The time-course of propofol concentrations in the blood and brain following rapid administration of three doses were examined using a sheep preparation and regional pharmacokinetic techniques. These were compared to the time-course of cerebral effects of propofol reported previously. There were marked differences between the time-course of propofol concentrations in arterial blood and the brain, with a close relationship between the time-course of brain concentrations and effects on depth of anaesthesia and CBF. There was evidence that the effect of propofol on cerebral blood flow altered its own rate of elution from the brain. Hysteresis between arterial propofol concentrations and cerebral effects following rapid IV administration therefore appears to have a pharmacokinetic basis, and conventional compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis using blood concentrations alone may fail to accurately predict the time-course of both brain propofol concentrations and depth of anaesthesia.
KantoJ, GeptsE.Pharmacokinetic implications for the clinical use of propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet1989; 17(5):308–326.
2.
ChiouWL.Potential pitfalls in the conventional pharma-cokinetic studies: Effects of initial mixing in blood and the pulmonary first pass elimination. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm1979; 7:527–536.
3.
HuangYF, UptonRN, RuncimanWB.I.V. bolus administration of subconvulsive doses of lignocaine to conscious sheep: relationships between myocardial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Br J Anaesth1993; 70:556–561.
4.
RuncimanWB, UptonRN.Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics—what is of value to practising anaesthetists?Anaesth Pharmacol Rev1994; 2:280–293.
5.
LarssonJF, WahlstromG.Optimum rate of administration of propofol for induction of anaesthesia in rats. Br J Anaesth1994; 73:692–694.
6.
StokesDN, HuttonP.Rate-dependent induction phenomena with propofol: implications for the relative potency of intravenous anaesthetics. Anesth Analg1991; 72:578–583.
7.
LudbrookGL, UptonRN, GrantC, GrayEC.The cerebral effects of propofol following bolus administration in sheep. Anaesth Intens Care1996; 24:26–31.
8.
RuncimanWB, IlsleyAH, MatherLE, CarapetisRJ, RaoMM.A sheep preparation for studying interactions between blood flow and drug disposition I: Physiological profile. Br J Anaesth1984; 56:1015–1028.
9.
UptonRN, GrantC, LudbrookGL.An ultrasonic Doppler venous outflow method for the continuous measurement of cerebral blood flow in conscious sheep. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab1994; 14:680–688.
10.
LudbrookGL, GrantC, UptonRN, PenhallC.A method for frequent measurement of sedation and analgesia in sheep using the response to a ramped electrical stimulus. J Pharm Toxicol Res1995; 13:17–22.
11.
MatherLE, SelbyDG, RuncimanWB, McLeanCF.Propofol: assay and regional mass balance in the sheep. Xenobiotica1989; 19:1337–1347.
12.
UptonRN, MatherLE, RuncimanWB, NancarrowC, CarapetisRJ.The use of mass balance principles to describe regional drug distribution and elimination. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm1988; 16:13–29.
13.
UptonRN.An analysis of errors arising from the direct use of mass balance principles to describe regional drug uptake and elution. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm1994; 22:309–321.
14.
UptonRN.Towards target organ drug concentrations—application of mass balance principles. Anaesth Pharmacol Rev1994; 2:231–242.
15.
RoerigDL, KotrlyKJ, DawsonCA, AhlfSB, GualtieriJF, KampineJP.First-pass uptake of verapamil, diazepam and thiopental in the human lung. Anesth Analg1989; 69(4):461–466.
16.
RoerigDL, KotrlyKJ, VucinsEJ, AhlfSB, DawsonCA, KampineJP.First pass uptake of fentanyl, meperidine, and morphine in the human lung. Anesthesiology1987; 67:466–472.
17.
TaegerK, WeningerE, SchmelzerF, AdtM, FrankeN, PeterK.Pulmonary kinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in surgical patients. Br J Anaesth1988; 61(4):425–434.
18.
MatotI, NeelyCF, KatzRY, NeufeldGR.Pulmonary uptake of propofol in cats. Anesthesiology1993; 78:1157–1165.
19.
UptonRN, HuangYF.The influence of cardiac output, injection time and injection volume on the initial mixing of drugs with the venous blood after IV bolus administration to sheep. Br J Anaesth1993; 70:333–338.
20.
BjorkmanS, AkesonJ, NilssonF, MesseterK, RothB.Ketamine and midazolam decrease cerebral blood flow and consequently their own rate of transport to the brain: an application of mass balance pharmacokinetics with a changing regional blood flow. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm1992; 6:637–652.
21.
CavazzutiM, PorroCA, BarbieriA, GalettiA.Brain and spinal cord metabolic activity during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth1991; 66:490–495.
22.
FassoulkiA, FarinottiJ, MantzJ, DesmontsJM.Does tolerance develop to the anaesthetic effects of propofol in rats?Br J Anaesth1994; 72:127–128.
23.
HemelrijckJV, FitchW, MattheussenM, AkenHV, PletsC, LauwersT.Effect of propofol on cerebral circulation and autoregulation in the baboon. Anesth Analg1990; 71:49–54.
24.
StephanH, SonntagH, SchenkHD, KohljausenS.Effects of disoprivan on cerebral blood flow, cerebral oxygen consumption and cerebro-vascular response to CO2. Anaesthetist1987; 36:60–65.
25.
RamaniR, ToddMM, WarnerDS.A dose-response study of the influence of propofol on cerebral blood flow, metabolism and the electroencephalogram in the rabbit. J Neurosurg Anesth1992; 4:110–119.
26.
CraenRA, GelbAW, MurkinJM, ChongKY.Human cerebral autoregulation is maintained during propofol air/O2 anesthesia. Anesthesiology1992; 77:A220.
27.
WernerC, HoffmanWE, KochsE, Schulte am EschJ, AlbrechtRF.The effects of propofol on cerebral and spinal cord blood flow in rats. Anesth Analg1993; 76:971–975.
