Can Geopolymer Be a Replacement for Portland Cement in Full-Depth Reclamation Projects? Short- and Long-Term Performance Analysis

Abstract

The fundamental concern of the full-depth reclamation (FDR) technique using Portland cement (FDR-PC) lies in its detrimental effect on the environment. Therefore, researchers are exploring alternative binders that are comparatively greener but compatible with FDR. This study evaluates both the strength and durability aspects of FDR incorporating geopolymer binder (FDR-GP) as an alternative to conventional FDR-PC. Various blends of fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) have been experimented with as geopolymer pre-cursors, ensuring that the additive content does not exceed 20% by weight of the total mix. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was utilized for the alkalinization in varying molarities to enhance the performance of the mixes. The experimental design was formulated to achieve a target 7-day unconfined compressive strength (UCS) strength of 4.95 MPa. This was obtained at a lower molarity (M) of 2 M and a 70% FA, 30% GGBS binder content. The mixes performed satisfactorily in both compression and flexure, along with excellent durability properties analyzed through wetting and drying tests. Furthermore, the long-term performance of FDR-GP mixes was investigated with regard to both UCS and flexural strength after 56, 161, and 238 days of curing. Thereafter, a comprehensive microstructural analysis was conducted to understand the fundamental changes in the matrix that influence mix performance. The outcome of this research confirms the potential of using FA/GGBS-based geopolymer as an alternative binder in FDR projects of flexible pavement, the mechanical and durability properties of which adequately satisfy the requirements as stipulated in various design standards.

Keywords

geomaterials full depth reclamation geopolymer durability long term performance sustainable pavements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fedrigo

Núñez

W. P.

Visser

A. T.

A Review of Full-Depth Reclamation of Pavements with Portland Cement: Brazil and Abroad. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 262, 2020, p. 120540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120540.

Luhr

Full-Depth Reclamation: Recycling Roads Saves Money and Natural Resources. Public Works, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2005, pp. 115–117.

Reeder

G. D.

Harrington

D. S.

Ayers

M. E.

Adaska

Guide to Full-Depth Reclamation with Cement. Portland Cement Association, 2017.

Wirtgen

GmbH

. Wirtgen Cold Recycling Technology. Wirtgen Group Company, 2012, p. 367.

Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA). Basic Asphalt Recycling Manual, 2nd ed, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, 2015.

Gupta

Mohapatra

B. N.

Bansal

A Review on Development of Portland Limestone Cement: A Step towards Low Carbon Economy for Indian Cement Industry. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, Vol. 3, 2020, p. 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100019.

Damtoft

J. S.

Lukasik

Herfort

Sorrentino

Gartner

E. M.

Sustainable Development and Climate Change Initiatives. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, pp. 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008.

Ashfaq

Moghal

A. A. B.

Cost and Carbon Footprint Analysis of Flyash Utilization in Earthworks. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2022, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00364-4.

Amulya

Moghal

A. A. B.

Almajed

Sustainable Binary Blending for Low-Volume Roads—Reliability-Based Design Approach and Carbon Footprint Analysis. Materials, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2023, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052065.

10.

MolaAbasi

Ataee

Mirsadeghi

M. N.

Masrour

F. F.

Marani

Nehdi

M. L.

Investigation of High Plasticity Clay Stabilized with Cement and Zeolite Using Time-Dependent Pressure Wave Velocity. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2024, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-16964.

11.

Amlashi

S. M. H.

Vaillancourt

Carter

Bilodeau

J. P.

Najafi

E. K.

Rahbar-Rastegar

Mechanical Properties of Unbound Limestone Aggregates Replaced by Recycled Glass Aggregate for Pavement in Canada/Quebec. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2024, pp. 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0158.

12.

Davidovits

Geopolymers - Inorganic Polymeric New Materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, Vol. 37, No. 8, 1991, pp. 1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193.

13.

Wang

Liu

Zhu

Wang

Nehdi

M. L.

Modulation of the Workability and Ca/Si/Al Ratio of Cement-Metakaolin Cementitious Material System by Using Fly Ash: Synergistic Effect and Hydration Products. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 404, 2023, p. 133300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133300.

14.

Avirneni

Peddinti

P. R. T.

Saride

Durability and Long Term Performance of Geopolymer Stabilized Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Base Courses. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 121, 2016, pp. 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.162.

15.

Jallu

Saride

Arulrajah

Challapalli

Evans

Effect of Curing Time on the Performance of Fly Ash Geopolymer-Stabilized RAP Bases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2021, p. 04021001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003581.

16.

