Gravity load paths of high-skew bridges differ from the ones with no skew. High skew can also lead to stresses or displacements that adversely affect service performance. This paper demonstrates the effects of skew on bridges through finite element analyses, bridge inspections, and statistical analyses. Five deck-girder type bridges with and without skew were inspected. A database of more than 1,400 deck-girder type bridges was analyzed to seek relationships between skew and National Bridge Inventory (NBI) ratings. Practices of Departments of Transportation (DOT) were compared with each other and to provisions of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (BDS). Acute deck corner cracking and bridge movements were documented on some high-skew bridges. Field inspections and database analyses showed that not all high-skew bridges have performance issues, and NBI ratings are in general not sensitive to skew. This is likely because of many factors affecting performance and certain details mitigating skew effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Diaz ArancibiaM.OkumusP.OlivaM.Review of Skew Effects on Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridges: Problems and Current Practices. Proc., PCI Convention and National Bridge Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, 2017, Vol. 50, p.18.
2.
WhiteD. W.ColettiD.ChavelB. W.SanchezA.OzgurC.ChongJ. M. J.LeonR. T.MedlockR. D.CisnerosR. A.GalambosT. V.YadloskyJ. M.GattiW. J.KowatchG. T.NCHRP Report 725: Guidelines for Analysis Methods and Construction Engineering of Curved and Skewed Steel Girder Bridges. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012.
3.
Diaz ArancibiaM.Design and Performance of Highly Skewed Deck Girder Bridges, Ph.D. thesis, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, N.Y., 2018.
American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th ed.AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2017.
6.
FuC. C.WangS.Computational Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2015.
7.
FuG.FengJ.DimariaJ.ZhuangY.Bridge Deck Corner Cracking on Skewed Structures. Research Report RC-1490. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State University, 2007.
Bou DiabF.MabsoutM.TarhiniK.Influence of Skew Angle on Live Load Moments in Steel Girder Bridges. Bridge Structures Journal, Vol. 7, 2011, pp. 151–163.
10.
EbeidoT.KennedyJ. B.Girder Moments in Continuous Skew Composite Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 37–45.
11.
EbeidoT.KennedyJ. B.Girder Moments in Simply Supported Skew Composite Bridges. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 904–916.
12.
NuttR. V.SchamberR. A.ZokaieT.NCHRP Report 12-26: Distribution of Wheel Loads on Highway Bridges. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1988.
13.
EbeidoT.KennedyJ. B.Shear Distribution in Simply Supported Skew Composite Bridges. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, 1995, pp. 1143–1154.
14.
EbeidoT.KennedyJ. B.Shear and Reaction Distributions in Continuous Skew Composite Bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 155–165.
15.
Modjeski and Masters Inc. NCHRP Project Report 20-7/Task 107: Shear in Skewed Multi-Beam Bridges. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
16.
BurkeM. P.Integral and Semi-integral Bridges. Wiley, West Sussex, 2009.
17.
ColettiD.ChavelB.GattiW.Challenges of Skew in Bridges with Steel Girders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2251: 47–56.
18.
MoortyS.RoederC. W.Temperature-Dependent Bridge Movements. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, 1992, pp. 1090–1105.
19.
TindalT. T.YooC. H.Thermal Effects on Skewed Steel Highway Bridges and Bearing Orientation. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 8, 2003, pp. 57–65.
20.
Diaz ArancibiaM.OkumusP.Load Testing of Highly Skewed Concrete Bridges. ACI Special Publication, SP-323: Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Behavior through Load Testing-International Perspectives, Vol. 2, 2018, No. 1–2, pp.18.
21.
Bridge Manual, ed., with 2015 rev.Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), 2015.
22.
LarsonT. D.CadyP. D.PriceJ. T.Review of a Three-Year Bridge Deck Study in Pennsylvania. Highway Research Record: Highway Research Board, 1968, pp. 11–25.
23.
MokaremD. W.RussellH.KhanM.High Performance Concrete Bridge Deck Investigation. Publication FHWA-HRT-10-028. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2009.
24.
