This paper explores articulations of the value of investment in culture and the arts through a critical discourse analysis of policy documents, reports and academic commentary since 1997. It argues that in this period, discourses around the value of culture have moved from a focus on the direct economic contributions of the culture industries to their indirect economic benefits. These indirect benefits are discussed here under three main headings: creativity and innovation, employability, and social inclusion. These are in turn analysed in terms of three forms of capital: human, social and cultural. The paper concludes with an analysis of this discursive shift through the lens of autonomist Marxist concerns with the labour of social reproduction. It is our argument that, in contemporary policy discourses on culture and the arts, the government in the UK is increasingly concerned with the use of culture to form the social in the image of capital. As such, we must turn our attention beyond the walls of the factory in order to understand the contemporary capitalist production of value and resistance to it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adorno, T. W & M. Horkheimer (1979) Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. J. Cumming (Verso).
2.
Arthur, C. J. (2004) ‘Value and negativity: A reply to Carchedi’, Capital & Class, no. 82, pp. 17–22.
3.
Arts Council of England, the National Museum Directors' Conference, the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, the Association of Independent Museums, the Group for Large Local Authority Museums, the Museums Association, the University Museums Group (2006) Values and Vision: The Contribution of Culture. Available online at www.nationalmuseums.org.uk.
4.
Arvidsson, A. (2007) ‘Creative class or administrative class? On advertising and the “underground”’, ephemera: theory & politics in organization, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8–23; online at www.ephemeraweb.org.
5.
Bailyn, L. (1985) ‘Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab’, Human Resource Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 129–146.
6.
Belfiore, E. (2006) ‘The social impacts of the arts: Myth or reality?’ in M. Mizra (ed.) Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? (Policy Exchange).
7.
Belfiore, E. (2007) ‘A matter of values’, Arts Professional, no. 140, 26 February, pp. 8–9.
8.
Belfiore, E. & O. Bennett (2007) ‘Rethinking the social impact of the arts’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 135–151.
9.
Boltanski, L. & E. Chiapello (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism (Verso).
10.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Routledge).
11.
Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature (Polity).
12.
Brown, A. (1998) Organizational Culture (Financial Times Pitman Publishing).
13.
Caffentzis, G. (2005) ‘Immeasurable value? An essay on Marx's legacy’, The Commoner, no. 10, pp. 87–114.
14.
Cámara Izquierdo, S. (2006) ‘A value-oriented distinction between productive and unproductive labour’, Capital & Class, no. 90, pp. 37–63.
15.
Dalla Costa, M. & S. James (1975) The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community (Falling Wall Press).
16.
Das, R. J. (2006) ‘Putting social capital in its place’, Capital & Class, no. 90, pp. 65–92.
17.
DCMS (2007) Culture and Creativity in 2007 (DCMS); available online at www.culture.gov.uk.
18.
De Angelis, M. (2005) ‘Value(s), measure(s) and disciplinary markets’, The Commoner, no. 10, pp. 65–86.
19.
De Angelis, M. (2006) The Beginning of History: Value Struggles and Global Capital (Pluto).
20.
Dowling, E. (2007) ‘Producing the dining experience: Measure, subjectivity and the affective worker’, ephemera: theory & politics in organization, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 117–132; online at www.ephemeraweb.org.
21.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999) Cyber-Marx (University of Illinois Press).
22.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (2002) ‘Global body, global brain/global factory, global war: Revolt of the value-subjects’, The Commoner, no. 3, pp. 1–30, January; online at www.commoner.org.uk.
23.
Edwards, R. (1997) Changing Places? Flexibility, Lifelong Learning and a Learning Society (Routledge).
24.
Elson, D. (1979) ‘The value theory of labour’, in D. Elson (ed.) Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism (CSE Books).
Florida, R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class (Basic Books).
27.
Florida, R. (2004) Cities and the Creative Class (Routledge).
28.
Glucksmann, M. (1995) ‘Why “work”? Gender and the “total social organization of labour”’, Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63–75.
29.
Glucksmann, M. (2005) ‘Shifting boundaries and interconnections: Extending the “total social organisation of labour”’, Sociological Review, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 19–36.
30.
Gray, C. (2002) ‘Local government and the arts’, Local Government Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 77–90.
31.
Grover, C. (2003) ‘“New Labour”, welfare reform and the reserve army of labour’, Capital & Class, no. 79, pp. 17–23.
32.
Hardt, M. & A. Negri (1994) The Labor of Dionysus (University of Minnesota Press).
33.
Hardt, M. & A. Negri (2000) Empire (Harvard University Press).
34.
Hardt, M. & A. Negri (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (Penguin).
