Influence of Asphalt Emulsion Formulation Parameters on the Fluidity of Cement Asphalt Mortar for High-Speed Rail Tracks

Abstract

The objective of the present study is twofold: firstly, to evaluate the influence of asphalt emulsion properties on the fluidity characteristics of cement asphalt mortar (CAM) for high-speed railway (HSR) track systems; and secondly, to propose a testing protocol that effectively differentiates the asphalt emulsions suitable for CAM with respect to fluidity requirement, considering specific requirements for the application. The study involved assessing CAM fluidity under various emulsion formulation variables, including the pH, residual asphalt content, and emulsifier dosage. In addition, three different test methods were evaluated for their suitability as the protocol for asphalt emulsions evaluation for CAM production in HSR applications. The results showed that the pH of the asphalt emulsion significantly affects the fluidity of the CAM, with cationic emulsions demonstrating less stability because of high alkaline conditions of CAM, while anionic/non-ionic emulsions exhibited stable fluidity. Fluidity in CAM is observed when an asphalt emulsion possesses an optimal micelle concentration, which effectively resists coagulation. The findings emphasize the importance of considering both upper and lower limits for residual asphalt content in emulsion specifications for CAM production. Emulsifier dosage also played a role, with high emulsifier dosages leading to high fluidity in CAM. The study introduced a fluidity ratio test as a suitable method for selecting asphalt emulsions for CAM production for HSR track systems.

Keywords

infrastructure emulsified asphalt rail high-speed Shinkansen ballastless

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Esveld

Recent Developments in Slab Track. European Railway Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp. 81–85.

Ando

Sunaga

Aoki

Haga

Development of Slab Tracks for Hokuriku Shinkansen Line. Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan), Vol. 42, No. 1, 2001, pp. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.42.35.

Pires

Dumont

A.-G.

Railway Ballast Degradation. Proc., STRC, 15th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verità, Ascona, April 15–17, 2015.

Tan

Ouyang

Effect of Emulsifier on Cement Hydration in Cement Asphalt Mortar. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47, 2013, pp. 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.044.

Department of Science and Technology_Ministry of Railways. Tentative Specifications for Cement-Emulsified Asphalt Mortars Used in CRTS II Ballastless Slab Tracks of Passenger Dedicated Lines. Beijing, P. R. China, 2008.

Asphalt Cold Mix Manual MS-14. Asphalt Institute. Lexington, KY, 1990.

C. T.

Kuo

M. F.

Shen

D. H.

Composition and Reaction Mechanism of Cement–Asphalt Mastic. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2580–2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.02.014.

Fang

Garcia-hernandez

Lura

Overview on Cold Cement Bitumen Emulsion Asphalt. RILEM Technical Letters, Vol. 1, 2016, pp. 116–121. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.23.

Banapuram

R. R.

Kuna

K. K.

Amarnatha Reddy

Influence of Feeding Sequence on the Fluidity and Fluidity Time of Cement Asphalt Mortar for High-Speed Rail Slab Track. In Transportation Research. TPMDC 2022 ( D.

Singh

Maji

Karmarkar

Gupta

Velaga

N. R.

Debbarma

, eds.), Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol. 434, Springer, Singapore, 2024, pp. 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6090-3_15.

10.

SABITA. Technical Guideline: Bitumen Stabilised Materials (TG-2). Southern African Bitumen Association, South Africa, 2020.

11.

AASHTOT59. Standard Method of Test for Emulsified Asphalts. Vol. 36, No. 2, Americal Association of State Highway and transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2016, pp. 1–14.

12.

BS EN 12848:2009: Bitumen and Bituminous Binders — Determination of Mixing Stability with Cement of Bituminous Emulsions. British Standards Institution, London, 2009.

13.

IS8887. Bitumen Emulsion for Roads (Cationic Type)-Specification (Third Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 2018.

14.

Wilkinson

McNaught

A. D.

Compendium of Chemical Terminology. IUPAC, North Carolina, USA, 1997.

15.

Querol

Barreneche

Cabeza

L. F.

Storage Stability of Bimodal Emulsions vs. Monomodal Emulsions. Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 12, 2017, p. 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP7121267.

16.

Marhamati

Ranjbar

Rezaie

Effects of Emulsifiers on the Physicochemical Stability of Oil-in-Water Nanoemulsions: A Critical Review. Journal of Molecular Liquids, Vol. 340, 2021, P. 117218. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2021.117218.

17.

Kazemi Esfeh

Ghanavati

Shojaei Arani

The Factors Affecting on Bitumen Emulsion Properties. Proc., ICCCE 2010 - 2010 International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. IEEE Xplore, 2010, pp. 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCENG.2010.5560360.

18.

Fang

Zhou

Yang

Yuan

Que

Interaction Between Cement and Asphalt Emulsion and Its Influences on Asphalt Emulsion Demulsification, Cement Hydration and Rheology. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 329, 2022, P. 127220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127220.

19.

Investigation of the Interaction Between Cement and Asphalt Emulsion and Its Mechanism. Southeast University, 2018.

20.

Ouyang

Tan

Zhao

Demulsification Process of Asphalt Emulsion in Fresh Cement-Asphalt Emulsion Paste. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, Vol. 48, No. 12, 2015, pp. 3875–3883. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0446-9.

21.

Huang

Y. H.

Pavement Analysis and Design. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2004.

22.

Indian Standards. IS 3117: Bitumen Emulsion for Roads and Allied Applications (Anionic Type). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 2004.