Smooth-Switching Control-Based Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control by Considering Dynamic Information Flow Topology

Abstract

Vehicle-to-vehicle communications can be unreliable because of interference and information congestion, which leads to the dynamic information flow topology (IFT) in a platoon of connected and autonomous vehicles. Some existing studies adaptively switch the controller of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) to optimize string stability when IFT varies. However, the difference of transient response between controllers can induce uncomfortable jerks at switching instances, significantly affecting riding comfort and jeopardizing vehicle powertrain. To improve riding comfort while maintaining string stability, the authors introduce a smooth-switching control-based CACC scheme with IFT optimization (CACC-SOIFT) by implementing a bi-layer optimization model and a Kalman predictor. The first optimization layer balances the probability of communication failure and control performance optimally, generating a robust IFT to reduce controller switching. The second optimization layer adjusts the controller parameters to minimize tracking error and the undesired jerk. Further, a Kalman predictor is applied to predict vehicle acceleration if communication failures occur. It is also used to estimate the states of preceding vehicles to suppress the measurement noise and the acceleration disturbance. The effectiveness of the proposed CACC-SOIFT is validated through numerical experiments based on NGSIM field data. Results indicate that the CACC-SOIFT framework can guarantee string stability and riding comfort in the environment of dynamic IFT.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Horowitz

Varaiya

Control Design of an Automated Highway System. Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 88, No. 7, 2000, pp. 913–925.

Xiao

Wang

Schakel

van Arem

Unravelling Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Deactivation on Traffic Flow Characteristics at Merging Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 96, 2018, pp. 380–397.

McAuliffe

Lammert

X. Y.

Shladover

Surcel

M. D.

Kailas

Influences on Energy Savings of Heavy Trucks Using Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. SAE Technical Paper No. 2018-01-1181. Society of Automotive Engineers, Detroit, 2018.

Naus

Vugts

Ploeg

Molengraft

Steinbuch

String-Stable CACC Design and Experimental Validation: A Frequency-Domain Approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 59, No. 9, 2010, pp. 4268–4279.

Kim

Y. H.

Peeta

Modeling the Information Flow Propagation Wave Under Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 85, 2017, pp. 377–395.

Wang

Kim

Y. H.

Peeta

Analytical Model for Information Flow Propagation Wave Under an Information Relay Control Strategy in a Congested Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 23, 2017, pp. 738–757.

S. E.

Zheng

Wang

An Overview of Vehicular Platoon Control Under the Four-Component Framework. Proc., 26th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Seoul, South Korea, 2015, pp. 286–291.

Gao

S. E.

Sun

Distributed Sliding Mode Control of Vehicular Platoon with Uncertain Interaction Topology. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 8: pp. 6351–6361.

Gong

Zhou

Peeta

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for a Platoon of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Considering Dynamic Information Flow Topology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 185–198.

10.

Wang

Gong

Zhou

Peeta

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for Connected Autonomous Vehicles by Factoring Communication-Related Constraints. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 38, 2019, pp. 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.010.

11.

Cheong

Safonov

Bumpless Transfer for Adaptive Switching Controls. IFAC Proceedings, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2008, pp. 14415–14420.

12.

Zhou

Ahn

Chitturi

Noyce

D. A.

Rolling Horizon Stochastic Optimal Control Strategy for ACC and CACC Under Uncertainty. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 83, 2017, pp. 61–76.

13.

Ploeg

Semsar-Kazerooni

Lijster

van de Wouw

Nijmeijer

Graceful Degeneration of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015, pp. 488–497.

14.

Zheng

S. E.

Ren

Platooning with Connected Vehicles with Undirected Topologies: Robustness Analysis and Distributed H-Infinity Controller Synthesis. IEEE Transaction Intelligent Transportation System, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2018, pp. 1353–1364.

15.

Qiu

H. J.

I. W.H.

Chi

K. T.

A Stochastic Traffic Modeling Approach for 802.11 p VANET Broadcasting Performance Evaluation. Proc., 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Montreal, Canada, 2012, pp. 1077–1083.

16.

Qiu

H. J.

I. W.H.

Chi

K. T.

Xie

A Methodology for Studying 802.11 p VANET Broadcasting Performance with Practical Vehicle Distribution. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 64, No. 10, 2015, pp. 4756–4769.

17.

Wang

Ouyang

Prediction and Field Validation of Traffic Oscillation Propagation Under Nonlinear Car-Following Laws. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2012, pp. 409–423.

18.

Peng

Ouyang

Measurement and Estimation of Traffic Oscillation Properties. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2010, pp. 1–14.

19.

Next Generation Simulation. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/ngsim.htm. Accessed April 12, 2018.

20.

Hoberock

A Survey of Longitudinal Acceleration Comfort Studies in Ground Transportation Vehicles. Journal of Dynamical Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 99, No. 2, 1977, pp. 76–84.