A strain-based approach to study interaction between non-coplanar through-thickness edge notches

Abstract

Structural integrity assessment procedures to assess the effect of interaction between multiple adjacent flaws normally consist of two stages. First, alignment rules categorize non-coplanar flaws as aligned or non-aligned. Second, combination rules classify aligned flaws as interacting or non-interacting. Although these criteria are applied to different failure modes like brittle fracture, elastic–plastic fracture and plastic collapse, most of them were developed based on linear elastic fracture mechanics for the sake of simplicity. However, there are very limited references available for the technical background of these criteria. This lack of justifying backgrounds becomes more critical when applying these procedures to any other failure modes other than brittle fracture. This article studies the interaction between non-coplanar edge notches in scenarios of large deformation. Hereto, strain patterns are studied through full-field deformation measurements utilizing both experimental and numerical tools. Digital image correlation is used to measure strain during experiments and to verify the finite element analyses. The results show that in addition to the crack driving force, which represents a local response of notches, the global strain distribution within the specimen in terms of strain patterns can be used to probe the interaction between non-coplanar flaws. The authors suggest a novel criterion based on the trajectory of maximum equivalent strain to distinguish between aligned and non-aligned flaws. This study is based on double-edge notched tension specimens and gives a fundamental insight into flaw interaction in failure modes other than brittle fracture.

Keywords

Flaw interaction crack tip opening displacement digital image correlation strain concentration band engineering critical assessment multiple defects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

De Waele

Hasegawa

Denys

Flaw interaction rules in FITNET FFS procedure. In: Mustafa

(ed) International conference on fitness-for-service. Amsterdam: GKSS Research Centre and SHELL Global Solutions, 2006, pp.1–6.

Rules for inservice inspection of nuclear power plant components: ASME boiler and pressure vessel code XI. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015.

BS7910:2013+A1:2015. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. London: British Standards Institute, 2015.

API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. Recommended practice for fitness-for-service. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute, 2007.

Moussa

Bell

Tan

CL.

The interaction of two parallel non-coplanar identical surface cracks under tension and bending. Int J Press Vessel Pip 1999; 76: 135–145.

Wang

Weight functions and strip yield solution for two equal-length collinear cracks in an infinite sheet. Eng Fract Mech 2011; 78: 2356–2368.

Kamaya

Totsuka

Influence of interaction between multiple cracks on stress corrosion crack propagation. Corros Sci 2002; 44: 2333–2352.

Stonesifer

Brust

Leis

BN.

Mixed-mode stress intensity factors for interacting semi-elliptical surface cracks in a plate. Eng Fract Mech 1993; 45: 357–380.

Hasegawa

Saito

Miyazaki

Alignment rule for non-aligned flaws for fitness-for-service evaluations based on LEFM. J Press Vessel Technol 2009; 131: 41403.

10.

Hasegawa

Miyazaki

Saito

Behavior of plastic collapse moments for pipes with two non-aligned flaws. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 pressure vessels and piping division (PVP2010), Bellevue, WA, 18–22 July 2010, pp.1–7. New York: ASME.

11.

Kamaya

A flaw proximity rule for interacting surface cracks based on elastic-plastic fracture analysis. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 pressure vessels and piping division conference (PVP2009), Prague, Czech Republic, 26–30 July 2009, pp.1–8. New York: ASME.

12.

Kamaya

A plastic collapse assessment procedure for multiple cracks under internal pressure. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 pressure vessels and piping division conference (PVP2011), Baltimore, MD, 17–21 July 2011, pp.1–7. New York: ASME.

13.

Iwamatsu

Miyazaki

Takazawa

et al . Evaluation procedure of limit load for non-aligned multiple flaws. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 pressure vessels and piping conference (PVP2013), Paris, France, 14–18 July 2013, pp.1–6. New York: ASME.

14.

Miyazaki

Effect of flaw dimensions on ductile fracture behavior of non-aligned multiple flaws in a plate. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 pressure vessels & piping division conference (PVP2011), Baltimore, MD, 17–21 July 2011. New York: ASME.

