Assessing disability inclusivity in UAE university libraries: A regulatory and empirical perspective

Abstract

The study examines the current state of compliance with existing local and international disability laws and the level of inclusivity practices in university libraries across the United Arab Emirates, focusing on digital and physical accessibility, policy compliance, staff competence, and the challenges associated with it. The study employs a quantitative approach, utilizing a structured survey that involves 68 library professionals from university libraries across the UAE. The study's findings suggest that university libraries in the UAE demonstrate strong compliance with both national and international disability laws. The libraries scored high in physical accessibility features such as elevators and ramps (M = 4.16, SD = 0.84), accessible parking (M = 4.19, SD = 0.82), and restrooms (M = 4.00, SD = 0.96), indicating that more than 80% libraries showed compliance. However, several gaps were also identified in the area related to the provision of alternative formats for users with sensory disabilities and designated spaces for special needs users. Digital accessibility showed moderate advancement with an average mean score of 3.63 and 72.6% compliance observed with the presence of accessible digital content and platforms, but inconsistent availability of assistive tools and technologies for users. The study also found that there is a moderate level, with an average mean score of 3.44 and 68.8% of competency level among library and information science professionals observed while serving users with disabilities. The most significant challenge was the shortage of specialized staff, and there was a need for specialized training to cater to the needs of users with disabilities, while funding was at a moderate level. Other challenges identified included problems related to outreach and collaboration, and a lack of awareness among users about disability related library services. The findings of this study have implications for policymakers, librarians, and education administrators as they can identify the key gaps and address them. Regular policy reviews, increased investment in assistive technologies, enhanced collaboration with special needs organizations, and systematic staff development can ensure inclusive services and provide better services to users with disabilities.

Keywords

Assistive technologies digital accessibility disability inclusion disability legislation library accessibility library services for people with disabilities special needs university libraries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdelrahman

(2016) Use of library technology and services by the visually-impaired and the blind in the university of Khartoum, Sudan. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 36(2): 93–97.

Alhammadi

(2016) Educational rights for learners with vision impairment in UAE higher education institutions: Addressing the gap between Federal Law No. (29), 2006, and the reality of practice. British Journal of Visual Impairment 34(2): 156–166.

Al-Harrasi

Taha

(2019) Networked library access and services delivery for the blind and visually impaired university students: Evidence from the UAE. Information Discovery and Delivery 47(3): 117–124.

Ali

Khusro

Alahmadi

(2024) Accessible interactive learning of mathematical expressions for school students with visual disabilities. PeerJ Computer Science 10: e2599.

Ali

MASM

Ali Al-Ajami

(2021) Academic library services for individuals with mobility disabilities in Kuwait. Journal of Faculty of Education—Assiut University 37(7): 21–60.

Al-Mansour

(2010) Developing Accessibility for Persons with Disability in Public Places and Transport. Available at: https://trid.trb.org/view/1127307

Alqodsi

Aljahoori

(2023) Legal protection of the right to education for people with special needs. In: Efthymiou E (ed.) Inclusive Phygital Learning Approaches and Strategies for Students With Special Needs. London: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, pp.199–213. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8504-0.ch010 .

Alu

King

(2024) Disability policies to guide the provision of facilities, services, and resources to students with disabilities: The case of ten Ghanaian academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 50(6): 102970.

Ariya

Yensathit

Thongthip

, et al. (2024) Assisting hearing and physically impaired students in navigating immersive virtual reality for library orientation. Technologies 13(1): 2.

10.

Atha Difa

Ridwan

(2023) Disability justice and libraries: An Indonesian experience. Knowledge Garden 1(1): 57–72.

11.

Atkinson

Dhiensa

(2007) Improving library services to people with print disabilities: The role of technology in public libraries. In: Deines-Jones C (ed.) Improving Library Services to People with Disabilities. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp.1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-286-1.50001-8

12.

Bonk

Nurdiani

Katarina

(2021) The application of accessibility in public library building design in Jakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 794(1): 012163.

13.

Camulli

Guohui

(2019) The employment continuum: A framework for hiring people with disabilities in Dubai, UAE. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research: 56–75. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1936 .

14.

Cassner

Maxey-Harris

Anaya

(2011) Differently able: A review of academic library websites for people with disabilities. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 30(1): 33–51.

15.

Chauhan

SPS

(2024) Enhancing Accessibility in Special Libraries: A Study on AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Patrons with Disabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06970.

16.

