Association between headache frequency and risk for fibromyalgia in patients with migraine

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed to evaluate the risk and impact of fibromyalgia in relation to headache frequency in migraine patients.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved migraine patients from a regional hospital and a tertiary medical center. Diagnoses of migraine and fibromyalgia were made according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, and the modified 2016 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria, respectively. Clinical data, including Fibromyalgia Symptoms (FS) scale and revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), were collected systematically by questionnaires-based interviews. Patients were categorized based on monthly headache day (MHD) cut-offs derived from decision tree analysis based on the chi-squared automatic interaction detection algorithm.

Results

The study involved 2082 migraine patients (1619 female/463 male, mean ± SD age 39.3 ± 12.0 years), including 132 with fibromyalgia (118 female/14 male, mean ± SD age 44.1 ± 12.7 years) (6.3%). Patients were divided into three groups: ≤9 MHDs (n = 924), 10–20 MHDs (n = 745) and ≥21 MHDs (n = 413). The percentage of fibromyalgia increased with headache frequency (p < 0.001). When compared with patients with ≤9 MHDs (2.8%), those with 10–20 MHDs (6.2%) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11–3.23, p = 0.019) and ≥21 MHDs (14.5%) (OR = 3.68, 95% CI = 2.08–6.49, p < 0.001) were more likely to have fibromyalgia. Patients with more frequent headaches had higher FS and FIQR scores (all p < 0.001 between MHD categories).

Conclusions

There was an independent dose–response association between headache frequency and odds, severity, and impact of fibromyalgia in migraine patients. For migraine patients with a higher headache frequency, the potential risk of comorbid fibromyalgia should not be overlooked given its association with more severe clinical manifestations and greater disability.

Graphical abstract

This is a visual representation of the abstract.

Keywords

chronic migraine comorbidity fibromyalgia migraine risk factor

Introduction

Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain, unrefreshing sleep, physical exhaustion and cognitive impairment. The global prevalence of fibromyalgia ranges from 0.4 to 8.8%, with an average of approximately 2.7%. (1,2) Indeed, it is the second most common rheumatic disorder (3) and the third most common musculoskeletal condition. (1) Fibromyalgia could be associated with significant disability, which could lead to substantial impacts on the quality of life of patients, as well as tremendous socioeconomic burdens. (4) Timely diagnosis is important for early management, which may improve the outcome of such patients. However, fibromyalgia remains under-recognized and under-diagnosed. (5) Identification of patients at risk should be a critical step to optimize the clinical management.

Migraine is the second most prevalent neurological disorder globally and ranks among the top three leading causes of disease-related disability in most countries. (6) An association between migraine and fibromyalgia has been reported in the literature: migraine is one of the commonly reported comorbidities of fibromyalgia and vice versa. (7,8) Migraine is seen in approximately 14–15% of the general population across different regions of the world. (9,10) However, the percentages of comorbid fibromyalgia in migraine and comorbid migraine in fibromyalgia are much higher than the population prevalence of each of the conditions alone, (11 –14) which suggest overlaps in pathophysiology. Because migraine shares several risk factors with fibromyalgia, such as depression, sleep problem, stress, obesity, etc., (3,15,16) it could be hypothesized that the association between migraine and fibromyalgia would be stronger in patients with higher headache frequencies.

The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk of fibromyalgia, as well as its severity and impact of symptoms of fibromyalgia, in relation to headache frequency in migraine patients.

Methods

Patients

This cross-sectional study involved retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of consecutive migraine patients recruited at their first visit to the headache clinics of a regional hospital (Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital) and a tertiary medical center (Taipei Veterans General Hospital). Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire as part of the routine evaluation for headache patients at their first visit, which was followed by evaluation by headache specialists. The diagnosis of migraine was based on the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) (17) and the diagnosis of fibromyalgia was made according to the modified 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria (see supplementary material, Table S1). (18) Patients were included if they were (a) aged between 20 and 80 years, (b) fulfilled the ICHD-3 criteria for migraine with aura, or migraine without aura and (c) had medical records available for analysis. The exclusion criteria included (a) headaches with the onset within one month, (b) coexistence of other primary or secondary headache disorder(s) and (c) incomplete questionnaires that precluded further analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital (No. 1130002906) and Taipei Veterans General Hospital (No. 2024-06-005CC).

