Biochemical and Biomechanical Properties of Lesion and Adjacent Articular Cartilage After Chondral Defect Repair in an Equine Model

Abstract

Background: Chondral defects may lead to degradative changes in the surrounding cartilage, predisposing patients to developing osteoarthritis.

Purpose: To quantify changes in the biomechanical and biochemical properties of the articular cartilage adjacent to chondral defects after experimental defect repair.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Specimens were harvested from tissue within (lesion), immediately adjacent to, and at a distance from (remote area) a full-thickness cartilage defect 8 months after cartilage repair with genetically modified chondrocytes expressing insulin-like growth factor-I or unmodified, control chondrocytes. Biomechanical properties, including instantaneous Young’s and equilibrium aggregate moduli, were determined by confined compression testing. Biochemical properties, such as water and proteoglycan content, were also measured.

Results: The instantaneous Young’s modulus, equilibrium modulus, and proteoglycan content increased, whereas water content decreased with increasing distance from the repaired lesion. The instantaneous Young’s and equilibrium moduli of the adjacent articular cartilage were 80% and 50% that of remote area samples, respectively, whereas water content increased 0.9% and proteoglycan content was decreased by 35%. No significant changes in biomechanical and biochemical properties were found either in the lesion tissue or in adjacent cartilage with genetic modification of the chondrocytes.

Conclusion: Articular cartilage adjacent to repaired chondral defects showed significant remodeling 8 months after chondral defect repair, regardless of whether genetically modified or unmodified cells were implanted.

Clinical Relevance: Changes in the biochemical and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage adjacent to repaired chondral defects may represent remodeling as part of an adaptive process or degeneration secondary to an altered distribution of joint forces. Quantification of these changes could provide important parameters for assessing progress after operative chondral defect repair.

Keywords

chondral defect repair biochemical and biomechanical properties articular cartilage confined compression testing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahsan T

Sah R

. Biomechanics of integrative cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7:29-40.

Bonassar LJ

Jeffries KA

Paguio CG

Grodzinsky AJ

. Cartilage degradation and associated changes in biochemical and electromechanical properties. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;266(suppl):38-44.

Breinan HA

Minas T

Hsu HP

Nehrer S

Sledge CB

Spector M

. Effect of cultured autologous chondrocytes on repair of chondral defects in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1439-1451.

Brittberg M

Tallheden T

Sjogren-Jansson B

Lindahl A

Peterson L

. Autologous chondrocytes used for articular cartilage repair: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391(suppl):S337-S348.

Brower-Toland BD

Saxer RA

Goodrich LR

et al.

Direct adenovirus-mediated insulin-like growth factor I gene transfer enhances transplant chondrocyte function. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12:117-129.

Brown TD

Anderson DD

Nepola JV

Singerman RJ

Pedersen DR

Brand RA

. Contact stress aberrations following imprecise reduction of simple tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:851-862.

Buckwalter J

. Articular cartilage injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:21-37.

Buckwalter J

Mankin H

. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration and transplantation. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:487-504.

Chen CT

Burton-Wurster N

Lust G

Bank RA

Tekoppele JM

. Compositional and metabolic changes in damaged cartilage are peak-stress, stress-rate and loading-duration dependent. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:870-879.

10.

Chen F

Frenkel S

Di Cesare P

. Repair of articular cartilage defects, part I: basic science of cartilage healing. Am J Orthop. 1999;28:31-33.

11.

DePalma A

McKeever C

Subin S

. Process of repair of articular cartilage demonstrated by histology and autoradiography with tritiated thymidine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1966;48:229-242.

12.

Farndale R

Buttle D

Barrett A

. Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986;883:173-177.

13.

Fortier LA

Mohammed HO

Lust G

Nixon AJ

. Insulin-like growth factor-I enhances cell-based repair of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:276-288.

14.

Fosang A

Tyler J

Hardingham T

. Effects of interleukin-1 and insulin-like growth factor-1 on the release of proteoglycan components and hyaluronan from pig articular cartilage in explant culture. Matrix. 1991;11:17-24.

