307, 158–164.
4.
BoseS. C.SinghK.SwaminathanJ.SarmaD. S.Prediction of creep life of X10CrMoVNbN-91 (P-91) steel through short term stress relaxation test methodology. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2004, 20, 1290–1296.
5.
LemaitreJ.ChabocheJ. -L.Mechanics of solid materials, 1990 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK)
6.
WeertmanJ.WeertmanJ. R.Mechanical properties, strongly temperature dependent. In Physical metallurgy (Ed. CahnR. W.), 1970, chapter 16, pp. 985–1010 (North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam).
7.
SoderbergC. R.The intrepretation of creep tests for machine design. Trans. ASME, 1936, 58, 733–743.
8.
OdingI. A.IvanovaV. S.BurdukskiiV. V.GeminovV. N.Creep and stress relaxation in metals, 1959 (Oliver and Boyd, London).
9.
DaleoJ. A.EllisonK. A.WoodfordD. A.Application of stress relaxation testing in metallurgical life assessment evaluation of GTD111 alloy turbine buckets. Trans. ASME J. Engng. Gas Turbines Power, 1999, 121, 129–137.
10.
ZhanZ.TongJ.Determination of creep curves from multiple hardening-relaxation testing. J. Strain Analysis, 2003, 38, 277–280. DOI: 10.1243/030932403765310608.
11.
BoseS. C.SinghK.JayaramanG.Application of stress relaxation test methodology for predicting creep life of a large steam turbine rotor steel (1CrMoV). J. Test. Evaluation, 2003, 31, 1–13.
12.
WoodfordD. A.Creep analysis of directionally solidified GTD111 based on stress relaxation testing. Mater. High Temps, 1997, 14, 413–420.
13.
BeddoesJ.MohammadiT.Comparison of stress relaxation and creep strain rates for the superalloy IN738LC. J. Strain Analysis, 2010, 45, 587–592.
14.
AltenbachH.NaumenkoK.GorashY.Creep analysis for a wide stress range based on stress relaxation experiments. Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 2008, 22, 5413–5418.
KearseyR. M.KoulA. K.BeddoesJ.CooperC.Development and characterization of a damage tolerant microstructure for a Ni-base turbine disc alloy. In Superalloys 2000, (eds GreenK APollockT MKissingerR D) 2000, pp. 117–126 (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania).
17.
WisniewskiA.BeddoesJ.Influence of grain boundary morphology on creep of a wrought Ni-base superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2009, A510–511, 266–272.
BeddoesJ.PagliarelloA.The stress relaxation and creep behaviour of a manganese-stabilized austenitic stainless steel. J. Strain Analysis, 2009, 44, 201–209.
21.
RamanA.IbekweS.GabbT.Impulse excitation study of elasticity of different precipitated microstructures in IN738LC at high temperatures. J. Mater. Engng Performance, 2005, 14, 188–193. DOI: 10.1361/10599490523337.
22.
BeddoesJ.WallaceW.Heat treatment of hot isostatically processed IN-738 investment castings. Metallography, 1980, 13, 185–194.
23.
WoodfordD. A.Advances in the use stress relaxation data for design and life assessment in combustion turbines. JSME Intl J., 2002, 45, 98–103.
24.
NaumenkoK.AltenbachH.GorashY.Creep analysis with a stress range dependent constitutive model. Arch. Appl. Mech., 2009, 79, 619–630.
25.
AltenbachH.NaumenkoK.Creep analysis for a wide stress range based on stress relaxation experiments. Int. J. Modern Phys. B, 2008, 22, 5413–5418.
26.
NaumenkoK.KostenkoY.Structural analysis of a power plant component using a stress-range-dependent creep-damage constitutive model. Mat. Sci. Eng., 2009, A510–511, 169–174.