Questionnaire

The questionnaire was designed to collect clinical profiles, headache characteristics, medication use, psychological disturbances and sleep quality. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scale was used to evaluate headache-related disability, and patients with a MIDAS score of ≥11 were categorized as having moderate-to-severe disability. (19) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to screen for symptoms of anxiety and depression. Depression was defined as a depression score (HADS-D) of ≥11, whereas anxiety was defined as an anxiety score (HADS-A) of ≥11. (20) Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with a PSQI score of >5 implying poor sleep quality. (21) Furthermore, the presence of widespread pain and non-pain symptoms of fibromyalgia was assessed using the widespread pain index (WPI) and symptom severity (SS) score, respectively. (22,23) The severity of manifestations of fibromyalgia was evaluated by the Fibromyalgia Symptom (FS) scale, comprising the sum of WPI and SS scores, (22) and the impact of presentations of fibromyalgia was measured using the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), which consists of three health domains: physical function, overall impact and symptoms. (24) An FIQR score ≤30, 31–45 and ≥46 indicates remission, mild severity and moderate-to-severe severity, respectively. (25) All migraine patients were asked to complete the WPI, SS and FIQR regardless of whether a diagnosis of fibromyalgia could be fulfilled. The responses to the questions in the questionnaire were verified at subsequent face-to-face interviews.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data are expressed as the mean ± SD or n (%). Numerical data, such as age, monthly headache days (MHDs), number of days with acute medication use, scores of neuropsychological instruments, etc., between groups were compared using Student's t-test. A chi-squared test was used to evaluate between-group differences for categorical variables. Patients were grouped based on MHDs cut-offs derived from decision tree analysis based on the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm, (26) using fibromyalgia as the dependent variable, and MHD, age, sex, education level, marital status, employment status, aura status, average headache severity, medication overuse, moderate-to-severe disability, depression, anxiety and poor sleep as the independent variables. The FS and FIQR scores were compared among these three groups of patients by one-way analysis of variance, followed by post-hoc analysis with Fisher's least significant difference method. Categorical or ordinal variables among headache frequency categories were compared using the chi-squared test and the chi-squared test for trend. Logistic regression modeling (enter) was carried out to estimate the odds ratios (ORs), as well the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for the risk of fibromyalgia in relation to headache frequency categories, which were further adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, employment status, aura status, average headache severity, the presence of medication overuse, at least moderate disability, depression, anxiety and poor sleep quality. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS, version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study participants

During the study period, 4051 headache new patients were screened. After excluding patients with headache onset within one month (n = 199) or other headache disorders (n = 1156), as well as those with incomplete questionnaires (n = 614) (Figure 1), 2082 migraine patients (1619 female/463 mala, mean ± SD age 39.3 ± 12.0 years) were included in the analysis.

Figure 1.

Patient recruitment in the present study.

Clinical characteristics of migraine patients with comorbid fibromyalgia

Among the entire study population, 132 patients were diagnosed as having fibromyalgia (118 female/14 male, mean ± SD age 44.1 ± 12.7 years) (6.3%). Comorbid fibromyalgia in migraine was associated with an older age (mean ± SD age 44.1 ± 12.7 years vs. 39.0 ± 11.9 years, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of women (89.4% vs. 77.0%, p = 0.001), lower percentages of having a bachelor's degree or higher (60.6% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.001) or being employed (62.9% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.013), higher headache frequency (19.2 ± 10.0 vs. 12.4 ± 9.4 MHDs, p < 0.001), greater average headache severity (6.9 ± 2.1 vs. 6.1 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) and more frequent acute medication use (8.7 ± 9.4 days/month vs. 6.8 ± 7.8 days/month, p = 0.029) (Table 1). Furthermore, patients with fibromyalgia had greater headache-related disability (MIDAS: 63.5 ± 70.4 vs. 30.1 ± 43.3, p < 0.001), more severe symptoms of anxiety (HADS-A: 11.5 ± 4.0 vs. 8.4 ± 4.1, p < 0.001) or depression (HADS-D: 9.7 ± 4.5 vs. 6.4 ± 4.1, p < 0.001) and poorer sleep quality (PSQI: 13.6 ± 3.9 vs. 9.6 ± 4.2, p < 0.001). In addition, they had higher FS (17.9 ± 3.8 vs. 7.4 ± 3.5, p < 0.001) and FIQR (44.6 ± 20.3 vs. 23.9 ± 17.3, p < 0.001) scores. On the other hand, there were no between-group differences in body mass index (BMI), marital status and aura status.

