This paper investigates pavement distresses to determine which has the most influence on pavement roughness. For this purpose, the stepwise regression method is used. In addition, the spatial autocorrelation of the data on pavement roughness as a new weight vector parameter considering the geographical location is evaluated and introduced into the regression method. The pavement distress and International Roughness Index (IRI) dataset of the road network managed by Iran’s Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization, collected from 2020 to 2022, is used to select the best predictor variables for each road type in the regression. The results show that using spatial autocorrelation in the method reduces the residual standard errors and increases reliability because of improved residuals’ normality in comparison with the method without considering the spatial autocorrelation. The residuals’ standard errors of the regression considering the spatial autocorrelation are decreased by about 30%, 27%, 25%, and 20% for main roads, secondary roads, freeways, and highways, respectively. Also, the sensitivity analysis reveals that IRI is more affected by increasing the patching area and rutting value for secondary roads, while growing alligator cracks have the most influence on IRI reduction for main roads.
MúčkaP.International Roughness Index Specifications Around the World. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2017, pp. 929–965.
2.
XinJ.AkiyamaM.FrangopolD. M.ZhangM.Multi-Objective Optimisation of In-Service Asphalt Pavement Maintenance Schedule Considering System Reliability Estimated via LSTM Neural Networks. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2022, pp. 1002–1019.
3.
IslamS.ButtlarW. G.Effect of Pavement Roughness on User Costs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2285: 47–55.
4.
MamloukM.VinayakamurthyM.UnderwoodB. S.KaloushK. E.Effects of the International Roughness Index and Rut Depth on Crash Rates. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 418–429.
5.
LouhghalamA.AkbarianM.UlmF. J.Roughness-Induced Pavement–Vehicle Interactions: Key Parameters and Impact on Vehicle Fuel Consumption. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2525: 62–70.
6.
QiaoF.NabiM.LiQ.YuL.Estimating Light-Duty Vehicle Emission Factors Using Random Forest Regression Model with Pavement Roughness. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 37–52.
7.
BilodeauJ. P.GagnonL.DoréG.Assessment of the Relationship Between the International Roughness Index and Dynamic Loading of Heavy Vehicles. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 8, 2017, pp. 693–701.
8.
SmithK. D.RamP.Measuring and Specifying Pavement Smoothness: [techbrief]. FHWA-HIF-16-032. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016.
9.
ASTM E1926–08. Standard Practice for Computing International Roughness Index of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
10.
HossainM. I.GopisettiL. S. P.MiahM. S.International Roughness Index Prediction of Flexible Pavements Using Neural Networks. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, Vol. 145, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018058.
11.
MandiarthaP.DuffieldC. F.ThompsonR. G.WiganM. R.Measuring Pavement Maintenance Effectiveness Using Markov Chains Analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2017, pp. 844–854.
12.
Al-SuleimanT. I.ShiyabA. M.Prediction of Pavement Remaining Service Life Using Roughness Data—Case Study in Dubai. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2003, pp. 121–129.
13.
SollazzoG.FwaT. F.BosurgiG.An ANN Model to Correlate Roughness and Structural Performance in Asphalt Pavements. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 134, 2017, pp. 684–693.
14.
AbdelazizN.Abd El-HakimR. T.El-BadawyS. M.AfifyH. A.International Roughness Index Prediction Model for Flexible Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2020, pp. 88–99.
15.
FHWA. National Performance Management Measures; Assessing Pavement Condition for the National Highway Performance Program and Bridge Condition for the National Highway Performance Program. United States: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, D.C., 2017.
16.
MRUD. Statistical and Data Center of Ministry of Roads and Urban Development of Iran, no 27245/100/02. https://mrud.ir/en/. 2016.
17.
KhattakM. J.NurM. A.BhuyanM. R. U. K.GaspardK.International Roughness Index Models for HMA Overlay Treatment of Flexible and Composite Pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2014, pp. 334–344.
18.