35.
Harvie, D. (2006) ‘Value production and struggle in the classroom: Teachers within, against and beyond capital’, Capital & Class, no. 88, pp. 1–32.
36.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007) The Cultural Industries, 2nd edition (Sage).
37.
Holden, J. (2004) Capturing Cultural Value: How Culture has Become a Tool of Government Policy (Demos).
38.
House of Commons (2002) First Report - DCMS - National Museums and Galleries: Funding and Free Admission (HMSO).
39.
Hyland, M. (2006) ‘Proud scum: The spectre of the ingrate’, Mute, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 19–25.
40.
Jordan, T & P. Taylor (2004) Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause? (Routledge).
41.
Jowell, T (2004) Government and the Value of Culture (HMSO/DCMS).
42.
Kelly, O., E. Wojdat & N. Khan (1997) The Creative Bits: The Social Impacts of the Arts Using Digital Technology (Comedia).
43.
Kennedy, P. (2005) ‘Social policy, social exclusion and commodity fetishism’, Capital & Class, no. 85, pp. 91–114.
44.
Kicillof, A. & G. Starosta (2007) ‘Value form and class struggle: A critique of the autonomist theory of value’, Capital & Class, no. 92, pp. 13–40.
45.
Lazzarato, M. (1996) ‘Immaterial labour’, in P. Virno & M. Hardt (eds.) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (University of Minnesota Press).
46.
Leadbeater, C. (1999) Living on Thin Air: The New Economy (Viking).
47.
Local Government Association (LGA) (2003) Creative Consequences: The Contribution and Impact of the Arts in Essex: 2001/02 (LGA Publications).
48.
Marx, K. (1973 [1857]) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, trans. M. Nicolaus (Penguin).
49.
Marx, K. (1976 [1867]) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume I, trans. B. Fowkes (Penguin).
50.
Marx, K. (1992 [1885]) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume II, trans. D. Fernbach (Penguin).
51.
Matarasso, E (1997) Use or Ornament? The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts (Comedia).
52.
Merli, P. (2002) ‘Evaluating the social impact of participation in arts activities: A critical review of Francois Matarasso's Use or Ornament’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107–118.
53.
Mizra, M. (ed.) (2006) Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? (Policy Exchange).
54.
Mohun, S. (1996) ‘Productive and unproductive labor in the labor theory of value’, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 30–54.
55.
Negri, A. (1989) The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-First Century (Polity).
56.
Negri, A. (1991) Marx beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse (Autonomedia).
57.
Negri, A. (1999) ‘Value and affect’, Boundary 2, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 77–88.
58.
Newell, S., M. Robertson, H. Scarbrough & J. Swan (2003) Managing Knowledge Work (Palgrave).
59.
Oakley, A. (1974) The Sociology of Housework (Pantheon).
60.
Paltridge, B. (2006) Discourse Analysis (Continuum).
61.
Poulter, D. & C. Land (2008) ‘Preparing to work: Dramaturgy, cynicism and normative “remote” control in the socialization of graduate recruits in management consulting’, Culture and Organization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65–78.
62.
Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Revival and Collapse of American Community (Simon and Schuster).
63.
Raymond, E. (2001) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary (O'Reilly).
64.
Rehn, A. (2001) ‘Electronic potlatch: A study on new technologies and primitive economic behaviors’, Ph.D thesis, available online at www.alfrehn.com.
65.
Rose, N. (1996) ‘The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government’, Economy and Society, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 327–356.
66.
Ross, A. (2000) ‘The mental labor problem’, Social Text, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–31.
67.
Sennett, R. (2008) The Craftsman (Allen Lane).
68.
Shorthose, J. (2004) ‘The engineered and the vernacular in cultural quarter development’, Capital & Class, no. 84, pp. 159–178.
69.
Shorthose, J. & G. Strange (2004) ‘The new cultural economy, the artist and the social configuration of autonomy’, Capital & Class, no. 84, pp. 43–59.
70.
Tapscott, D. (1996) The Digital Economy (McGraw Hill).
71.
Terranova, T (2000) ‘Free Labor: Producing culture for the digital economy’, Social Text, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 33–58.
72.
Terranova, T (2004) Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age (Pluto).
73.
Thompson, P. (2005) ‘Foundation and Empire: A critique of Hardt and Negri’, Capital & Class, no. 86, pp. 73–100.
74.
Wenger, E., R. McDermott & W. Snyder (2003) Cultivating Communities of Practice (Harvard Business School Press).
75.
Wittel, A. (2004) ‘Culture, labour and subjectivity: For a political economy from below’, Capital & Class, no. 84, pp. 11–30.
