Metamaterials are often studied for their peculiar mechanical properties. However, few 4D studies were conducted on 3D printed pantographs. This study aims at analyzing an in situ torsion test in a lab tomograph. The acquired scans were used to measure displacement fields via digital volume correlation. The final goal was to analyze the deformation mechanisms of an Inconel pantograph and to rationalize potential Poynting effects.
PoyntingJ.On pressure perpendicular to the shear planes in finite pure shears, and on the lengthening of loaded wires when twisted. Proc R Soc London1909; A82(557): 546–559.
3.
PoyntingJ.The changes in length and volume of an Indian-rubber cord when twisted. India-Rubber J1913; 4: 6.
4.
GeorgievskiiD.Types of physical nonlinearity in the theory of constitutive relations and the generalized poynting effect. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019. pp.129–136.
5.
MisraALekszyckiTGiorgioI, et al. Pantographic metamaterials show atypical Poynting effect reversal. Mech Res Commun2018; 89: 6–10.
6.
BarchiesiESpagnuoloMPlacidiL.Mechanical metamaterials: a state of the art. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(1): 212–234.
7.
dell’IsolaFSeppecherPAlibertJJ, et al. Pantographic metamaterials: an example of mathematically driven design and of its technological challenges. Contin Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(4): 851–884.
8.
TurcoEdell’IsolaFCazzaniA, et al. Hencky-type discrete model for pantographic structures: numerical comparison with second gradient continuum models. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67: 85.
9.
BarchiesiEPlacidiL.A review on models for the 3D statics and 2D dynamics of pantographic fabrics. Singapore: Springer, 2017. pp.239–258.
10.
GiorgioIRizziNTurcoE.Continuum modelling of pantographic sheets for out-of-plane bifurcation and vibrational analysis. Proc R Soc A2017; 473: 20170636.
11.
TurcoE.How the properties of pantographic elementary lattices determine the properties of pantographic metamaterials. Cham: Springer, 2019. pp.489–506.
12.
GiorgioIRizziNAndreausU, et al. A two-dimensional continuum model of pantographic sheets moving in a 3D space and accounting for the offset and relative rotations of the fibers. Math Mech Complex Sys2019; 7(4): 311–325.
13.
dell’IsolaFCuomoMGrecoL, et al. Bias extension test for pantographic sheets: numerical simulations based on second gradient shear energies. J Eng Math2017; 103(1): 127–157.
14.
TurcoEMisraAPawlikowskiM, et al. Enhanced piola–hencky discrete models for pantographic sheets with pivots without deformation energy: numerics and experiments. Int J Solids Struct2018; 147: 94–109.
GanzoschGHoschkeKLekszyckiT, et al. 3D-Measurements of 3D-Deformations of pantographic structures. Tech Mech2018; 38(3): 233–245.
17.
BarchiesiEGanzoschGLieboldC, et al. Out-of-plane buckling of pantographic fabrics in displacement-controlled shear tests: experimental results and model validation. Contin Mech Thermodyn2018; 31: 33–45.
18.
DufourJEHildFRouxS.Shape, displacement and mechanical properties from isogeometric multiview stereocorrelation. J Strain Anal Eng Des2015; 50(7): 470–487.
19.
dell’IsolaFLekszyckiTSpagnuoloM, et al. Experimental methods in pantographic structures. In: dell’IsolaFSteigmannD (eds.) Discrete and continuum models for complex metamaterials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020, pp.263–297.
20.
MaireEWithersPJ.Quantitative X-ray tomography. Int Mater Rev2014; 59(1): 1–43.
21.
Taillandier-ThomasTRouxSMorgeneyerT, et al. Localized strain field measurement on laminography data with mechanical regularization. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B2014; 324: 70–79.
22.
dell’IsolaFSeppecherPSpagnuoloM, et al. Advances in pantographic structures: design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses. Contin Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(4): 1231–1282.
23.
LeclercHNeggersJMathieuF, et al. Correli 3.0. IDDN.FR.001.520008.000.S.P.2015.000.31500. Paris (France): Agence pour la Protection des Programmes, 2015.
24.
RouxSHildF.Stress intensity factor measurements from digital image correlation: post-processing and integrated approaches. Int J Fract2006; 140(1–4): 141–157.
25.
GueryALatourteFHildF, et al. Characterization of SEM speckle pattern marking and imaging distortion by digital image correlation. Meas Sci Technol2014; 25(1): 015401.
26.
NeggersJBlaysatBHoefnagelsJPM, et al. On image gradients in digital image correlation. Int J Numer Methods Eng2016; 105(4): 243–260.
27.
PassieuxJCBouclierR.Classic and inverse compositional Gauss-Newton in global DIC. Int J Numer Methods Eng2019; 119(6): 453–468.
28.
MendozaASchneiderJParraE, et al. The correlation framework: bridging the gap between modeling and analysis for 3D woven composites. Compos Struct2019; 229: 111468.
29.
BuljacAJailinCMendozaA, et al. Digital volume correlation: review of progress and challenges. Exp Mech2018; 58(5): 661–708.
30.
BuljacATaillandier-ThomasTHelfenL, et al. Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of digital volume correlation applied to laminography data. J Strain Anal Eng Des2018; 53: 49–65.
31.
SpagnuoloMBarczKPfaffA, et al. Qualitative pivot damage analysis in aluminum printed pantographic sheets: numerics and experiments. Mech Res Commun2017; 83: 47–52.
32.
MGrédiacFHild (eds.) Full-field measurements and identification in solid mechanics. London, UK: ISTE/Wiley, 2012.
33.
HildFBouterfAChamoinL, et al. Toward 4D mechanical correlation. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci2016; 3(1): 1–26.
34.
BuljacATrejo-NavasVMShakoorM, et al. On the calibration of elastoplastic parameters at the microscale via X-ray microtomography and digital volume correlation for the simulation of ductile damage. Eur J Mech A Solids2018; 72: 287–297.
