The definition of symbiosis is reconsidered, and the implications of this reassessment for the phenomenon of transference are examined. Four relationship types are also described in terms of this redefinition of symbiosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FriedlanderM. G. (Ed.). (1991a). Transactional Analysis Journal, 21(2).
2.
FriedlanderM. G. (Ed.). (1991b). Transactional Analysis Journal, 21(3).
3.
GouldingM. M., & GouldingR. L. (1979). Changing lives through redecision therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
4.
MasseyR. F. (1991). The evolution of perspectives on transference in relation to transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 155–169.
5.
MoisoC. (1985). Ego states and transference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 194–201.
6.
NovellinoM. (1984). Self-analysis of countertransference in integrative transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14, 63–67.
7.
NovellinoM. (1985). Redecision analysis of transference: A TA approach to transference neurosis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 202–206.
8.
SchiffJ. L.SchiffA. W., MellorK., SchiffE., SchiffS., RichmanD., FishmanJ., WolzL., FishmanC., & MombD. (1975). Cathexis reader: Transactional analysis treatment of psychosis. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
WhiteT. (1995, November). Combining training and treatment. TA Times, 15–17.