15.

Frenkel S

Di Cesare P

. Degradation and repair of articular cartilage. Front Biosci. 1999;4:671-685.

16.

Hale J

Rudert J

Brown T

. Indentation assessment of biphasic mechanical property deficits in size-dependent osteochondral defect repair. J Biomech. 1993;26:1319-1325.

17.

Hembry RM

Dyce J

Driesang I

et al.

Immunolocalization of matrix metalloproteinases in partial-thickness defects in pig articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:826-838.

18.

Hendrickson DA

Nixon AJ

Grande DA

et al.

Chondrocyte-fibrin matrix transplants for resurfacing extensive articular cartilage defects. J Orthop Res. 1994;12:485-497.

19.

Hidaka C

Goodrich LR

Chen CT

Warren RF

Crystal RG

Nixon AJ

. Acceleration of cartilage repair by genetically modified chondrocytes over expressing bone morphogenetic protein-7. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:573-583.

20.

Hunziker E

. Articular cartilage repair: are the intrinsic biological constraints undermining this process insuperable?Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7:15-28.

21.

Hunziker E

. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;10:432-463.

22.

Hunziker E

Rosenberg L

. Repair of partial-thickness defects in articular cartilage: cell recruitment from the synovial membrane. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;76:721-733.

23.

Kurz B

Jin M

Patwari P

Cheng DM

Lark MW

Grodzinsky AJ

. Biosynthetic response and mechanical properties of articular cartilage after injurious compression. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:1140-1146.

24.

Laasanen MS

Toyras J

Korhonen RK

et al.

Biomechanical properties of knee articular cartilage. Biorheology. 2003;40:133-140.

25.

Lee CR

Grodzinsky AJ

Hsu HP

Spector M

. Effects of a cultured autologous chondrocyte-seeded type II collagen scaffold on the healing of a chondral defect in a canine model. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:272-281.

26.

Liu Y

Chen F

Liu W

et al.

Repairing large porcine full-thickness defects of articular cartilage using autologous chondrocyte-engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng. 2002;8:709-721.

27.

Malemud C

. The role of growth factors in cartilage metabolism. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1993;38:569-580.

28.

Mankin HJ

. The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:460-466.

29.

Mankin HJ

Jennings LC

Treadwell BV

Trippel SB

. Growth factors and articular cartilage. J Rheumatol. 1991;27(suppl):66-67.

30.

Mankin HJ

Mow V

Buckwalter J

et al.

Articular cartilage structure, composition and function. In: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Orthopaedic Basic Science. Rosemont, Ill: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2000:443-468.

31.

Minas T

. The role of cartilage repair techniques, including chondrocyte transplantation, in focal chondral knee damage. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:629-643.

32.

O’Driscoll S

. The healing and regeneration of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1795-1812.

33.

Peretti GM

Bonassar LJ

Caruso EM

Randolph MA

Trahan CA

Zaleske DJ

. Biomechanical analysis of a chondrocyte-based repair model of articular cartilage. Tissue Eng. 1999;5:317-326.

34.

Saxer RA

Bent SJ

Brower-Toland BD

et al.

Gene mediated insulin-like growth factor-I delivery to the synovium. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:759-767.

35.

Sellards R

Nho S

Cole B

. Chondral injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:134-141.

36.

Shapiro F

Koide S

Glimcher M

. Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:532-553.

37.

Thompson R Jr

. An experimental study of surface injury to articular cartilage and enzyme responses within the joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;107:239-248.

38.

Torzilli P

. Measurements of the compressive properties of thin cartilage slices: evaluating tissue inhomogeneity. In:

Maroudas A

Kuettner K

, eds. Methods in Cartilage Research. London, England: Academic Press; 1990:304-311.

39.

Trumble T

Allan CH

Miyano J

et al.

A preliminary study of joint surface changes after an intraarticular fracture: a sheep model of a tibia fracture with weight bearing after internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:326-332.