Clark

(2020) A coordinated effort: Cultural and policy requirements for digital accessibility. College & Undergraduate Libraries 27(2–4): 265–280.

17.

de Perio Wittman

(2023) Moving beyond the basics of the ADA and section 504: Opportunities for equitable and inclusive access to law libraries, collections, and services. Legal Reference Services Quarterly 42(3–4): 272–298.

18.

Doerr

(1994) Compliance. Public Library Quarterly 14(1): 25–28.

19.

Echeverría

Finotelli

(2024) Inclusion and exclusion. In: Sciortino G, Cvajner M and Kivisto PJ (eds) Research Handbook on the Sociology of Migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.156–166. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105463.00020

20.

Eneya

Adesina

(2025) Library service provision for students with disabilities in academic libraries: A literature review. In: Ocholla D, Onyancha OB and Adesina AO (eds) Information, Knowledge, and Technology for Teaching and Research in Africa. London: Springer, pp.85–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65745-0_4

21.

Falloon

(2015) A case study in practice: Providing accessibility for persons with disabilities at the college of staten island library. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.89–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065283020150000040014

22.

Foley

Ferri

(2012) Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 12(4): 192–200.

23.

Frank

(2023) Improving library accessibility webpages with secondary feedback from users with disabilities. Journal of Web Librarianship 17(3): 59–70.

24.

Frank J, Salsbury M, McKelvey H, et al. (2021) Digital equity & inclusion strategies for libraries. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion 5(3): 185–205.

25.

Gaad

(2017) Three birds with one stone: Empower, include, and sustain the Emirati community program; kayani. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies 12(1): 1–13.

26.

Grassi

(2018) Building inclusive communities: Teens with disabilities in libraries. Reference Services Review 46(3): 364–378.

27.

Green

(2009) Assistive technology and academic libraries: Legal issues and problem resolution. Journal of Access Services 6(1–2): 36–47.

28.

Green

Blair

(2011) Keep It Simple: A Guide to Assistive Technologies. Bloomsbury.

29.

Hamamy

(2013) Community genetic services in Arab countries. Middle East Journal of Medical Genetics 2(1): 6–10.

30.

Jaeger

Wentz

Bertot

(2015) Accessibility, inclusion, and the roles of libraries. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries, London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. pp.1–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020150000040008

31.

Jasmin

(2024) Training for academic librarians in assistive technologies (AT) requires higher priority and targeted funding. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 19(1): 138–140.

32.

Kulikauskienė

Liukinevičienė

(2020) Legal and administrative environment of inclusive libraries for people with disabilities in Lithuania. Informacijos Mokslai 88: 120–141.

33.

Maddisetty

(2024) Robotic library services in the context of persons with disabilities. Annals of Library and Information Studies 71(02). https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v71i2.7545 .

34.

Mahmood

Ruffing

Ilozumba

, et al. (2024) Bridging the gap: Challenges and opportunities of assistive technology loan library systems for individuals with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 20(3): 611–620.

35.

Marcaccio

Clarke

Wetheral

(2022) Learning about real experiences from real users: A blueprint for participatory accessibility testing. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 17(1): 1–21.

36.

Marte

Vanderheiden

(2025) Improving assistive technology access for library computing. In: Baker D and Ellis L (eds) Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp.561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95689-5.00200-5

37.

Marwiyah

Zain

Chasanawati

, et al. (2024) Accessibility of UIN Sunan Kalijaga library for students with disabilities: An evaluation. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings 9: 157–173.

38.

Matsumura

Ochiai

(2023) A comparison of digital libraries for the visually impaired in the United States and Japan. In: Stephanidis C, Antona M, Ntoa S, et al. (eds) HCI International 2023 Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1833.London: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35992-7_47

39.

Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MOHESR) . (2024) Open data: HE Institutions. Available at: https://www.mohesr.gov.ae/En/OpenData/Pages/home.aspx (accessed 15 April 2025).

40.

Morgan

(2021) The experiences of disabled people in the United Arab Emirates: Barriers to participation in higher education and employment. Disability & Society 38(3): 421–444.

41.

Mountapmbeme

Okafor

Ludi

(2022) Accessible blockly: An accessible block-based programming library for people with visual impairments. In: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544806

42.

Nandi A and Mohapatra PK (2005) Extending library facilities to physically challenged-case of IIT Kharagpur. ICMIT 2005: 54.

43.