Hoy

Horpibulsuk

Arulrajah

Strength Development of Recycled Asphalt Pavement - Fly Ash Geopolymer as a Road Construction Material. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 117, 2016, pp. 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.136.

17.

Hoy

Rachan

Horpibulsuk

Arulrajah

Mirzababaei

Effect of Wetting–Drying Cycles on Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Recycled Asphalt Pavement – Fly Ash Geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 144, 2017, pp. 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.243.

18.

Amer

O. A.

Rangaraju

Konduru

Hussein

H. Z.

Sustainable Cement Alternatives Utilizing Geopolymer for Use in Full Depth Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2022, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2022.2103132.

19.

Adhikari

Khattak

M. J.

Adhikari

Mechanical Characteristics of Soil-RAP-Geopolymer Mixtures for Road Base and Subbase Layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2020, pp. 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1492131.

20.

Nie

Huang

Shu

Mechanical Property and Microstructure Characteristics of Geopolymer Stabilized Aggregate Base. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 191, 2018, pp. 1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.081.

21.

Poltue

Suddeepong

Horpibulsuk

Samingthong

Arulrajah

Rashid

A. S. A.

Strength Development of Recycled Concrete Aggregate Stabilized with Fly Ash-Rice Husk Ash Based Geopolymer as Pavement Base Material. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 21, No. 8, 2020, pp. 2344–2355. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1593884.

22.

Xiao

Polaczyk

Zhang

Jiang

Zhang

Huang

Evaluation of Glass Powder-Based Geopolymer Stabilized Road Bases Containing Recycled Waste Glass Aggregate. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119898695.

23.

Hassan

H. S.

Abdel-Gawwad

H. A.

Vásquez-García

S. R.

Israde-Alcántara

Flores-Ramirez

Rico

J. L.

Mohammed

M. S.

Cleaner Production of One-Part White Geopolymer Cement Using Pre-Treated Wood Biomass Ash and Diatomite. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 209, 2019, pp. 1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.137.

24.

Bureau of Indian Standard(BIS). IS: 8112 – 1989, Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2013, p. 17.

25.

IS: 2720 part V. Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of Soil. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 1985. pp 1–16.

26.

PCA. Soil Cement Laboratory Handbook. Portland Cement Association, 1992. pp. 1–59.

27.

IRC: SP:89. Guidelines for the Design of Stabilized Pavements Part II. Indian Roads Congress, 2018. pp. 1–31.

28.

IRC:37. Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements. Indian Roads Congress, 2018, pp. 1–80.

29.

IS 4332 Part IV. Methods of Test for Stabilized Soils: Wetting and Drying, and Freezing and Thawing Tests for Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures. Indian Roads Congress, 1968.

30.

IS 4332 Part III. Methods of Test for Stabilized Soils: Determination of Optimum Moisture Content and Maximum Dry Density for Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures. Indian Roads Congress, 1967.

31.

IS 4332 Part V. Methods of Test for Stabilized Soils: Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Stabilized Soils. Indian Roads Congress, 1974.

32.

IS 516. Method of Tests for Strength of Concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, 1959, pp. 1–30.

33.

IS 4332 Part VI. Methods Of Test For Stabilized Soils: Flexural Strength of Soil-Cement Mixtures using Simple Beam with Third Point Loading. Indian Roads Congress, 1972.

34.

Jallu

Asce

S. M.

Saride

Asce

Arulrajah

Challapalli

Evans

Effect of Curing Time on the Performance of Fly Ash Geopolymer-Stabilized RAP Bases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 2017, 2021, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003581.

35.

Moghal

A. A. B.

Kareem Obaid

A. A.

Al-Refeai

T. O.

Al-Shamrani

M. A.

Compressibility and Durability Characteristics of Lime Treated Expansive Semiarid Soils. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2015, pp. 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140060.

36.

Chittoori

B. C. S.

Puppala

A. J.

Pedarla

Addressing Clay Mineralogy Effects on Performance of Chemically Stabilized Expansive Soils Subjected to Seasonal Wetting and Drying. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 144, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001796.

37.

Gonzalo-Orden

Linares-Unamunzaga

Pérez-Acebo

Díaz-Minguela

Advances in the Study of the Behavior of Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) with Cement. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), Vol. 9, No. 15, 2019, p. 3055. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153055.

38.

Taha

Al-Harthy

Al-Shamsi

Al-Zubeidi

Cement Stabilization of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Aggregate for Road Bases and Subbases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2002, pp. 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239).

39.

Adresi

khishdari

Ahmadi

Rooholamini

Influence of High Content of Reclaimed Asphalt on the Mechanical Properties of Cement-Treated Base under Critical Environmental Conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2017.1388508.