StringerD. J.BurgueñoR.Identification of Causes and Solution Strategies for Deck Cracking in Jointless Bridges. Report RC-1571. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 2012.
25.
KraussP. D.RogallaE. A.NCHRP Report 380: Transverse Cracking in Newly Constructed Bridge Decks. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.
26.
SchmittT. R.DarwinD.Cracking in Concrete Bridge Decks. Report K-TRAN: KU-94-1. Kansas Department of Transportation, 1995.
27.
SaadeghvaziriM. A.HadidiR.Cause and Control of Transverse Cracking in Concrete Bridge Decks. Publication FHWA-NJ-2002-019. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2002.
28.
SonntagS.YoergerG.Inspection Report for B-13-513 Old Middleton Road over Wisconsin & Southern RR. Inspection Report B-13-513. Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 2014.
29.
Fédération Internationale du Béton – International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). FIB Model Code for Concrete Structures, 2010.
30.
SIMULIA - Dassault Systèmes. Abaqus 6.16. [Computer software], Version 6.16-1.
31.
KimY. J.YoonD. K.Identifying Critical Sources of Bridge Deterioration in Cold Regions Through the Constructed Bridges in North Dakota. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 15, 2010, pp. 542–552.
32.
MoomenM.QiaoY.AgbelieB. R.LabiS.SinhaK. C.Bridge Deterioration Models to Support Indiana’s Bridge Management System. Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2016/03. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2016.
33.
AgrawalA. K.KawaguchiA.ChenZ.Bridge Element Deterioration Rates. Project Report No C-01-51. New York State Department of Transportation, 2009.
34.
NasrollahiM.WasherG.Estimating Inspection Intervals for Bridges Based on Statistical Analysis of National Bridge Inventory Data. Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 20, 2014, p. 04014104.
35.
MorcousG.RivardH.HannaA.Modeling Bridge Deterioration Using Case-Based Reasoning. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 8, 2002, pp. 86–95.
36.
BalakumaranS. S. G.WeyersR. E.BrownM. C.Linear Cracking in Bridge Decks. Publication FHWA/VTRC 18-R13. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2018.
37.
Contreras-NietoC.LewisP.ShanY.Developing Predictive Models of Superstructure Ratings for Steel and Prestressed Concrete Bridges. Proc., Construction Research Congress, 2016, pp. 859–868.
38.
JonnalagaddaS.RossB. E.KhademiA.A Modelling Approach for Evaluating the Effects of Design Variables on Bridge Condition Ratings. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, Vol. 1, 2016, pp. 167–176.
39.
Federal Highway Administration. Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges. Publication FHWA-PD-96-001. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1995.
40.
PuckettJ. A.MertzD. R.HuoX. S.JablinM.C.PeavyM. D.PatrickM. D.NCHRP Report 12-62: Simplified Live Load Distribution Factor Equations. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
41.
Bridge Manual, 4th ed., with 2014 rev. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), 2006.
42.
Bridge Design Manual, ed., with 2011 rev. Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), 2003.
43.
LRFD Bridge Design Manual, ed., with 2015 rev. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), 2003.
44.
Bridge Design Manual, ed., with July2015 rev. Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2007.
45.
Bridge Design Manual, ed., with July2015 rev. Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), 2015.
46.
VTrans Structures Design Manual, ed., with July2015 rev. Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans), 2010.
47.
LRFD Bridge Manual, ed., with 2013 rev. Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), 2013.
48.
Design Manual for Bridges and Structures, 5th ed.New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT), 2009.
49.
Design Manual, ed., with May2014 rev. Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), 2013.
50.
Bridge Design Manual, ed., with 2015 rev. New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT), 2015.
51.
Bridge Design Guide, ed., with 2014 rev. Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), 2003.
52.
Bridge Manual, ed., with June2015 rev. Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), 2012.
53.
Design Manual, Part 4: Structures, Ed. with April2015 rev. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), 2015.
54.
LRFD Bridge Design Manual, ed., 2007. State of Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT), 2007.
55.
Bridge Design Manual-LRFD, ed., with March2013 rev. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), 2013.
56.
Bridge Design Manual, ed., with April2015 rev. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), 2015.
