Anchor Design and Bone Mineral Density Affect the Pull-Out Strength of Suture Anchors in Rotator Cuff Repair

Abstract

Background: Different metal and biodegradable suture anchors are available for rotator cuff repair. Poor bone quality may result in anchor loosening and tendon rerupture.

Hypotheses: Higher bone mineral density is associated with higher pull-out strength of suture anchors. Depending on anchor placement, pull-out strengths of anchors are different within the greater tuberosity.

Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study.

Methods: Trabecular and cortical bone mineral densities were determined for different regions within the greater tuberosity. Metal screw-type and biodegradable hook-type anchors were cyclically loaded.

Results: Mean failure load of metal and biodegradable anchors was 273 N and 162 N, respectively, for the proximal part (P < .01) and 184 N and 112 N, respectively, for the distal part (P < .01). Both types of anchors showed higher failure loads in the proximal-anterior and -middle parts of the greater tuberosity than in the distal part (P < .01). A significant positive correlation was found between cortical bone mineral density and failure load of metal anchors (P < .01).

Conclusion: Bone quality, anchor type, and anchor placement have a significant impact on anchor failure loads.

Clinical Relevance: Suture anchors should be placed in the proximal-anterior and -middle parts of the greater tuberosity. In the distal parts, biodegradable hook-like anchors should be used with caution.

Keywords

rotator cuff repair bone mineral density suture anchor anchor design pull-out strength

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman DG

Gore SM

Gardner MJ

, et al. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. Br Med J. 1983; 286: 1489-1493.

Barber FA

Feder SM

Burkhart SS

, et al. The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 340-345.

Barber FA

Herbert MA

. Suture anchors: update 1999. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 719-725.

Barber FA

Herbert MA

Click JN

. Internal fixation strength of suture anchors: update 1997. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 355-362.

Barber FA

Herbert MA

Click JN

. Suture anchor strength revisited. Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 32-38.

Berg EE

Oglesby JW

. Loosening of a biodegradable shoulder staple. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5: 76-78.

Burkhart SS

. The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 119-123.

Burkhart SS

Fischer SP

Nottage WM

, et al. Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: a mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures. Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 704-708.

Craft DV

Moseley JB

Cawley PW

, et al. Fixation strength of rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and the transosseous suture technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5: 32-40.

10.

Djurasovic M

Marra G

Arroyo JS

, et al. Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 1849-1855.

11.

Gartsman GM

. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop. 2001; 390: 95-106.

12.

Gerber C

Schneeberger AG

Beck M

, et al. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76: 371-380.

13.

Goradia VK

Mullen DJ

Boucher HR

, et al. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 360-364.

14.

Harryman DT

Mack LA

Wang KY

, et al. Repairs of the rotator cuff: correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73: 982-989.

15.

Hecker AT

Shea M

Hayhurst JO

, et al. Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21: 874-879.

16.

Kannus P

Leppala J

Lehto M

, et al. A rotator cuff rupture produces permanent osteoporosis in the affected extremity, but not in those with whom shoulder function has returned to normal. J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10: 1263-1271.

17.

Lang TA

Secic M.

How to Report Statistics in Medicine. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1997: 81-92.

18.

Montgomery D.

Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2001: 47-53.

19.

Schneeberger AG

von Roll A

Kalberer F

, et al. Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 2152-2160.

20.

Sher JS

Uribe JW

Posada A

, et al. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77: 10-15.

21.

Sokal RR

Rohlf FJ

. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York, NY: Freeman; 1995.

22.

Ticker JB

Warner JJ

. Single-tendon tears of the rotator cuff: evaluation and treatment of subscapularis tears and principles of treatment for supraspinatus tears. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997; 28: 99-116.