Nazim

Beg

Sarkar

(2021) Access to library facilities and services for users with disabilities: A study of Aligarh Muslim University in India. Journal of Access Services 18(1): 30–49.

44.

Odigie

Okube

(2021) The place of assistive technologies in the service delivery of special need users in academic libraries of Kogi state. Library Philosophy and Practice(e-Journal) 6076. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6076.

45.

Onchagwa

Wambiri

(2022) Strategies for implementation of disability mainstreaming policies in public libraries, in reference to Kenya national libraries, Meru, Kisumu, and Nakuru branches. International Journal of Current Aspects 6(1): 111–124.

46.

Ostergaard

(2015) Accessibility from scratch: One library’s journey to prioritize the accessibility of electronic information resources. The Serials Librarian 69(2): 155–168.

47.

Oswal

(2020) Institutional, legal, and attitudinal barriers to the accessibility of university digital libraries: Implications for retention of disabled students. In: Management Association I (ed.) Digital Libraries and Institutional Repositories. London: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, pp.123–141. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2463-3.ch009

48.

Patel

Brown

(2017) An overview of the conceptual framework and definitions of disability. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development 10(3): 247–252.

49.

Phukubje

Ngoepe

(2016) Convenience and accessibility of library services to students with disabilities at the university of Limpopo in South Africa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 49(2): 180–190.

50.

Pineda

(2019) Laws, rights, and norms. In: Pineda VS (ed.) Building the Inclusive City. London: Palgrave Pivot, pp.115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32988-4_6

51.

Pionke JJ (2017) Beyond ADA compliance: The library as a place for all. Urban Library Journal 23(1): 3.

52.

Pomputius

(2020) Assistive technology and software to support accessibility. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 39(2): 203–210.

53.

Potnis

Mallary

(2021) Analyzing service divide in academic libraries for better serving disabled patrons using assistive technologies. College & Research Libraries 82(6). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.6.879 .

54.

Samson

(2011) Best practices for serving students with disabilities. Reference Services Review 39(2): 260–277.

55.

Schalock

Borthwick-Duffy

Bradley

, et al. (2010) Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

56.

Schulze

Berget

(2024) Inclusive public libraries: how to adequately identify accessibility barriers? Universal Design 2024: Shaping a Sustainable, Equitable and Resilient Future for All. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti240995

57.

Shouaib

Alabdouli

(2023) The rights of persons with disabilities in the United Arab Emirates in the light of national and international legislation. Arab Law Quarterly 39(1–2): 168–190.

58.

Small

Myhill

Herring-Harrington

(2015) Developing accessible libraries and inclusive librarians in the 21st century: Examples from practice. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.73–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020150000040013

59.

Tatomir

(2012) Collection accessibility: A best practices guide for libraries and librarians. Library Technology Reports 48: 36.

60.

Timony

(2015) Accessibility and the maker movement: A case study of the adaptive technology program at district of Columbia public library. In: Wentz B, Jaeger PT and Bertot JC (eds) Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.51–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0065-283020150000040011

61.

Tiurkedzhy

Davydova

Marina

, et al. (2022) Accessibility analysis of digital libraries and specialized library resources. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings 7: 218–231.

62.

Tripathi

Shukla

(2014) Use of assistive technologies in academic libraries: A survey. Assistive Technology 26(2): 105–118.

63.

U.AE (2025) Protecting the rights of people of determination (persons with disabilities). Available at: https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/human-rights-in-the-uae/protecting-the-rights-of-people-of-determination (accessed 10/03/2025).

64.

UNESCO (2023) Inclusion in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/inclusion-education (accessed 06/08/2025).

65.

Vandenbark

(2010) Tending a wild garden: Library web design for persons with disabilities. Information Technology and Libraries 29(1): 23–29.

66.

Wentz

Jaeger

Lazar

(2011) Retrofitting accessibility: The legal inequality of after-the-fact online access for persons with disabilities in the United States. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i11.3666.

67.

Willis

O’Reilly

(2018) Enhancing visibility of vendor accessibility documentation. Information Technology and Libraries 37(3): 12–28.

68.

Yoon

(2020) A study on the main body and content of state-led library service for persons with disabilities by continent. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 51(3): 1–25.

69.

Yoon

Kim

(2016) A study of collection development policy to strengthen South Korea’s library services for persons with disabilities/Une étude des politiques de développement des collections pour renforcer les services en bibliothèque pour personnes handicapées en Corée du Sud. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 40(2): 162–185.