This work addresses the problem of describing ductile fracture behavior and predicting ductile failure initiation in dented pipelines under tensile loading based upon a 3-D computational cell approach coupled with a stress-modified, critical strain (SMCS) criterion for void coalescence. A series of tension tests conducted on notched tensile specimens with different notch radius for a carbon steel pipe provides the stress–strain response of the tested structural steel from which the SMCS criterion is calibrated. Full scale cyclic bend tests also performed on a 165 mm O.D tubular specimen with 11 mm wall thickness enable verification of the proposed approach in assessing ductile cracking behavior in damaged pipelines. These exploratory analyses predict the tensile failure load for the pipe specimen associated with ductile crack initiation in the highly damaged area inside the denting and buckling zone which are in good agreement with experimental measurements.
YoussefNFGBonowitzDGrossJL. A survey of steel moment-resisting frame buildings affected by the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. Technical Report NISTIR 5625, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 1995.
2.
MoncarzPDMcDonaldBMCaligiuriRD. Earthquake failures of welded building connections. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38(10–13): 2025–2032.
3.
BarsonJM. Fatigue and fracture behavior of moment frame connections under seismic loading (Northridge Earthquake). In: PiascikRSReuterWG (eds.) Fatigue and fracture mechanics, vol. 33 of ASTM STP 1417. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2002, pp.57–72.
4.
ToyodaMOhataMAyukawaN, et al. Ductile fracture initiation behavior of pipe under a large scale of cyclic bending. In: 3rd international pipeline technology conference (ed DenysR), Technologisch Instituut, Brugge, Belgium, 2000, vol. II, pp.87–102.
5.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. The January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu (Kobe) earthquake. NIST Special Publication 901, 1996.
6.
OkashitaKOhminamiRMichibaK, et al. Investigation of the brittle fracture at the corner of P75 rigid-frame pier in Kobe Harbor Highway during the Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng1998; 1998(591)L 243–261, (in Japanese).
7.
TamuraHSasakiEYamadaH, et al. Involvements of stress triaxiality in brittle fracture during eartquakes in steel bridge bents. Int J Steel Struct2009; 9(3): 241–252.
8.
TodaSHatayaRAbeS, et al. The 1995 Kobe earthquake and problems of evaluation of active faults in Japan. Eng Geol1996; 43: 151–167.
9.
PuttickKE. Ductile fracture in metals. Philos Mag1959; 4: 964–969.
10.
RogersHC. The tensile fracture of ductile metals. Trans Metall Soc AIME1960; 218: 498–506.
11.
GurlandJPlateauJ. The mechanism of ductile rupture of metals containing inclusions. Trans Am Soc Met1963; 56: 442–454.
12.
Van StoneRCoxTLowJ, et al. Microstructural aspects of fracture by dimpled rupture. Int Met Rev1985; 30: 157–179.
McClintockFA. A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech1968; 90: 363–371.
15.
RiceJRTraceyDM. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids1969; 17: 201–217.
16.
HancockJWMackenzieAC. On the mechanism of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states. J Mech Phys Solids1976; 24: 147–169.
17.
MackenzieAHancockJBrownD. On the influence of state of stress on ductile fracture initiation in high strength steels. Eng Fract Mech1977; 9: 167–188.
18.
NeedlemanA. A numerical study of necking in circular cylindical bars. J Mech Phys Solids1972; 20: 111–127.
19.
TvergaardVNeedlemanA. Analysis of cup-cone fracture in round tensile bar. Acta Metall1984; 32: 157–169.
20.
BeckerRNeedlemanARichmondO, et al. Void growth and failure in notched bars. J Mech Phys Solids1988; 36: 317–351.
21.
SadasueTIgiS. Ductile cracking evaluation of X80/X100 high strength linepipes. In 10th International Pipeline Conference (IPC 2004), no. IPC04-0249, Calgary, Canada, 2004, pp.1661–1669.
22.
OhCKKimYJBaekJH, et al. Development of stress-modified fracture strain for ductile failure of api x65 steel. Int J Fract2007; 143(2): 119–133.
23.
OhCKKimNHKimYJ, et al. A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model. Eng Fract Mech2011; 78(1): 124–137.
24.
IshikawaNSueyoshiHIgiS. Application of damage mechanics modeling to strain based design with respect to ductile crack initiation. In: 8th international pipeline conference (IPC 2010), no. IPC2010-31506, Calgary, Canada, 2010, pp.279–286. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
25.
SuzukiNTakikaHIgiS, et al. Local buckling behavior of 48”, X80 high-strain line pipes. In: 8th international pipeline conference (IPC 2010), no. IPC2010-31637, Calgary, Canada, 2010, pp.347–354. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
26.
IgiSOhataMSakimotoT, et al. Ductile crack extension analysis for X80 bending deformation using damage-based model. In: 10th international pipeline conference (IPC 2014), no. IPC2014-33432, Calgary, Canada, 2014, pp.1–8. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
27.
MariniBMudryFPineauA. Experimental study of cavity growth in ductile rupture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics1985; 22(6): 989–996.
HuangY. Accurate dilatation rate for spherical voids in triaxial stress fields. J Appl Mech1991; 58: 1084–1096.
30.
American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard specification for seamless carbon steel pipe for high-temperature service, ASTM A106, 2015.
31.
OhataMToyodaM. Application of equivalent damage concept to evaluation of ductile cracking for linepipe under large scale seismic loading. In: 22nd international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE 2003), vol. 3, Cancun, Mexico, 2003, pp.1–10. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
32.
DieterG. Mechanical metallurgy. New York: McGraw-Hill Science and Engineering, 1986.
33.
ToyodaMOhataMYokotaM, et al. Criterion for ductile cracking for the evaluation of steel structure under large scale cyclic loading. In: 20th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE 2001), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2001, pp.1–14.
34.
HealyBGullerudAKoppenhoeferK, et al. WARP3D: 3-D nonlinear finite element analysis of solids for fracture and fatigue processes, Technical Report, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, www.warp3d.net, September, 2020.