Table 1.

Comparisons between migraine patients with and without fibromyalgia.

	Total (n = 2082)	Without fibromyalgia (n = 1950)	With fibromyalgia (n = 132)	p value
Age (years)	39.3 ± 12.0	39.0 ± 11.9	44.1 ± 12.7	<0.001
Female gender, n (%)	1619 (77.8)	1501 (77.0)	118 (89.4)	0.001
Body mass index	22.7 ± 3.9	22.7 ± 3.8	22.9 ± 4.4	0.700
Bachelor's degree or higher, n (%)	1544 (74.2)	1464 (75.1)	80 (60.6)	<0.001
Being married, n (%)	958 (46.0)	891 (45.7)	67 (50.8)	0.298
Being employed, n (%)	1512 (72.6)	1429 (73.3)	83 (62.9)	0.013
Migraine with aura, n (%)	189 (9.1)	182 (9.3)	7 (5.3)	0.161
Monthly headache days (days/month)	12.8 ± 9.5	12.4 ± 9.4	19.2 ± 10.0	<0.001
Average headache severity	6.2 ± 2.0	6.1 ± 2.0	6.9 ± 2.1	<0.001
Monthly days with acute medication use (days/month)	6.9 ± 7.9	6.8 ± 7.8	8.7 ± 9.4	0.029
MIDAS	32.2 ± 46.2	30.1 ± 43.3	63.5 ± 70.4	<0.001
HADS-A	8.6 ± 4.2	8.4 ± 4.1	11.5 ± 4.0	<0.001
HADS-D	6.6 ± 4.2	6.4 ± 4.1	9.7 ± 4.5	<0.001
PSQI	9.9 ± 4.3	9.6 ± 4.2	13.6 ± 3.9	<0.001
FS score	8.0 ± 4.3	7.4 ± 3.5	17.9 ± 3.8	<0.001
FIQR score	25.3 ± 18.2	23.9 ± 17.3	44.6 ± 20.3	<0.001

FIQR = revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; FS = fibromyalgia symptom; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (A = anxiety subscale; D = depression subscale); MIDAS = Migraine Disability Assessment; MOH = medication-overuse headache; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Association between headache frequency and risk of fibromyalgia

A CHAID decision tree was generated with 13 terminal nodes and three layers deep (Figure 2). Headache frequency was the most decisive variable at the time of classification, and patients were thereby divided into three categories: ≤9 MHDs (n = 924), 10–20 MHDs (n = 745) and ≥21 MHDs (n = 413).

Figure 2.

Tree created by the CHAID (i.e. chi-squared automatic interaction detection) model. HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (A = anxiety subscale); MHD = monthly headache day; MIDAS = Migraine Disability Assessment; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

The percentages of fibromyalgia were 2.8, 6.2 and 14.5% in patients with ≤9 MHDs, 10–20 MHDs and ≥21 MHDs, respectively, and there was a positive correlation (p < 0.001, chi-squared test for trend) (Figure 3A). When compared with patients with ≤9 MHDs, those with 10–20 MHDs (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.39–3.71, p = 0.010) and ≥21 MHDs (OR = 5.87, 95% CI = 3.65–9.45], p < 0.001) were more likely to have fibromyalgia, and there was no sex difference (p = 0.630 for sex-by-MHD-category interaction). There remained a gradient in the odds for having fibromyalgia for patients with 10–20 MHDs (OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.11–3.23, p = 0.019) and ≥21 MHDs (OR = 3.68, 95% CI = 2.08–6.49, p < 0.001) compared to patients with ≤9 MHDs, after controlling for age, sex, education level, marital status, employment status, aura status, average headache severity, medication overuse, moderate-to-severe disability, depression, anxiety and poor sleep (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Risk of fibromyalgia in relation to headache frequency categories. Patients with more frequent headache attacks were more likely to have fibromyalgia (p < 0.001) (chi-squared test for trend) (A). Patients in the higher headache frequency categories had greater odds for having fibromyalgia (B). *Adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, employment status, aura status, average headache severity, medication overuse, moderate-to-severe disability, depression, anxiety and poor sleep. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