40.

Yue

Nie

Wang

Liu

Huang

Research on the Pavement Performance of Slag/Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Macadam. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 19, 2022, 10000. https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910000.

41.

Mir

S. A.

Prasad

S. R. C. N.

Ramteke &

Balwant

Saxsena

A. K.

Indian

T. H. E.

For

Barik

Use of Locally Available Materials in Pavement Sub-Base Use of Locally Available Materials in Pavement Sub-Base. 50Th Indian Geotechnical Conference, Vol. IX, No. Vi, 2015, pp. 99–103.

42.

Lekshmi

Sudhakumar

An Assessment on the Durability Performance of Fly Ash-Clay Based Geopolymer Mortar Containing Clay Enhanced with Lime and GGBS. Cleaner Materials, Vol. 5, 2022, p. 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100129.

43.

Hoy

Horpibulsuk

Arulrajah

Mohajerani

Strength and Microstructural Study of Recycled Asphalt Pavement: Slag Geopolymer as a Pavement Base Material. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2018, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002393.

44.

Singh

Ransinchung

G. D. R. N.

Monu

Kumar

Laboratory Investigation of RAP Aggregates for Dry Lean Concrete Mixes. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 166, 2018, pp. 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.131.

45.

Abraham

S. M.

Ransinchung

G. D. R. N.

Strength and Permeation Characteristics of Cement Mortar with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 167, 2018, pp. 700–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.075.

46.

Nandi

Ransinchung

G. D. R. N.

Performance Evaluation and Sustainability Assessment of Precast Concrete Paver Blocks Containing Coarse and Fine RAP Fractions: A Comprehensive Comparative Study. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 300, 2021, p. 124042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124042.

47.

Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD). Specifications for Rural Roads. Indian Roads Congress, 2004. pp. 1–501.

48.

Debbarma

Selvam

Singh

Can Flexible Pavements’ Waste (RAP) Be Utilized in Cement Concrete Pavements? – A Critical Review. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 259, 2020, p. 120417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120417.

49.

Linares-Unamunzaga

Pérez-Acebo

Rojo

Gonzalo-Orden

Flexural Strength Prediction Models for Soil-Cement from Unconfined Compressive Strength at Seven Days. Materials, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030387.

50.

Phoo-ngernkham

Chindaprasirt

Sata

Hanjitsuwan

Hatanaka

The Effect of Adding Nano-SiO2 and Nano-Al2O3 on Properties of High Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Cured at Ambient Temperature. Materials and Design, Vol. 55, 2014, pp. 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.049.

51.

Barger

G. S.

Bayles

Blair

Brown

Chen

Conway

Hawkins

Ettringite Formation and the Performance of Concrete. Portland Cement Association, Vol. 2166, 2001, pp. 1–16.

52.

Suddeepong

Intra

Horpibulsuk

Suksiripattanapong

Arulrajah

Shen

J. S.

Durability against Wetting-Drying Cycles for Cement-Stabilized Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Blended with Crushed Rock. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2018, pp. 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.02.017.

53.

Puppala

A. J.

Pedarla

Chittoori

Ganne

V. K.

Nazarian

Long-Term Durability Studies on Chemically Treated Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Material as a Base Layer for Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2657: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2657-01.

54.

Marik

Ransinchung

G. D.

Singh

Khot

L. P.

Laboratory Study and Performance Evaluation of Cement Treated Base Using Chemical Stabiliser. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2023, pp. 1522–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2022.2083660.

55.

Aldaood

Bouasker

Al-Mukhtar

Impact of Wetting-Drying Cycles on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Lime-Stabilized Gypseous Soils. Engineering Geology, Vol. 174, 2014, pp. 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.002.

56.

Tabyang

Suksiripattanapong

Phetchuay

Laksanakit

Chusilp

Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash Based Geopolymer for Stabilised Recycled Concrete Aggregate as Road Material. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2022, pp. 2178–2189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2021.1959385.

57.

Zhang

Chen

Xia

Experimental Investigation and Mechanism of Fly Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Soft Soil. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 15, 2022, 7438. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157438.

58.

Ghosh

Ransinchung

G. D.

Application of Machine Learning Algorithm to Assess the Efficacy of Varying Industrial Wastes and Curing Methods on Strength Development of Geopolymer Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 341, 2022, p. 127828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127828.

59.

Mohammadinia

Arulrajah

Phummiphan

Horpibulsuk

Mirzababaei

Flexural Fatigue Strength of Demolition Aggregates Stabilized with Alkali-Activated Calcium Carbide Residue. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 199, 2019, pp. 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.031.