Pérez-AceboH.Linares-UnamunzagaA.RojíE.Gonzalo-OrdenH.IRI Performance Models for Flexible Pavements in Two-Lane Roads Until First Maintenance and/or Rehabilitation Work. Coatings, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, p. 97.
19.
Dalla RosaF.LiuL.GharaibehN. G.IRI Prediction Model for Use in Network-Level Pavement Management Systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, Vol. 143, No. 1, 2017, p. 04017001.
20.
WangC.XuS.YangJ.Adaboost Algorithm in Artificial Intelligence for Optimizing the IRI Prediction Accuracy of Asphalt Concrete Pavement. Sensors, Vol. 21, No. 17, 2021, p. 5682.
21.
MazariM.RodriguezD. D.Prediction of Pavement Roughness Using a Hybrid Gene Expression Programming-Neural Network Technique. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 3, No. 5, 2016, pp. 448–455.
22.
Al-SuleimanT. I.AlatoomY. I.Development of Pavement Roughness Regression Models Based on Smartphone Measurements. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2024, pp. 1136–1157.
23.
SandraA. K.SarkarA. K.Development of a Model for Estimating International Roughness Index from Pavement Distresses. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2013, pp. 715–724.
24.
ElhadidyA. A.El-BadawyS. M.ElbeltagiE. E.A Simplified Pavement Condition Index Regression Model for Pavement Evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2021, pp. 643–652.
25.
MubarakiM.Highway Subsurface Assessment Using Pavement Surface Distress and Roughness Data. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2016, pp. 393–402.
26.
SharmaA.SachdevaS. N.AggarwalP.Predicting IRI Using Machine Learning Techniques. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2023, pp. 128–137.
27.
LuoZ.WangH.LiS.Prediction of International Roughness Index Based on Stacking Fusion Model. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 12, 2022, p. 6949.
28.
PhilipB.JassmiH. A.A Bayesian Approach towards Modelling the Interrelationships of Pavement Deterioration Factors. Buildings, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2022, p. 1039.
29.
Al-MansourA. I.ShokriA. A.Correlation of Pavement Distress and Roughness Measurement. Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2022, p. 3748.
30.
MactutisJ. A.AlaviS. H.OttW. C.Investigation of Relationship Between Roughness and Pavement Surface Distress Based on WesTrack Project. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000. 1699: 107–113.
31.
LinJ. D.YauJ. T.HsiaoL. H.Correlation Analysis between International Roughness Index (IRI) and Pavement. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
32.
ChandraS.SekharC. R.BhartiA. K.KangaduraiB.Relationship Between Pavement Roughness and Distress Parameters for Indian Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 5, 2013, pp. 467–475.
33.
GongH.SunY.ShuX.HuangB.Use of Random Forests Regression for Predicting IRI of Asphalt Pavements. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 189, 2018, pp. 890–897.
34.
LongleyP. A.GoodchildM. F.MaguireD. J.RhindD. W.Geographic Information Science and Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2015.
35.
RogersonP. A.Statistical Methods for Geography. SAGE Publication Ltd, London, 2001.
36.
BoukercheA.ZhengL.AlfandiO.Outlier Detection: Methods, Models, and Classification. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol. 53, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1–37.
37.
GrubbsF. E.Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples. Technometrics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1969, pp. 1–21.
38.
AgrestiA.Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, 2nd ed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2010.
39.
SiasJ. E.DaveE. V.ZhangR.Rahbar-RastegarR.Incorporating Impact of Aging on Cracking Performance of Mixtures during Design. Technical Report, NHDOT 26962O. New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Concord, 2019.
40.
ToblerW. R.A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, Vol. 46, 1970, pp. 234–240.
41.
AnselinL.Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1995, pp. 93–115.
42.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. 2013.
43.
ShapiroS. S.WilkM. B.An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, Vol. 52, No. 3–4, 1965, pp. 591–611.
44.
KırbaşU.IRI Sensitivity to the Influence of Surface Distress on Flexible Pavements. Coatings, Vol. 8, No. 8, 2018, p. 271.