Severity and impact of fibromyalgia in relation to headache frequency

Patients with more frequent headaches had higher FS scores (≤9 MHDs: 6.9 ± 3.7; 9–20 MHDs: 8.4 ± 4.3; ≥21 MHDs: 10.0 ± 4.9) (all p < 0.001 between groups) (Figure 4A) and were more likely to have moderate-to-severe impact from clinical manifestations of fibromyalgia as measured by the FIQR (≤9 MHDs: 7.9%; 9–20 MHDs: 13.2%; ≥21 MHDs: 25.7%) (p < 0.001, chi-squared test for trend) (Figure 4B). Patients in the higher headache frequency categories had higher FIQR scores (all p < 0.001) (Table 2). When the three domains of FIQR were analyzed separately, there were positive correlations between MHD categories and the scores in the overall impact domain (all p < 0.001 between groups), symptoms domain (all p < 0.001 between groups) and physical functional domain (p = 0.025 for ≤9 MHD vs. 10–20 MHD, and otherwise p < 0.001 between groups) (Table 2).

Figure 4.

Severity and impact of fibromyalgia symptoms in relation to headache frequency categories. Patients in the higher headache frequency categories had higher FS scores (all p < 0.001 between groups, except p = 0.008 for HFEM vs. LFCM, ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis using the least significant difference method) (A) and were more likely to have moderate-to-severe impact from symptoms of fibromyalgia (p < 0.001, chi-squared test) (B). FIQR = revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; FS = Fibromyalgia Symptoms scale.

Table 2.

Comparisons between migraine patients with and without fibromyalgia.

	≤9 MHD (n = 924)	10–20 MHD (n = 745)	≥21 MHD (n = 413)	p value^a
FIQR score^b	20.4 ± 16.2	26.4 ± 16.8	34.1 ± 20.9	<0.001
Function^c	2.3 ± 4.8	2.8 ± 5.0	4.4 ± 6.5	<0.001
Impact^b	3.5 ± 4.9	4.8 ± 5.3	6.8 ± 6.6	<0.001
Symptoms^b	14.6 ± 9.4	18.8 ± 9.5	22.8 ± 10.8	<0.001

Analysis of variance.

all p < 0.001 between groups.

all p < 0.001 between groups, except p = 0.025 for ≤ 9 MHD vs. 10–20 monthly headache days.

FIQR = revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; MHD = monthly headache days.

Discussion

In the present study, migraine patients with a higher headache frequency had a greater risk of fibromyalgia. Furthermore, headache frequencies were positively correlated with the severity and impact of fibromyalgia. In the clinical evaluation of migraine, clinicians should be alerted to the potential risk of comorbid fibromyalgia, especially in patients with ≥10 MHDs. Considering the association between comorbid fibromyalgia and more severe manifestations and clinical impact of migraine, the importance of early identification of patients at risk could not be overemphasized. However, whether such patients could benefit from a more aggressive treatment approach remains to be determined.

One of the major strengths of the present study is its large sample size, with more than 2000 migraine patients being included in the analysis. In comparison, the majority of clinic- or hospital-based studies focusing on fibromyalgia in migraine in the literature recruited less than 150 patients. (13,14,27 –30) A large sample size could give a more accurate and comprehensive description of the association. Furthermore, patients were recruited from both a regional hospital and a tertiary medical center, which could help reduce selection bias. In addition, the data were collected systematically by questionnaires and were verified at face-to-face interviews by neurologists, and therefore should be of high quality and reliability. In comparison, cases in certain population-based studies were identified using diagnosis codes, (31,32) and coding inaccuracies could be an important concern. Furthermore, only demographics and clinical diagnoses were included in the analysis of those studies, whereas many of the important clinical manifestations were lacking.

