Citations and Links as a Measure of Effectiveness of Online LIS Journals

Abstract

Examines the use of citation counts and web links to evaluate online LIS journals. The Journal Impact Factor, a traditional metric for comparing journals, is based on the citation counts of a journal over a specified period of time, compared with the citable articles published in the journal. The Web Impact Factor (WIF) has been proposed as an equivalent metric for websites. The WIF is broadly defined as the ratio of links made to a site, compared to the number of information units (e.g. pages) at the site. The study compares the WIFs of a sample of online LIS journal websites with their conventional citation counts. Links to online journals are often considered to be equivalent to citations, but there are significant differences. Provides indications of how effective the online medium is for communicating LIS research and offers guidance for LIS authors and journal editors to help them make effective use of online journals.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

An, L. and Qiu, J. (2003) Research on the relationships between Chinese journal impact factors and web impact factors and external web link counts . Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 22 (4), 398–402 .

Bar-Ilan, J. (2001) How much information the search engines disclose on the links to a web page? – A case study of the Cybermetrics home page. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Sydney 16–20 July 2001. Sydney: Bibliometric and Informetric Research Group, UNSW . pp. 63–73.

Bar-Ilan, J. , Peritza, B.C. and Wolman, Y. (2003) A survey on the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the web by the academic staff of Israeli universities . Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29 (6), 346–361 .

Casserly, M. and Bird, J. (2003) Web citation availability: analysis and implications for scholarship . College and Research Libraries, 64 (4), 300–317 .

Chu, H. (2003) Reasons for sitation (hyperlinking): what do they imply for webometric research? Paper presented at the International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 9th. 25–29 August 2003, Beijing.

Harter, S. P. and Ford, C. E. (2000) Web–based analyses of e-journal impact: approaches, problems, and issues . JASIS, 51 (3), 1159–1176 .

Hawkins, D.T. (2001) Bibliometrics of electronic journals in information science . Information Research, 7 (1). http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper120.html

Herring, S.D. (2002) Use of electronic resources in scholarly electronic journals: a citation analysis . College and Research Libraries, 63 (4), 334–340 .

Ingwersen, P. (1998) Web Impact Factors . Journal of Documentation, 54 (2), 236–243 .

10.

Kim, H.J. (2000) Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: a qualitative study . Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (10), 887–899 .

11.

Koehler, W. , Aguilar, P. and Finarelli, S. (2000) A biblio-metric analysis of select information science print and electronic journals in the 1990s . Information Research, 6 (1). http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper88.html

12.

Lawrence, S. (2001) Online or invisible? Nature, 411 (6837), 521-521 .

13.

Marek, K. and Valauskas, E.J. (2002) Web logs as indices of electronic journal use: tools for identifying a ‘classic’ article . Libri, 52 (4), 220–230 .

14.

Oppenheim, C. and Smith, R. (2001) Student citation practices in an information science department . Education for Information, 19 (4), 299–323 .

15.

Prime, C. , Bassecoulard, E. and Zitt, M. (2002) Cocitations and co-sitations: a cautionary view on an analogy . Scientometrics, 54 (2), 291–308 .

16.

Rousseau, R. (2002) Journal evaluation: technical and practical issues . Library Trends, 50 (3), 418–418 .

17.

Shin, E.-J. (2003) Do Impact Factors change with a change of medium? A comparison of Impact Factors when publication is by paper and through parallel publishing . Journal of Information Science, 29 (6), 527–533 .

18.

Smith, A.G. (2003) Classifying links for substantive Web Impact Factors . Paper presented at the ISSI 2003, Beijing. pp. 305–311 .

19.

Thelwall, M. (2003) What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation . Information Research, 8 (3 paper no. 151). http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper151.html

20.

Vaughan, L. and Hysen, K. (2002) Relationship between links to journal Web sites and impact factors . Aslib Proceedings, 54 (6), 356–361 .

21.

Vaughan, L. and Shaw, D. (2003) Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (14), 1313–1322 .

22.

Vaughan, L. and Thelwall, M. (2003) Scholarly use of the Web: what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? JASIS, 54 (1), 29–38 .

23.

Wilkinson, D. , Harries, G. , Thelwall, M. and Price, L. (2003) Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication . Journal of Information Science, 29 (1), 49–56 .