Time-Dependent Changes in Failure Loads of 3 Biceps Tenodesis Techniques

Abstract

Background:Failure load of the tendon–fixation material–bone unit has a crucial importance for the rehabilitation protocol after tenodesis procedures.

Purpose:To investigate and compare the time-dependent changes in fixation strengths of 3 proximal biceps tenodesis techniques.

Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:Two intraosseous techniques (suture sling and tenodesis screw) and 1 extraosseous technique (2 suture anchors) were investigated. Biceps tenodesis was performed on 45 shoulders of 26 sheep, 15 shoulders for each technique. Twelve similar cadaveric sheep shoulders (4 for each technique) provided the day 0 results. Sheep were sacrificed at 3, 6, and 9 weeks, and specimens were tested for the failure load of the tenodeses.

Results:All 3 tenodesis techniques were found to have similar failure loads at all time intervals tested. All 3 curves remained below the failure load of the intact tendon (862 ± 96 N) and above their day 0 results for the study period; similarly, at each time interval, results tended to be better compared to the previous test. The tenodesis screw group exhibited significantly higher failure loads at week 3 (419 ± 53 N) compared to day 0 values (164 ± 45 N) (P= .009). The same level of significance was observed at week 6 in the remaining 2 groups.

Conclusion:Tenodesis of the biceps tendon on the proximal humerus at an extra-articular site does not weaken after surgery. The tenodesis screw group had a significantly higher increase in the fixation strength within the first 3 weeks.

Clinical Relevance:No significant differences could be found between the failure loads of all 3 investigated tenodeses for the first 9 weeks.

Keywords

biceps tendon bone bioabsorbable interference screw (BIS)anchor tenodesis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker DA

Cofield RH

. Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii for chronic bicipital tendinitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:376-380.

Berlemann U

Bayley I

. Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii in the painful shoulder: improving results in the long term. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.1995;4:429-435.

Blickenstaff KR

Grana WA

Egle D

. Analysis of a semitendinosus autograft in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med.1997;25:554-559.

Brand JC

Pienkowski D

Steenlage E

Hamilton D

Johnson DL

Caborn DN

. Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque. Am J Sports Med.2000;28:705-710.

Burkhart SS

. Biomechanics of rotator cuff repair: converting the ritual to a science. Instr Course Lect.1998;47:43-50.

Curtis AS

Snyder SJ

. Evaluation and treatment of biceps tendon pathology. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:33-43.

Froimson AL

Oh L

. Keyhole tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1975;112:245-249.

Greis PE

Burks RT

Bachus K

Luker MG

. The influence of tendon length and fit on the strength of a tendon–bone tunnel complex: a biomechanical and histologic study in the dog. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:493-497.

Harrison JA

Wallace D

Van Sickle D

Martin T

Sonnabend DH

Walsh WR

. A novel suture anchor of high-density collagen compared with a metallic anchor. Am J Sports Med.2000;28:883-887.

10.

Jayamoorthy T

Field JR

Costi JJ

Martin DK

Stanley RM

Hearn TC

. Biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical study of fixation methods. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.2004;13:160-164.

11.

Kilicoglu O

Demirhan M

Akman S

Atalar AC

Ozsoy S

Ince Y

. Failure strength of bioabsorbable interference screws: effect of in vivo degradation for 12 weeks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:228-234.

12.

Liu SH

Panossian V

Al-Shaikh R

, et al. Morphology and matrix composition during early tendon to bone healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;339:253-260.

13.

Lo IKY

Burkhart SS

. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:85-95.

14.

Magen HE

Howel SM

Hull ML

. Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med.1999;27:35-43.

15.

Mainil-Varlet P

Cordey J

Gogolewski S

. Positional stability of polylactide pins with various surface texture in the sheep tibia. J Biomed Mater Res.1997;34:351-359.

16.

Paulson MM

Watnik NF

Dines DM

. Coracoid impingement syndrome, rotator interval reconstruction, and biceps tenodesis in the overhead athlete. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:485-493.

17.

Robert H

Es-Sayeh J

Heymann D

Passuti N

Eloit S

Vaneenoge E

. Hamstring insertion site healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with symptomatic hardware or repeat rupture: a histologic study in 12 patients. Arthroscopy.2003;19:948-954.

18.

Rodeo SA

Arnoczky SP

Torzilli PA

Hidaka C

Warren RF

. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel: a biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1993;75:1795-1803.

19.

Selby JB

Johnson DL

Hester P

Caborn DN

. Effect of screw length on bioabsorbable interference screw fixation in a tibial bone tunnel. Am J Sports Med.2001;29:614-619.

20.

Singhatat W

Lawhorn KW

Howell SM

Hull ML

. How four weeks of implantation affect the strength and stiffness of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel: a study of two fixation devices in an extraarticular model in ovine. Am J Sports Med.2002;30:506-513.

21.

Soda Y

Sumen Y

Murakami Y

Ikuta Y

Ochi M

. Attachment of autogenous graft to cortical bone is better than to cancellous bone: a mechanical and histological study of MCL reconstruction in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand.2003;74:322-326.

22.

St Pierre P

Olson EJ

Elliott JJ

O'Hair KC

McKinney LA

Ryan J

. Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1995;77:1858-1866.

23.

Tomita F

Yasuda K

Mikami S

Sakai T

Yamazaki S

Tohyama H

. Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone–patellar tendon–bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy.2001;17:461-476.

24.

Walton M

. Absorbable and metal interference screws: comparison of graft security during healing. Arthroscopy.1999;15:818-826.

25.

Weiler A

Förster C

Hunt P

, et al. The influence of locally applied platelet-derived growth factor–BB on free tendon graft remodeling after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:881-891.

26.

Weiler A

Hoffmann RFG

Bail HJ

Rehm O

Sudkamp NP

. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel, part II: histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy.2002;18:124-135.

27.

Weiler A

Hoffmann RFG

Stahelin AC

Bail HJ

Siepe CJ

Sudkamp NP

. Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone. Arthroscopy.1998;14:29-37.

28.

Weiler A

Peine R

Pashmineh-Azar A

Abel C

Sudkamp NP

Hoffmann RF

. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel, part I: biomechanical results after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:113-123.

29.

Weiler A

Unterhauser FN

Faensen B

, et al. Comparison of tendon-tobone healing using extracortical and anatomic interference fit fixation of soft tissue grafts in a sheep model of ACL reconstruction. Paper presented at: 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; February 10-13, 2002; Dallas, Tex.