In the present cohort of migraine patients, the headache frequency paralleled the risk of fibromyalgia, and there was no sex difference. When compared with patients with ≤9 MHDs, those with 10–20 MHDs and ≥21 MHDs had an approximately two-fold and more than 3.5-fold increase, respectively, with respect to the probability of having fibromyalgia. In the literature, most studies focused on the percentage of fibromyalgia within just one of the following diagnostic entities: episodic migraine (EM), chronic migraine (CM) or transformed migraine (TM). (13,14,29,30) There was inconsistent evidence suggesting that fibromyalgia was more common in CM than in EM. (11,27,33) However, only the percentages of fibromyalgia, based on the 1990 or 2010/2011 ACR criteria, (22,23,34) were reported in those studies, and it is uncertain whether the association could also be attributed to psychiatric comorbidities or other risk factors shared by fibromyalgia and CM. (2,15,35 –37) In the present study, there was an association between headache frequency and the risk of fibromyalgia, which remained significant after controlling for potential confounders. More importantly, the present study extended the findings beyond the dichotomy of CM and EM, and identified a dose–response relationship. Indeed, the risk was increased for patients with ≥10 MHDs, among whom a certain proportion belonged to the category of high-frequency EM. Recently, there were discussions on whether the 15-day threshold for CM is appropriate because it may not be able to capture all of the patients with high disease burdens and treatment needs. (38) Our findings might echo these arguments, because the increase in the risk of fibromyalgia was not limited to patients with ≥15 MHDs. Based on our findings, a headache frequency of ≥10 MHDs in migraine patients should prompt the treating physician to actively question the presence of clinical manifestations of fibromyalgia, rather than to just passively wait for self-reports by the patients.

Our findings deserve special attention because comorbid fibromyalgia in migraine was associated with a more severe phenotype and greater functional impact. When compared with those without fibromyalgia, migraine patients with a concomitant diagnosis of fibromyalgia have higher frequency or severity of headache, greater impact or disability, more symptoms of depression or anxiety, poorer quality of life and even increased suicidal risks. (13,27 –29,31,33,39,40) Indeed, certain chronic pain conditions, including migraine, fibromyalgia, temporomandibular disorder (TMD), etc., could coexist or coaggregate, and are referred to as chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). (41) COPCs are characterized by pain amplification and psychosocial vulnerability. (41) It was reported that CM patients with pain in more body regions had poorer physical and psychological functions and greater health-care utilization compared to those whose pain was limited to the head region. (42) Interestingly, it was also shown that widespread pain was a predictor of poor functional outcome following treatment for painful TMD. (43) It would be of clinical significance and importance to determine whether comorbid fibromyalgia in migraine could be associated with a poorer treatment response, and whether more aggressive treatment is needed for such patients.

The positive association between headache frequency of migraine and the risk and impact of fibromyalgia identified in the present study could be multifactorial. In addition to overlapping risk factors and clinical phenomenology, pathophysiological mechanisms shared by both conditions could play important roles, especially central sensitization and impaired descending pain modulation. (1,3,15,44) It was reported that migraine patients had lowered pain thresholds and allodynia in cephalic and extracephalic regions, which could be related to sensitization of the second- and third-order neurons of the trigemino-nociceptive pathway, and this phenomenon is more pronounced in patients with more frequent attacks. (15,45 –47) Patients with fibromyalgia could have many of the features associated with central sensitization, such as hyperalgesia, allodynia, temporal summation, etc., as well as activation of the pain matrix and loss of gray matter volume in structures involved in pain processing. (1,48 –51) Furthermore, it was also found that there were alterations in the descending modulatory mechanisms in migraine and fibromyalgia, indicating an imbalance between the facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms. (52 –54) Other potential mechanisms shared by both conditions include neuroinflammation, increased oxidative stress, etc. (55) On the other hand, although obesity is a commonly reported risk factor for migraine and fibromyalgia, (56,57) the BMIs were actually similar between patients with and without fibromyalgia in the present study. In particular, the average BMI in the present cohort was only 22.7 ± 3.9 kg/m². It remains to be determined whether this could be attributed to racial or ethnic differences. More studies are needed to understand the underlying pathophysiology, which could pave the way to the development of novel treatments.