15.

De Waele

The interaction of weld defects under plastic collapse. Mater Sci Forum 2005; 475–479: 2735–2738.

16.

Denys

Andrews

Zarea

et al . The EPRG guidelines on the assessment of defects in transmission pipeline girth welds. J Pipeline Eng Vol 2015; 14: 620–624.

17.

Chang

On crack-crack interaction and coalescence in fatigue. Eng Fract Mech 1982; 16: 683–693.

18.

Chang

Kotousov

A fatigue crack growth model for interacting cracks in a plate of arbitrary thickness. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2014; 37: 1254–1267.

19.

Kotousov

Chang

Theoretical and experimental study of fatigue growth of interacting cracks. Int J Fatigue 2015; 70: 130–136.

20.

Iida

Kawahara

Propagation and coalescence of fatigue cracks initiated from collinear or parallel adjacent surface flaws. Press Vessel Technol 1980; 1: 257–263.

21.

Kamaya

Miyokawa

Kikuchi

Growth prediction of two interacting surface cracks of dissimilar sizes. Eng Fract Mech 2010; 77: 3120–3131.

22.

De Waele

Denys Rudi Lefevre

Development of defect interaction criteria for pipeline girth welds subjected to plastic collapse conditions. In: ASME 2006 pressure vessels and piping division conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 23–27 July. New York: ASME.

23.

Bezensek

Hancock

JW.

The re-characterisation of complex defects: Part II: cleavage. Eng Fract Mech 2004; 71: 1001–1019.

24.

Sharples

Wilkes

Beardsmore

et al . Further studies of multiple coplanar surface breaking flaws for cleavage fracture. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 pressure vessel and piping conference (PVP2008), Chicago, IL, 27–31 July 2008. New York: ASME.

25.

Sharples

Wilkes

Beardsmore

et al . Further analysis of multiple co-planar flaws under cleavage failure conditions. In: Proceeding of the ASME 2007 pressure vessel and piping conference (PVP2007), San Antonio, TX, 22–26 July 2007. New York: ASME.

26.

Bezensek

Hancock

JW.

The re-characterisation of complex defects. Part I: fatigue and ductile tearing. Eng Fract Mech 2004; 71: 1001–1020.

27.

Tang

Fairchild

Cheng

et al . Development of surface flaw interaction rules for strain-based pipelines. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth international ocean and polar engineering conference, Busan, South Korea, 15–20 June 2014, pp.476–486. Mountain View, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.

28.

BS 8571:2014. Method of test for determination of fracture toughness in metallic materials using single edge notched tension.

29.

Samadian

Hertelé

De Waele

Elastic-plastic defect interaction in (a)symmetrical double edge notched tension specimens. AIMS Mater Sci 2017; 4: 277–291.

30.

Kim

N-H.

Introduction to nonlinear finite element analysis. 1st ed. New York: Springer.

31.

Fagerholt

Østby

Børvik

et al . Investigation of fracture in small-scale SENT tests of a welded X80 pipeline steel using digital image correlation with node splitting. Eng Fract Mech 2012; 96: 276–293.

32.

Hertelé

Gerven

Van Naib

et al . Experimental and numerical slip line analysis of welded single-edge notched tension specimens. Procedia Struct Integr 2016; 2: 1763–1770.

33.

Van Gerven

De Waele

Belato Rosado

et al . Characterization of slip lines in single edge notched tension specimens. Sustain Constr Des 2015; 6: 1–7.

34.

Rules for construction of nuclear facility components: ASME boiler and pressure vessels code—section III. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017.

35.

Anderson

TL.

Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. Portland, OR: Taylor & Francis, 2017.

36.

S-X

Mai

Y-W

Cotterell

Slip-line field solutions of three-point bend specimens with deep notches. Int J Mech Sci 1987; 29: 557–564.

37.

Samadian

Hertelé

De Waele

A novel flaw alignment approach based on the analysis of bands of maximum strain using full-field deformation measurements. Procedia Struct Integr 2017; 5: 1245–1252.