Women and sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) have unique transportation experiences and needs, including public transit services. However, there is a gap in the data that documents their experiences and needs. This paper aims to add to existing research by examining the transit needs and experiences of women and SGMs, which include, but are not limited to, individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, asexual, transgender, Two-Spirit, queer, intersex, or gender nonconforming. Employing a qualitative research approach, we conducted focus groups with individuals who use NJ TRANSIT services in New Jersey. Through an examination of topics related to accessibility, comfort, transit reliability, agency communications, personal safety, security, harassment, and discrimination, we aim to better understand the mobility needs, barriers, challenges, and concerns of women and SGMs when using transit. We compare the needs across the three groups (cisgender women, lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals, and transgender/gender nonconforming individuals) to identify differences and similarities in experiences. Ultimately, this research aims to provide transit agency decision-makers with the information needed to implement service, operational, and staffing changes that improve travel experiences for this population of riders.
AkyelkenN.Transport for Women: Who Decides What Women Need?Transport Reviews, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2020, pp. 687–688.
2.
National Institutes of Health. Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, s.l., n.d.
3.
StarkJ.MeschikM.Women’s Everyday Mobility: Frightenig Situations and Their Impacts on Travel Behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 54, 2018, pp. 311–323.
JamesS. E.HermanJ.RankinS.KeislingM.MottetL.AnafiM.The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality, Washington, D.C., 2016.
6.
GalaciaC.HiguerosE.KhannaM.Understanding How Women Travel. LA Metro, Los Angeles, CA, 2019.
LA Metro. Gender Action Plan. LA Metro, Los Angeles, CA, 2022.
11.
LawR.Beyond ‘Women and Transport’: Towards New Geographies of Gender and Daily Mobility. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1999, pp. 567–588.
12.
HansonS.Gender and Mobility: New Approaches for Informing Sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 17, No. 1. 2010, pp. 5–23.
13.
UtengT. P.Smart Mobilities: A Gendered Perspective. Kart Og Plan, Vol. 112, No. 4, 2019, pp. 258–281.
14.
WaygoodE. O. D.What Is the Role of Mothers in Transit-Oriented Development? The Case of Osaka-Kyoto-Kobe, Japan. Proc., Women’s Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference, Irvine, CA, Vol. 2, 2011.
15.
CahillR.CuffeS.ChauR.DoodyL.McCartneyA.O’HalloranO.SaundersK.Nguyen VuZ.UmavasseeY.Travelling in a Woman’s Shoes. Transport Infrastructure Ireland, s.l., 2020.
16.
GouldJ.ZhouJ.A Commitment to Continue? Comparing Women and Men Commuters Who Choose Transit over Driving Alone. Proc., Women’s Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference, Irvine, CA, Vol. 2, 2011.
17.
McGuckinN.MurakamiE.Examining Trip-Chaining Behavior: Comparison of Travel by Men and Women. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1693: 79–85.
18.
TaylorB. D.RalphK.SmartM.What Explains the Gender Gap in Schlepping? Testing Various Explanations for Gender Differences in Household-Serving Travel. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 96, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1493–1510.
19.
Loukaitou-SiderisA.What Is Blocking Her Path? Women, Mobility, and Security. Proc., Women’s Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference, Irvine, CA, Vol. 1, 2011.
20.
HsuH.-P.BoarnetM. G.HoustonD.Gender and Rail Transit Use: Influence of Environmental Beliefs and Safety Concerns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 327–338.
21.
CoppolaP.SilvestriF., Gender Inequality in Safety and Security Perceptions in Railway Stations. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2021, p. 4007.
22.
IvanovaO.O’HernS.Mobility of Non-Binary and Gender Nonconforming Individuals: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 121, 2024, p. 104008.
23.
BadgettM. V. L.ChoiS. K.WilsonB. D. M.LGBT Poverty in the United States: A Study of Differences Between Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Groups. UCLA School of Law Williams Institute, Los Angeles, CA, 2019.
24.
WilsonB. D. M.BoutonL. J. A.BadgetM. V. L.MacklinM. L.LGBT Poverty in the United States: Trends at the Onset of COVID-19. The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, Los Angeles, CA, 2023.
25.
WeintrobA.HansellL.ZebrackiM.BarnardY.LucasK.Queer Mobilities: Critical LGBTQ Perspectives of Public Transport Spaces. Mobilities, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2021, pp. 775–791.
26.
LubitowA.CarathersJ.KellyM.AbelsonM.Transmobilities: Mobility, Harassment, and Violence Experienced by Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Public Transit Riders in Portland, Oregon. Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2017, pp. 1398–1418.
Skellington OrrK.SmithW.BarryM.SharpL.Women’s and Girls’ Views and Experiences of Personal Safety When Using Public Transport: Summary Report. Transport Scotland, s.l., 2023.
30.
PrestonV.McLaffertyS.Revisiting Gender, Race, and Commuting in New York. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 106, No. 2, 2016, pp. 300–310.
31.
Horizons Foundation. San Francisco Bay Area LGBTQ Community Needs Assessment. Horizons Foundation, San Francisco, CA, 2018.
32.
BabbarP.PeaceJ.CooperD.BoisjolyG.GriséE.Understanding and Responding to the Transit Needs of Women in Canada. Polytechnique Montreal, s.l., 2022.
33.
LubitowA.RainerJ.BassettS.Exclusion and Vulnerability on Public Transit: Experiences of Transit Dependent Riders in Portland, Oregon. Mobilities, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2017, pp. 924–937.
34.
BedfordT.BurgessJ.The Focus-Group Experience. In Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers (LimbM.DwyerC., eds.), Arnold, London, 2001, pp. 121–135.