The present study has some limitations. First, there could be concerns about generalizability. However, the study involved patients from a regional hospital and a tertiary medical center, and the study population could reflect a wide range of migraine patients. Second, symptoms of anxiety and depression, as well as sleep quality, were evaluated using neuropsychological instruments, rather than by formal psychiatric interviews. However, the neuropsychological instruments used in the present study have been well validated, and have been widely used in clinical studies of migraine and fibromyalgia. (19 –22,24) Finally, as a cross-sectional study, only associations, rather than causal relationships, could be demonstrated. Further studies of a longitudinal design are needed to determine the nature of the identified association.

In conclusion, there was a dose–response relationship between headache frequency and risk of fibromyalgia in migraine patients, independent of potential confounders. Furthermore, there were similar trends for the severity and impact of clinical manifestations of fibromyalgia. For migraine patients with a higher headache frequency, the potential risk of comorbid fibromyalgia should be taken into consideration with respect to its association with a more severe phenotype and greater disability. However, further studies are needed to determine whether proper management of migraine could help alleviate the risk or disability of fibromyalgia and whether comorbid fibromyalgia could have an impact on the treatment outcome of migraine. Clinical implications

Headache frequencies were positively and independently correlated with the odds of comorbid fibromyalgia in patients with migraine.

Migraine patients with more frequent headaches had greater severity and impact of clinical symptoms of fibromyalgia.

Symptoms of fibromyalgia should be proactively screened for in migraine patients with a higher headache frequency.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-cep-10.1177_03331024251317486 - Supplemental material for Association between headache frequency and risk for fibromyalgia in patients with migraine

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cep-10.1177_03331024251317486 for Association between headache frequency and risk for fibromyalgia in patients with migraine by Yen-Hui Liao, Yi-Shiang Tzeng, Shih-Pin Chen, Yu-Hsiang Ling, Wei-Ta Chen, Shuu-Jiun Wang and Yen-Feng Wang in Cephalalgia

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

WTC has received honoraria as a speaker from Allergan/AbbVie, Hava Bio-Pharma, Orient EuroPharma, Pfizer and Viatris. He has received research grants from the Taiwan National Science and Technology Council, and Taipei Veterans General Hospital. SJW has received personal fees as an advisor or speaker from Allergan/AbbVie, Orient EuroPharma, Pfizer and Percept; and has been the PI in trials sponsored by Allergan/AbbVie, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer and Orient EuroPharma. He has received research grants from the Taiwan National Science and Technology Council and Taipei Veterans General Hospital. YFW has received personal fees as an advisor or a speaker from Allergan/AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Hava Bio-Pharma, Lundbeck, Novartis, Orient EuroPharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Teva, UCB and Viatris. He has received research grants from the Taiwan National Science and Technology Council, and Taipei Veterans General Hospital. YHLiao, YST, SPC and YHLing reported no relevant disclosure.

Ethical statement

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Taipei Municipal Gan-Dau Hospital (No. 1130002906) and Taipei Veterans General Hospital (No. 2024-06-005CC).

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supportive by Taiwan National Science and Technology Council [110-2321-B-010-005, 111-2321-B-A49-004, 111-2314-B-075 -086 -MY3, 111-2321-B-A49-011, and 112-2321-B-075-007 (to SJW) and 109-2314-B-075 -054, 110-2314-B-075 -041 -MY3, and 113-2314-B-075 -049 -MY3 (to YFW)], Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW112-TDU-B-211-144001 (to SJW)], and Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V108C-092, V109C-096, V110C-111, V111C-161, V112C-078, V113C-123, and V112D67-003-MY3 (to YFW)]; this work was also supported by the Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

ORCID iDs

Yen-Hui Liao

Shih-Pin Chen

Yu-Hsiang Ling

Shuu-Jiun Wang

Yen-Feng Wang

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Sarzi-Puttini

Giorgi

Marotto

, et al. Fibromyalgia: an update on clinical characteristics, aetiopathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 16: 645–660.

