Background:Preconditioning of tendon grafts is believed to eliminate natural viscoelasticity of the tendons and prevent knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Hypothesis:Preconditioned ACL grafts maintain their initially set tension.
Study Design:Randomized experimental study.
Methods:Forty-two human anterior tibialis (AT) tendon grafts were subjected to either no preconditioning (group 1), cyclic preconditioning (group 2), or isometric preconditioning (group 3). The residual graft tension was then recorded immediately after the application of an initial graft tension of 80 N and fixation into tibia with an interference screw, as well as 10 minutes later. In another experiment, the residual graft tension was recorded 1, 10, and 60 minutes after 10 AT nd quadrupled hamstring tendon (HT) grafts alone (no fixation) had been subjected to isometric preconditioning (80 N).
Results:Immediately after screw insertion, the residual (AT) graft tensions were 79 ± 19 N, 100 ± 17 N, and 102 ± 15 N in groups 1 through 3, respectively. Ten minutes later, the corresponding values were 49 ± 16 N, 60 ± 11 N, and 64 ± 12 N. For the AT and HT grafts alone, the residual graft tensions were 67 ± 2 N and 67 ± 2 N, 45 ± 2 N and 46 ± 4 N, and 29 ± 3 N and 34 ± 5 N at 1, 10, and 60 minutes, respectively.
Conclusions:A steady decrease (–60% within 60 minutes after initial tensioning) occurs in the initially set tension of the soft tissue ACL grafts.
Clinical Relevance:Clinically applicable preconditioning protocols cannot eliminate the intrinsic viscoelasticity from ACL soft tissue grafts, and thus, the reasonableness of preconditioning per se is questioned in ACL reconstruction.
1. Amis AA, Jakob RP. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(suppl 1):S2-S12.
2.
2. Arms SW, Pope MH, Johnson RJ, et al. Analysis of ACL failure strength and initial strains in the canine model. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1990;15:524-524.
3.
3. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, et al. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:722-728.
4.
4. Barrett GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: a comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:46-54.
5.
5. Beynnon BD, Amis AA. In vitro testing protocols for the cruciate ligaments and ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(suppl 1):S70-S76.
6.
6. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, et al. The measurement of elongation of anterior cruciate-ligament grafts in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76A:520-531.
7.
7. Brand J, Weiler A, Caborn DNM, et al. Graft fixation issues in knee ligament surgery. Oper Tech Orthop. 1999;9:256-263.
8.
8. Burks RT, Leland R. Determination of graft tension before fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1988;4:260-266.
10. Charlick DA, Caborn DNM. Alternative soft-tissue graft preparation technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:3-5.
11.
11. Cunningham R, West JR, Greis PE, et al. A survey of the tension applied to a doubled hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:983-988.
12.
12. DeLay BS, Smolinski RJ, Wind WM, et al. Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14:85-91.
13.
13. Donahue TLH, Howell SM, Hull ML, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior tibialis tendons as suitable single-loop anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:589-597.
14.
14. Frank C, Amiel D, Akeson WH. Healing of the medial collateral ligament of the knee: a morphological and biomechanical assessment in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:917-923.
15.
15. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, et al. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:821-830.
16.
16. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, et al. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: operative procedures and clinical correlations. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:124-130.
17.
17. Fu FH, Ma CB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadruple hamstring. Oper Tech Orthop. 1999;9:264-272.
18.
18. Graf BK, Vanderby R Jr, Ulm MJ, et al. Effect of preconditioning on the viscoelastic response of primate patellar tendon. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:90-96.
19.
19. Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ, et al. Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:330-336.
20.
20. Howell SM, Gittins ME, Gottlieb JE, et al. The relationship between the angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane and loss of flexion and anterior laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:567-574.
21.
21. Katsuragi R, Yasuda K, Tsujino J, et al. The effect of nonphysiologically high initial tension on the mechanical properties of in situ frozen anterior cruciate ligament in a canine model. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:47-56.
22.
22. Kousa P, Järvinen TLN, Vihavainen M, et al. The fixation strength of six different hamstring graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:174-181.
23.
23. Kousa P, Järvinen TLN, Vihavainen M, et al. The fixation strength of six different hamstring graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: tibial site. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:182-188.
24.
24. Nabors ED, Richmond JC, Vannah WM, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament graft tensioning in full extension. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:488-492.
25.
25. Noojin FK, Barrett GR, Hartzog CW, et al. Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:783-789.
26.
26. Numazaki H, Tohyama H, Nakano H, et al. The effect of initial graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the mechanical behaviors of the femur-graft-tibia complex during cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:800-805.
27.
27. Nurmi JT, Kannus P, Sievänen H, et al. Compaction drilling does not increase the initial fixation strength of the hamstring graft in ACL reconstruction in a cadaver model. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:353-358.
28.
28. Pelker RR, Friedlaender G, Markham TC, et al. Effects of freezing and freeze-drying on the biomechanical properties of rat bone. J Orthop Res. 1984;1:405-411.
29.
29. Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Stäubli HU. Effect of cyclic preconditioning on the tensile properties of human quadriceps tendons and patellar ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arhrosc. 1998;6(suppl 1):S56-S61.
30.
30. Shino K, Mae T, Maeda A, et al. Graft fixation with predetermined tension using a new device, the Double Spike Plate. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:908-911.
31.
31. Sievänen H, Koskue V, Rauhio A, et al. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:871-882.
32.
32. Simonian PT, Sussmann PS, Baldini TH, et al. Interference screw position and hamstring graft location for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:459-464.
33.
33. Steenlage E, Brand JC Jr, Johnson DL, et al. Correlation of bone tunnel diameter with quadrupled hamstring graft fixation strength using a biodegradable interference screw. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:901-907.
34.
34. Tohyama H, Yasuda K. Significance of graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: basic background and clinical outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(suppl 1):S30-S37.
35.
35. van Kampen A, Wymenga AB, van der Heide HJL, et al. The effect of different graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:845-850.
36.
36. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Tanabe Y, et al. Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: autogenous doubled hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:99-106.
37.
37. Weiler A, Hoffmann RFG, Stähelin AC, et al. Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:29-37.
38.
38. Yoshiya S, Andrish JT, Manley MT, et al. Graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo study in dogs. Am J Sports Med. 1987;15:464-470.
39.
39. Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Ouchi K, et al. Graft tension and knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop. 2002;394:154-160.