Creed

. A review of the incidence and risk factors for fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain in population-based studies. Pain 2020; 161: 1169–1176.

Clauw

. Fibromyalgia. JAMA 2014; 311: 1547.

Spaeth

. Epidemiology, costs, and the economic burden of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: 1117.

Arnold

Clauw

McCarberg

. Improving the recognition and diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86: 457–464.

Steinmetz

Seeher

Schiess

, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23: 344–381.

de Tommaso

. Prevalence, clinical features and potential therapies for fibromyalgia in primary headaches. Expert Rev Neurother 2012; 12: 287–296.

Vincent

Whipple

McAllister

, et al. A cross-sectional assessment of the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions and medication use in a sample of community-dwelling adults with fibromyalgia in olmsted county, Minnesota. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e006681.

Lipton

Bigal

Diamond

, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68: 343–349.

10.

Steiner

Stovner

. Global epidemiology of migraine and its implications for public health and health policy. Nat Rev Neurol 2023; 19: 109–117.

11.

de Tommaso

Federici

Serpino

, et al. Clinical features of headache patients with fibromyalgia comorbidity. J Headache Pain 2011; 12: 629–638.

12.

Penn

I-W

Chuang

T-Y

, et al. Bidirectional association between migraine and fibromyalgia: retrospective cohort analyses of two populations. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e026581.

13.

Küçükşen

Genç

Yılmaz

, et al. The prevalence of fibromyalgia and its relation with headache characteristics in episodic migraine. Clin Rheumatol 2013; 32: 983–990.

14.

Ifergane

Buskila

Simiseshvely

, et al. Prevalence of fibromyalgia syndrome in migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2006; 26: 451–456.

15.

May

Schulte

. Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurolta 2016; 12: 455–464.

16.

Lipton

Buse

Nahas

, et al. Risk factors for migraine disease progression: a narrative review for a patient-centered approach. J Neurol 2023; 270: 5692–5710.

17.

Olesen

. Headache classification committee of the international headache society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia 2018; 38: 1–211.

18.

Wolfe

Clauw

Fitzcharles

M-A

, et al. Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016; 46: 319–329.

19.

Stewart

Lipton

Kolodner

, et al. Validity of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 2000; 88: 41–52.

20.

Zigmond

Snalth

. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. [revista en Internet] 2014 [acceso 28 de noviembre de 2019]; 64(5): 361-370. Acta Psychiatr Scand; 67.

21.

Buysse

Reynolds

Monk

, et al. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28: 193–213.

22.

Wolfe

Clauw

Fitzcharles

, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 1113–1122.

23.

Wolfe

Clauw

Fitzcharles

, et al. The American college of rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 600–610.

24.

Bennett

Friend

Jones

, et al. The revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: 120.

25.

Salaffi

Di Carlo

Arcà

, et al. Categorisation of disease severity states in fibromyalgia: a first step to support decision-making in health care policy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2018; 36: 1074–1081.

26.

Kass

. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat 1980; 29: 119.

27.

Onder

Hamamci

Alpua

, et al. Comorbid fibromyalgia in migraine patients: clinical significance and impact on daily life. Neurol Res 2019; 41: 909–915.

28.

de Tommaso

Federici

Loiacono

, et al. Personality profiles and coping styles in migraine patients with fibromyalgia comorbidity. Compr Psychiatry 2014; 55: 80–86.

29.

Peres

MFP

Young

Kaup

, et al. Fibromyalgia is common in patients with transformed migraine. Neurology 2001; 57: 1326–1328.

30.

Cho

Sohn

Bae

, et al. Fibromyalgia among patients with chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. Headache 2017; 57: 1583–1592.

31.

Penn

Chuang

, et al. Bidirectional association between migraine and fibromyalgia: retrospective cohort analyses of two populations. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e026581.

32.

Wang

S-J

Wang

P-J

Fuh

J-L

, et al. Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: a clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 171–181.

33.

Whealy

Nanda

Vincent

, et al. Fibromyalgia in migraine: a retrospective cohort study. J Headache Pain 2018; 19: 61.

34.

Wolfe

Smythe

Yunus

, et al. The American college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 160–172.

35.

Kleykamp

Ferguson

McNicol

, et al. The prevalence of psychiatric and chronic pain comorbidities in fibromyalgia: an ACTTION systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 51: 166–174.

36.

Weir

Harlan

Nkoy

, et al. The incidence of fibromyalgia and its associated comorbidities. JCR: J Clin Rheumatol 2006; 12: 124–128.

37.

Peres

MFP

Mercante

JPP

Tobo

, et al. Anxiety and depression symptoms and migraine: a symptom-based approach research. J Headache Pain 2017; 18: 37.

38.

Ishii

Schwedt

Dumkrieger

, et al. Chronic versus episodic migraine: the 15-day threshold does not adequately reflect substantial differences in disability across the full spectrum of headache frequency. Headache 2021; 61: 992–1003.

39.

Giamberardino

Affaitati

Martelletti

, et al. Impact of migraine on fibromyalgia symptoms. J Headache Pain 2016; 17: 28.

40.

Liu

H-Y

Fuh

J-L

Lin

Y-Y

, et al. Suicide risk in patients with migraine and comorbid fibromyalgia. Neurology 2015; 85: 1017–1023.

41.

Maixner

Fillingim

Williams

, et al. Overlapping chronic pain conditions: implications for diagnosis and classification. J Pain 2016; 17: T93–T107.

42.

Barad

Sturgeon

Hong

, et al. Characterization of chronic overlapping pain conditions in patients with chronic migraine: a CHOIR study. Headache 2021; 61: 872–881.

43.

Raphael

Marbach

. Widespread pain and the effectiveness of oral splints in myofascial face pain. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 305–316.

44.

Sarchielli

Filippo

Nardi

, et al. Sensitization, glutamate, and the link between migraine and fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2007; 11: 343–351.

45.

Filatova

Latysheva

Kurenkov

. Evidence of persistent central sensitization in chronic headaches: a multi-method study. J Headache Pain 2008; 9: 295–300.

46.

Burstein

Jakubowski

Garcia-Nicas

, et al. Thalamic sensitization transforms localized pain into widespread allodynia. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 81–91.

47.

Pan

L-LH

Wang

Y-F

Lai

K-L

, et al. Mechanical punctate pain threshold is associated with headache frequency and phase in patients with migraine. Cephalalgia 2020; 40: 990–997.

48.

Ceko

Bushnell

Gracely

. Neurobiology underlying fibromyalgia symptoms. Pain Res Treat 2012; 2012: 1–8.

49.

Harte

Harris

Clauw

. The neurobiology of central sensitization. J Appl Biobehav Res 2018; 23: e12137.

50.

Staud

Vierck

Cannon

, et al. Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 2001; 91: 165–175.

51.

Desmeules

Cedraschi

Rapiti

, et al. Neurophysiologic evidence for a central sensitization in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 1420–1429.

52.

Jensen

Loitoile

Kosek

, et al. Patients with fibromyalgia display less functional connectivity in the brain’s pain inhibitory network. Mol Pain 2012; 8: 1744–8069.

53.

Julien

Goffaux

Arsenault

, et al. Widespread pain in fibromyalgia is related to a deficit of endogenous pain inhibition. Pain 2005; 114: 295–302.

54.

Jensen

Kosek

Petzke

, et al. Evidence of dysfunctional pain inhibition in fibromyalgia reflected in rACC during provoked pain. Pain 2009; 144: 95–100.

55.

Assavarittirong

Samborski

Grygiel-Górniak

. Oxidative stress in fibromyalgia: from pathology to treatment. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022; 2022: 1582432.

56.

Peterlin

Rosso

Rapoport

, et al. Obesity and migraine: the effect of age, gender and adipose tissue distribution. Headache 2010; 50: 52–62.

57.

Okifuji

Donaldson

Barck

, et al. Relationship between fibromyalgia and obesity in pain, function, mood, and sleep. J Pain 2010; 11: 1329–1337.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB